A HARTREE–FOCK NUCLEAR MASS TABLE

2001 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. GORIELY ◽  
F. TONDEUR ◽  
J.M. PEARSON
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Mass ◽  
Hartree Fock

A Hartree-Fock nuclear mass formula

2003 ◽  
pp. 15-18
Author(s):  
J. M. Pearson ◽  
S. Goriely ◽  
M. Samyn
Keyword(s):  
Mass Formula ◽  
Nuclear Mass ◽  
Hartree Fock

A Hartree-Fock nuclear mass formula

2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 13-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Pearson ◽  
S. Goriely ◽  
M. Samyn
Keyword(s):  
Mass Formula ◽  
Nuclear Mass ◽  
Hartree Fock

Nuclear mass formula via an approximation to the Hartree—Fock method

1995 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Aboussir ◽  
J.M. Pearson ◽  
A.K. Dutta ◽  
F. Tondeur
Keyword(s):  
Mass Formula ◽  
Nuclear Mass ◽  
Hartree Fock

First Gogny-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov Nuclear Mass Model

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Goriely ◽  
S. Hilaire ◽  
M. Girod ◽  
S. Péru
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Mass ◽  
Mass Model ◽  
Hartree Fock

Nuclear Mass Dependence of the Dirac–Breit–Pauli Hamiltonian

1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 536-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Karwowski ◽  
Serafin Fraga
Keyword(s):  
Mass Effect ◽  
Mass Dependence ◽  
Neutral Atoms ◽  
Nuclear Mass ◽  
Specific Mass ◽  
Hartree Fock ◽  
Relativistic Mass ◽  
Mass Correction ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
Mass Dependent

The nuclear mass dependent (relativistic, specific, and normal) corrections for many electron atoms are discussed. Numerical values, determined from Hartree–Fock functions for all the neutral atoms from helium through nobelium, show that the relativistic mass correction, never included in actual calculations, is of the same order of magnitude as the specific mass effect.

The Gogny-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov nuclear-mass model

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Goriely ◽  
S. Hilaire ◽  
M. Girod ◽  
S. Péru
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Mass ◽  
Mass Model ◽  
Hartree Fock

Study of charge transfer in FeTi

1983 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 296-297
Author(s):  
J. Taft∅
Keyword(s):  
Charge Transfer ◽  
Charge Distribution ◽  
Electron Scattering ◽  
Periodic System ◽  
Electron Distribution ◽  
Scattering Amplitude ◽  
Transition Elements ◽  
Hartree Fock ◽  
Cscl Structure ◽  
The Right

It is well known that for reflections corresponding to large interplanar spacings (i.e., sin θ/λ small), the electron scattering amplitude, f, is sensitive to the ionicity and to the charge distribution around the atoms. We have used this in order to obtain information about the charge distribution in FeTi, which is a candidate for storage of hydrogen. Our goal is to study the changes in electron distribution in the presence of hydrogen, and also the ionicity of hydrogen in metals, but so far our study has been limited to pure FeTi. FeTi has the CsCl structure and thus Fe and Ti scatter with a phase difference of π into the 100-ref lections. Because Fe (Z = 26) is higher in the periodic system than Ti (Z = 22), an immediate “guess” would be that Fe has a larger scattering amplitude than Ti. However, relativistic Hartree-Fock calculations show that the opposite is the case for the 100-reflection. An explanation for this may be sought in the stronger localization of the d-electrons of the first row transition elements when moving to the right in the periodic table. The tabulated difference between fTi (100) and ffe (100) is small, however, and based on the values of the scattering amplitude for isolated atoms, the kinematical intensity of the 100-reflection is only 5.10-4 of the intensity of the 200-reflection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document