The Contactin-Related Protein FAR-2 Defines Purkinje Cell Clusters and Labels Subpopulations of Climbing Fibers in the Developing Cerebellum

2001 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonius Plagge ◽  
Luzie Sendtner-Voelderndorff ◽  
Pinar Sirim ◽  
Jörg Freigang ◽  
Christoph Rader ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa Michelle Wilson ◽  
Richard Schalek ◽  
Adi Suissa-Peleg ◽  
Thouis Ray Jones ◽  
Seymour Knowles-Barley ◽  
...  

SUMMARYDuring postnatal development, cerebellar climbing fibers strongly innervate a subset of their original Purkinje cell targets and eliminate their connections from the rest. In the adult, each climbing fiber innervates a small number of Purkinje cells and each Purkinje cell is innervated by a single climbing fiber. To get insight about the processes responsible for this remapping, we reconstructed serial electron microscopy datasets from mice during the first postnatal week. In contrast to adult connectivity, individual neonatal climbing fibers innervate many nearby Purkinje cells, and multiple climbing fibers innervate each Purkinje cell. Between postnatal days 3 and 7, Purkinje cells retract long dendrites and grow many proximal dendritic processes. On this changing landscape, individual climbing fibers selectively add many synapses to a subset of Purkinje cell targets in a positive-feedback manner, without pruning synapses from other Purkinje cells. The active zone sizes of synapses associated with powerful versus weak inputs are indistinguishable. These results show that changes in synapse number rather than synapse size are the predominant form of early developmental plasticity. Finally, although multiple climbing fibers innervate each Purkinje cell in early postnatal development, the number of climbing fibers and Purkinje cells in a local cerebellar region nearly match. Thus, initial over-innervation of Purkinje cells by climbing fibers is economical, in that the number of axons entering a region is enough to assure that each axon ends up with a postsynaptic target, and that none branched there in vain.HIGHLIGHTSDeveloping climbing fibers establish synapses on many neighboring Purkinje cells unlike the sparse pattern of innervation in later lifeClimbing fibers add many synapses onto a few of their Purkinje targets before the pruning stage in a rich-get-richer type processThe synapse sizes of strengthened and weakened climbing fiber inputs are indistinguishable.Exuberant branching of climbing fiber axons in early postnatal life appears to be economical because the numbers of axons and Purkinje cells in a local region match, ensuring that each axon can establish a long-lasting connection thereBLURBHigh-resolution serial electron microscopy reconstructions reveal that climbing fiber-Purkinje cell synaptic refinement in the developing cerebellum begins with significant synapse addition. Climbing fibers focus their synapses onto a smaller number of Purkinje cells by selectively adding synapses onto some target cells. All axons that project to a region in development play a role in the final connectivity.


1975 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 301-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saburo Kawaguchi ◽  
Tetsuro Yamamoto ◽  
Noboru Mizuno ◽  
Nobuharu Iwahori

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 2349-2357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Nicholson ◽  
John H. Freeman

The development of synaptic interconnections between the cerebellum and inferior olive, the sole source of climbing fibers, could contribute to the ontogeny of certain forms of motor learning (e.g., eyeblink conditioning). Purkinje cell complex spikes are produced exclusively by climbing fibers and exhibit short- and long-latency activity in response to somatosensory stimulation. Previous studies have demonstrated that evoked short- and long-latency complex spikes generally occur on separate trials and that this response segregation is regulated by inhibitory feedback to the inferior olive. The present experiment tested the hypothesis that complex spikes evoked by periorbital stimulation are regulated by inhibitory feedback from the cerebellum and that this feedback develops between postnatal days (PND) 17 and 24. Recordings from individual Purkinje cell complex spikes in urethan-anesthetized rats indicated that the segregation of short- and long-latency evoked complex spike activity emerges between PND17 and PND24. In addition, infusion of picrotoxin, a GABAA-receptor antagonist, into the inferior olive abolished the response pattern segregation in PND24 rats, producing evoked complex spike response patterns similar to those characteristic of younger rats. These data support the view that cerebellar feedback to the inferior olive, which is exclusively inhibitory, undergoes substantial changes in the same developmental time window in which certain forms of motor learning emerge.


eNeuro ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. ENEURO.0251-20.2020
Author(s):  
Khoa Tran-Anh ◽  
Jingyun Zhang ◽  
Viet Tuan Nguyen-Minh ◽  
Hirofumi Fujita ◽  
Tatsumi Hirata ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 317 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Carletti ◽  
Ian Martin Williams ◽  
Ketty Leto ◽  
Kazunori Nakajima ◽  
Lorenzo Magrassi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Voogd

AbstractGerbrandus Jelgersma published extensively on the (pathological) anatomy of the cerebellum between 1886 and 1934. Based on his observations on the double innervation of the Purkinje cells, he formulated a hypothesis on the function of the cerebellum. Both afferent systems of the cerebellum, the mossy fiber-parallel fiber system and the climbing fibers terminate on the Purkinje cell dendrites. According to Jelgersma, the mossy fiber-parallel fiber system is derived from the pontine nuclei and the inferior olive, and would transmit the movement images derived from the cerebral cortex. Spinocerebellar climbing fibers would transmit information about the execution of the movement. When the Purkinje cell compares these inputs and notices a difference between instruction and execution, it sends a correction through the descending limb of the superior cerebellar peduncle to the anterior horn cells. Jelgersma postulates that this cerebro-cerebellar coordination system shares plasticity with other nervous connections because nerve cell dendritic protrusions possess what he called amoeboid mobility: dendritic protrusions can be extended or retracted and are so able to create new connections or to abolish them. Jelgersma’s theories are discussed against the background of more recent theories of cerebellar function that, similarly, are based on the double innervation of the Purkinje cells. The amoeboid hypothesis is traced to its roots in the late nineteenth century.


2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (24) ◽  
pp. 9987-9992 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hashimoto ◽  
M. Tsujita ◽  
T. Miyazaki ◽  
K. Kitamura ◽  
M. Yamazaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document