A new live trap for pocket gophers

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas B. Moore ◽  
Sarah I. Duncan ◽  
Elizabeth I. Parsons ◽  
J. T. Pynne ◽  
James D. Austin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pocket Gophers ◽  
Live Trap

A Live Trap for Pocket Gophers

1972 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Baker ◽  
Stephen L. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Pocket Gophers ◽  
Live Trap

A Live Trap for Pocket Gophers

1952 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter E. Howard
Keyword(s):  
Pocket Gophers ◽  
Live Trap

A Live Trap for Pocket Gophers

1966 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 729-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. Sargeant
Keyword(s):  
Pocket Gophers ◽  
Live Trap

Live Trap for Pocket Gophers

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B. Connior ◽  
Thomas S. Risch
Keyword(s):  
Pocket Gophers ◽  
Live Trap

scholarly journals Evaluation of Physical Barriers to Protect Ponderosa Pine Seedlings from Pocket Gophers

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Pipas ◽  
Gary W. Witmer
Keyword(s):  
Pinus Ponderosa ◽  
Ponderosa Pine ◽  
Seedling Mortality ◽  
Pocket Gophers ◽  
Thomomys Talpoides ◽  
Pine Seedlings ◽  
Physical Barriers ◽  
Growth Of Seedlings ◽  
Medium Weight ◽  
Better Than

Abstract A 2 yr study on the Rogue River and Mt. Hood National Forests in Oregon evaluated physical barriers for protection of Pinus ponderosa seedlings against damage by Thomomys talpoides. Seedlings protected with one of three weights of: (1) plastic mesh tubing (Vexar®) or (2) sandpapertubing (Durite®) were evaluated against control seedlings. On the Rogue River sites, Vexar® seedlings had the highest survival (62.6%), followed by the controls (59.1%), then Durite® seedlings (17.9%). Gophers were the primary cause of death for the Vexar® seedlings, versus desiccation for the Durite® seedlings. On the Mt. Hood sites, heavyweight Vexar® seedlings had the highest survival (35.4%), medium-weight Durite® seedlings the lowest (2.7%). Seedling mortality caused by gophers was highest for controls (70.2%), followed by light-weight (62.2%) and heavy-weight (53.9%) Vexar® treatments. Overall survival was low (Rogue River = 42%, Mt. Hood = 19.8%). Growth was greatest for the control seedlings but only significantly greater than growth of Durite® seedlings on the Rogue River sites. Growth of seedlings was not compromised by the Vexar® tubing. Although neither type of tubing was highly protective, Vexar® tubes performed better than Durite® tubes. West. J. Appl. For. 14(3):164-168.

Ecology and Distribution of Pocket Gophers (Geomyidae) in Colorado

Ecology ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Pocket Gophers

Serum Protein Patterns in Pocket Gophers

1968 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinrich Bongardt ◽  
Voit B. Richens ◽  
Walter E. Howard
Keyword(s):  
Serum Protein ◽  
Protein Patterns ◽  
Pocket Gophers

scholarly journals Capsicum-Laden Soils Decrease Contact Time by Northern Pocket Gophers

1999 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray T Sterner ◽  
Kelly A Hollenbeck ◽  
Stephen A Shumake
Keyword(s):  
Contact Time ◽  
Pocket Gophers
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document