scholarly journals Simultaneous confidence bands for the mean of functional data

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Degras
Keyword(s):  
Functional Data ◽  
Confidence Bands ◽  
Simultaneous Confidence Bands ◽  
The Mean

scholarly journals Basis Expansions for Functional Snippets

Biometrika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenhua Lin ◽  
Jane-Ling Wang ◽  
Qixian Zhong
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Convergence Rate ◽  
Functional Data Analysis ◽  
Functional Data ◽  
Covariance Function ◽  
Covariance Estimation ◽  
Simulation Studies ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Covariance Functions ◽  
The Mean

Summary Estimation of mean and covariance functions is fundamental for functional data analysis. While this topic has been studied extensively in the literature, a key assumption is that there are enough data in the domain of interest to estimate both the mean and covariance functions. In this paper, we investigate mean and covariance estimation for functional snippets in which observations from a subject are available only in an interval of length strictly (and often much) shorter than the length of the whole interval of interest. For such a sampling plan, no data is available for direct estimation of the off-diagonal region of the covariance function. We tackle this challenge via a basis representation of the covariance function. The proposed estimator enjoys a convergence rate that is adaptive to the smoothness of the underlying covariance function, and has superior finite-sample performance in simulation studies.

Assessing bias, precision, and agreement in method comparison studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 778-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Taffé
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Method ◽  
Method Comparison ◽  
Estimation Procedure ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Confidence Bands ◽  
The Other ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Simultaneous Confidence Bands ◽  
Index Of Agreement

Recently, a new estimation procedure has been developed to assess bias and precision of a new measurement method, relative to a reference standard. However, the author did not develop confidence bands around the bias and standard deviation curves. Therefore, the goal in this paper is to extend this methodology in several important directions. First, by developing simultaneous confidence bands for the various parameters estimated to allow formal comparisons between different measurement methods. Second, by proposing a new index of agreement. Third, by providing a series of new graphs to help the investigator to assess bias, precision, and agreement between the two measurement methods. The methodology requires repeated measurements on each individual for at least one of the two measurement methods. It works very well to estimate the differential and proportional biases, even with as few as two to three measurements by one of the two methods and only one by the other. The repeated measurements need not come from the reference standard but from either measurement methods. This is a great advantage as it may sometimes be more feasible to gather repeated measurements with the new measurement method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document