scholarly journals The utility of patient‐reported outcome measures in mental health

2022 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Roe ◽  
Mike Slade ◽  
Nev Jones
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Do CAMHS collect less PROM data from certain sociodemographic groups?

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Outcome Monitoring ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Low Rate

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are routinely used to inform clinicians and policymakers on clinical need and treatment efficacy. Yet despite their great value and utility, it seems that there is a low rate of outcome monitoring in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS).

scholarly journals Predictors of Pain and Function Before Knee Arthroscopy

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596711984426 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Matthew C. Bessette ◽  
Robert W. Westermann ◽  
Alan Davis ◽  
Lutul Farrow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Knee Arthroscopy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Female Sex ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Surgical Data

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used to measure knee pain and functional impairment. When structural abnormality is identified on examination and imaging, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and chondroplasty are commonly indicated for treatment in the setting of pain and decreased function. Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between patient characteristics, mental health, intraoperative findings, and patient-reported outcome measures at the time of knee arthroscopy. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between February 2015 and October 2016, patients aged 40 years and older who were undergoing routine knee arthroscopy for meniscal and cartilage abnormality, without reconstructive or restorative procedures, were prospectively enrolled in this study. Routine demographic information was collected, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain, Quality of Life (QoL), and Physical Function Short Form (PS) subscales and the mental and physical component subscales of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12 MCS and VR-12 PCS) were administered preoperatively on the day of surgery. Intraoperative findings were collected in a standardized format. Patient demographics, intraoperative findings, and the VR-12 MCS were used as predictor values, and a multivariate analysis was conducted to assess for relationships with the KOOS and VR-12 as dependent variables. Results: Of 661 eligible patients, baseline patient-reported outcomes and surgical data were used for 638 patients (97%). Lower scores on both subscales of the VR-12 were predicted by female sex, positive smoking history, fewer years of education, and higher body mass index (BMI). All KOOS subscales were negatively affected by lower VR-12 MCS scores, female sex, lower education level, and higher BMI in a statistically meaningful way. Positive smoking history was associated with worse scores on the KOOS-PS. Abnormal synovial status was associated with worse KOOS-Pain. Conclusion: The demographic factors of sex, smoking status, BMI, and education level had an overwhelming impact on preoperative KOOS and VR-12 scores. Of interest, mental health as assessed by the VR-12 MCS was also a consistent predictor of KOOS scores. The only intraoperative finding with a significant association was abnormal synovial status and its effect on KOOS-Pain scores.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Older Veterans Initiating a New Episode of Mental Health Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 307-307
Author(s):  
Jenefer Jedele ◽  
Karen Austin ◽  
Sandra Resnick
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Treatment Episode ◽  
Potential Barriers ◽  
Measurement Based Care ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract The VA Measurement Based Care (MBC) in Mental Health (MH) Initiative supports implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for MH treatment planning and shared decision-making as a routine aspect of care. Using VHA administrative data, we identified Veterans initiating a new MH treatment episode (index encounter), i.e. prior 6-months without VHA MH encounters. We compare MH diagnoses, medications, and encounters during the 6-months from and including the index encounter by age (50-64; 65-79; 80+) between Veterans receiving 1 or more measures (PROM) to those receiving none (noPROM). The percentage of PROM Veterans decreased with age: 26.7% (50-64); 18.5% (65-79); 12.5% (80+). Consistent across age, PROM Veterans had more encounters than noPROM Veterans. In the year before treatment initiation, a smaller percentage of PROM Veterans had multiple MH diagnoses (21.0% v. 29.1%). At treatment initiation, both groups were equally likely to have multiple diagnoses (20.7% v. 20.1%); a higher percentage of the noPROM group were diagnosed with schizophrenia (3.8% v. 1.0%), bipolar (4.5% v. 2.2%), or PTSD (29.2% v. 21.8%). Substance use disorder and major depression were more prevalent in the PROM group. These patterns held across age categories. A smaller percentage of PROM Veterans had been prescribed psychotropic medication during the index encounter (32.8% v. 42.8%). For PROM Veterans, an average of 3 measures were received 1.5 months apart. The number of measures declined and the interval between measures increased with age. Potential barriers and possible efforts to target the use of PROMs with older Veteran patients are discussed.

scholarly journals Using Feedback From Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Mental Health Services: A Scoping Study and Typology

2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian U. Krägeloh ◽  
Karol J. Czuba ◽  
D. Rex Billington ◽  
Paula Kersten ◽  
Richard J. Siegert
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Scoping Study ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcome measures in community mental health teams: pragmatic evaluation of PHQ-9, GAD-7 and SWEMWBS

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 221-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Blenkiron ◽  
Lucy Goldsmith
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Return Rates ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Patient Health

Aims and methodWe evaluated routine use, acceptability and response rates for the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) and Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) within adult community mental health teams. Measures were repeated 3 months later. Professionals recorded the setting, refusal rates and cluster diagnosis.ResultsA total of 245 patients completed 674 measures, demonstrating good initial return rates (81%), excellent scale completion (98–99%) and infrequent refusal/unsuitability (11%). Only 32 (13%) returned follow-up measures. Significant improvements occurred in functioning (P = 0.01), PHQ-9 (P = 0.02) and GAD-7 (P = 0.003) scores (Cohen's d = 0.52–0.77) but not in SWEMWBS (P = 0.91) scores. Supercluster A had higher initial PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores (P < 0.001) and lower SWEMWBS scores (P = 0.003) than supercluster B. Supercluster C showed the greatest functional impairment (P = 0.003).Clinical implicationsPHQ-9 and GAD-7 appear acceptable as patient-reported outcome measures in community mental health team. SWEMWBS seems insensitive to change. National outcome programmes should ensure good follow-up rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document