Interaction of the C-terminal domain of the E. coli RNA polymerase α subunit with the UP element: recognizing the backbone structure in the minor groove surface11Edited by R. Ebright

2001 ◽  
Vol 306 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Yasuno ◽  
Toshio Yamazaki ◽  
Yoshiyuki Tanaka ◽  
Takashi S Kodama ◽  
Akimasa Matsugami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Minor Groove ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Backbone Structure

scholarly journals Activation by NarL at the Escherichia coli ogt promoter

2020 ◽  
Vol 477 (15) ◽  
pp. 2807-2820
Author(s):  
Patcharawarin Ruanto ◽  
David L. Chismon ◽  
Joanne Hothersall ◽  
Rita E. Godfrey ◽  
David J. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Response Regulator ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Dna Alkyltransferase ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Transcript Initiation

The Escherichia coli NarX/NarL two-component response-regulator system regulates gene expression in response to nitrate ions and the NarL protein is a global transcription factor, which activates transcript initiation at many target promoters. One such target, the E. coli ogt promoter, which controls the expression of an O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase, is dependent on NarL binding to two DNA targets centred at positions −44.5 and −77.5 upstream from the transcript start. Here, we describe ogt promoter derivatives that can be activated solely by NarL binding either at position −44.5 or position −77.5. We show that NarL can also activate the ogt promoter when located at position −67.5. We present data to argue that NarL-dependent activation of transcript initiation at the ogt promoter results from a direct interaction between NarL and a determinant in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit. Footprinting experiments show that, at the −44.5 promoter, NarL and the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit bind to opposite faces of promoter DNA, suggesting an unusual mechanism of transcription activation. Our work suggests new organisations for activator-dependent transcription at promoters and future applications for biotechnology.

scholarly journals Interactions between the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein and the C-terminal domain of the α subunit of RNA polymerase at Class I promoters

1999 ◽  
Vol 337 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma C. LAW ◽  
Nigel J. SAVERY ◽  
Stephen J. W. BUSBY
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Class I ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Up Elements ◽  
Camp Receptor

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is a factor that activates transcription at over 100 target promoters. At Class I CRP-dependent promoters, CRP binds immediately upstream of RNA polymerase and activates transcription by making direct contacts with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit (αCTD). Since αCTD is also known to interact with DNA sequence elements (known as UP elements), we have constructed a series of semi-synthetic Class I CRP-dependent promoters, carrying both a consensus DNA-binding site for CRP and a UP element at different positions. We previously showed that, at these promoters, the CRP–αCTD interaction and the CRP–UP element interaction contribute independently and additively to transcription initiation. In this study, we show that the two halves of the UP element can function independently, and that, in the presence of the UP element, the best location for the DNA site for CRP is position -69.5. This suggests that, at Class I CRP-dependent promoters where the DNA site for CRP is located at position -61.5, the two αCTDs of RNA polymerase are not optimally positioned. Two experiments to test this hypothesis are presented.

scholarly journals Interdependence of Activation at rhaSR by Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein, the RNA Polymerase Alpha Subunit C-Terminal Domain, and RhaR

2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (23) ◽  
pp. 6774-6782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn C. Holcroft ◽  
Susan M. Egan
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Subunit C ◽  
Cyclic Amp Receptor Protein ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Full Activation

ABSTRACT The Escherichia coli rhaSR operon encodes two AraC family transcription activators, RhaS and RhaR, and is activated by RhaR in the presence of l-rhamnose. β-Galactosidase assays of various rhaS-lacZ promoter fusions combined with mobility shift assays indicated that a cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) site located at −111.5 is also required for full activation of rhaSR expression. To address the mechanisms of activation by CRP and the RNA polymerase α-subunit C-terminal domain (α-CTD) at rhaSR, we tested the effects of alanine substitutions in CRP activating regions 1 and 2, overexpression of a truncated version of α (α-Δ235), and alanine substitutions throughout α-CTD. We found that DNA-contacting residues in α-CTD are required for full activation, and for simplicity, we discuss α-CTD as a third activator of rhaSR. CRP and RhaR could each partially activate transcription in the absence of the other two activators, and α-CTD was not capable of activation alone. In the case of CRP, this suggests that this activation involves neither an α-CTD interaction nor cooperative binding with RhaR, while in the case of RhaR, this suggests the likelihood of direct interactions with core RNA polymerase. We also found that CRP, RhaR, and α-CTD each have synergistic effects on activation by the others, suggesting direct or indirect interactions among all three. We have some evidence that the α-CTD–CRP and α-CTD–RhaR interactions might be direct. The magnitude of the synergistic effects was usually greater with just two activators than with all three, suggesting possible redundancies in the mechanisms of activation by CRP, α-CTD, and RhaR.

