Effects of the Benzodiazepine Lorazepam on Monitoring and Control Processes in Semantic Memory

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyne Massin-Krauss ◽  
Elisabeth Bacon ◽  
Jean-Marie Danion
Keyword(s):  
Semantic Memory ◽  
Monitoring And Control ◽  
Control Processes ◽  
And Control

Preserved monitoring and control processes in temporal lobe epilepsy.

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 775-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar Andrés ◽  
Giuliana Mazzoni ◽  
Charlotte E. Howard
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Lobe Epilepsy ◽  
Temporal Lobe ◽  
Monitoring And Control ◽  
Control Processes ◽  
And Control

scholarly journals Evaluating information-seeking approaches to metacognition

2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathon D. Crystal ◽  
Allison L. Foote
Keyword(s):  
Information Seeking ◽  
Corrective Action ◽  
Default Rule ◽  
Monitoring And Control ◽  
Control Processes ◽  
Information Monitoring ◽  
Knowing That ◽  
Simple Alternative ◽  
Alternative Hypotheses ◽  
And Control

Abstract Metacognition has been divided into information monitoring and control processes. Monitoring involves knowing that you know or do not know some information without taking corrective action. Control involves taking corrective action based on the knowledge that you know or do not know some information. In comparative metacognition, considerable attention has been paid toward critically assessing putative evidence for information monitoring in non-human animals. However, less attention has been paid toward critically evaluating evidence for control processes in animals. We briefly review a critique of information-monitoring in animals. Next, we apply these concepts to a number of studies that focus on information seeking in animals. The main type of evidence for control processes in animals come from tube tipping experiments. Before having the opportunity to search for the bait in these experiments, the subject sometimes observes opaque tubes being baited but is sometimes prevented from seeing the baiting. The observations that the subjects look more if baiting was not seen and are more accurate if baiting was seen have been taken as evidence for metacognition in information-seeking experiments. We propose simple alternative hypotheses that are sufficient to explain putative evidence for information seeking in animals without positing metacognition. The alternative explanation focuses on two relatively simple principles: First, an animal has a default “look before you go” response which supersedes random searches in space. Second, spatially guided behavior follows a default rule of “go where something good is.” These principles can explain the results of tube tipping experiments without proposing metacognition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document