scholarly journals Exploring the Amino Acid Residue Requirements of the RNA Polymerase (RNAP) α Subunit C-Terminal Domain for Productive Interaction between Spx and RNAP of Bacillus subtilis

2017 ◽  
Vol 199 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cierra A. Birch ◽  
Madison J. Davis ◽  
Lea Mbengi ◽  
Peter Zuber
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Stress Induction ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Codon Substitution

ABSTRACT Bacillus subtilis Spx is a global transcriptional regulator that is conserved among Gram-positive bacteria, in which Spx is required for preventing oxidatively induced proteotoxicity. Upon stress induction, Spx engages RNA polymerase (RNAP) through interaction with the C-terminal domain of the rpoA-encoded RNAP α subunit (αCTD). Previous mutational analysis of rpoA revealed that substitutions of Y263 in αCTD severely impaired Spx-activated transcription. Attempts to substitute alanine for αCTD R261, R268, R289, E255, E298, and K294 were unsuccessful, suggesting that these residues are essential. To determine whether these RpoA residues were required for productive Spx-RNAP interaction, we ectopically expressed the putatively lethal rpoA mutant alleles in the rpoAY263C mutant, where “Y263C” indicates the amino acid change that results from mutation of the allele. By complementation analysis, we show that Spx-bound αCTD amino acid residues are not essential for Spx-activated transcription in vivo but that R261A, E298A, and E255A mutants confer a partial defect in NaCl-stress induction of Spx-controlled genes. In addition, strains expressing rpoAE255A are defective in disulfide stress resistance and produce RNAP having a reduced affinity for Spx. The E255 residue corresponds to Escherichia coli αD259, which has been implicated in αCTD-σ70 interaction (σ70 R603, corresponding to R362 of B. subtilis σA). However, the combined rpoAE255A and sigAR362A mutations have an additive negative effect on Spx-dependent expression, suggesting the residues' differing roles in Spx-activated transcription. Our findings suggest that, while αCTD is essential for Spx-activated transcription, Spx is the primary DNA-binding determinant of the Spx-αCTD complex. IMPORTANCE Though extensively studied in Escherichia coli, the role of αCTD in activator-stimulated transcription is largely uncharacterized in Bacillus subtilis. Here, we conduct phenotypic analyses of putatively lethal αCTD alanine codon substitution mutants to determine whether these residues function in specific DNA binding at the Spx-αCTD-DNA interface. Our findings suggest that multisubunit RNAP contact to Spx is optimal for activation while Spx fulfills the most stringent requirement of upstream promoter binding. Furthermore, several αCTD residues targeted for mutagenesis in this study are conserved among many bacterial species and thus insights on their function in other regulatory systems may be suggested herein.

scholarly journals Crystal structure of the in vivo-assembled Bacillus subtilis Spx/RNA polymerase α subunit C-terminal domain complex

2009 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 352-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Lamour ◽  
Lars F. Westblade ◽  
Elizabeth A. Campbell ◽  
Seth A. Darst
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Subunit C ◽  
Terminal Domain

scholarly journals NusA Interaction with the α Subunit of E. coli RNA Polymerase Is via the UP Element Site and Releases Autoinhibition

Structure ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 945-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Schweimer ◽  
Stefan Prasch ◽  
Pagadala Santhanam Sujatha ◽  
Mikhail Bubunenko ◽  
Max E. Gottesman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
E Coli

ELECTROSTATIC PROPERTIES OF PROMOTER RECOGNIZED BYE. COLIRNA POLYMERASE Eσ70

2006 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 455-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANATOLY A. SOROKIN ◽  
ALEXANDR A. OSYPOV ◽  
TIMUR R. DZHELYADIN ◽  
PETR M. BESKARAVAINY ◽  
SVETLANA G. KAMZOLOVA
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Promoter Sequences ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Adp Ribosylation ◽  
Electrostatic Properties ◽  
Differential Recognition ◽  
T4 Phage

A comparative analysis of electrostatic patterns for 359 σ70-specific promoters and 359 nonpromoter regions on electrostatic map of Escherichia coli genome was carried out. It was found that DNA is not a uniformly charged molecule. There are some local inhomogeneities in its electrostatic profile which correlate with promoter sequences. Electrostatic patterns of promoter DNAs can be specified due to the presence of some distinctive motifs which differ for different promoter groups and may be involved as signal elements in differential recognition of various promoters by the enzyme. Some specific electrostatic elements which are responsible for modulating promoter activities due to ADP-ribosylation of RNA polymerase α-subunit were found in far upstream regions of T4 phage early promoters and E. coli ribosomal promoters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document