A new approach for estimating ocean‐surface wind speed using an SMAP L‐band radiometer

Weather ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neerja Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Surface Wind ◽  
Ocean Surface ◽  
Surface Wind Speed ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Ocean Surface Wind ◽  
L Band ◽  
Band Radiometer

Ocean surface wind speed retrieval from C-band quad-polarized SAR measurements at optimal spatial resolution

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-164
Author(s):  
He Fang ◽  
William Perrie ◽  
Gaofeng Fan ◽  
Tao Xie ◽  
Jingsong Yang
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Surface Wind ◽  
Ocean Surface ◽  
Surface Wind Speed ◽  
Ocean Surface Wind

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Ocean Surface Wind Speed Change following the Super Typhoon from Space-Borne GNSS-Reflectometry

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongsu Liu ◽  
Shuanggen Jin ◽  
Qingyun Yan
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Surface Wind ◽  
Ocean Surface ◽  
Surface Wind Speed ◽  
Wind Speeds ◽  
Mean Error ◽  
Super Typhoon ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ocean Surface Wind

Ocean surface wind speed is an essential parameter for typhoon monitoring and forecasting. However, traditional satellite and buoy observations are difficult to monitor the typhoon due to high cost and low temporal-spatial resolution. With the development of spaceborne GNSS-R technology, the cyclone global navigation satellite system (CYGNSS) with eight satellites in low-earth orbit provides an opportunity to measure the ocean surface wind speed of typhoons. Though observations are made at the extremely efficient spatial and temporal resolution, its accuracy and reliability are unclear in an actual super typhoon case. In this study, the wind speed variations over the life cycle of the 2018 Typhoon Mangkhut from CYGNSS observations were evaluated and compared with European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis-5 (ERA-5). The results show that the overall root-mean-square error (RMSE) of CYGNSS versus ECMWF was 4.12 m/s, the mean error was 1.36 m/s, and the correlation coefficient was 0.96. For wind speeds lower and greater than 15 m/s, the RMSE of CYGNSS versus ECMWF were 1.02 and 4.36 m/s, the mean errors were 0.05 and 1.61 m/s, the correlation coefficients were 0.91 and 0.90, and the average relative errors were 9.8% and 11.6%, respectively. When the typhoon reached a strong typhoon or super typhoon, the RMSE of CYGNSS with respect to ERA-5 from ECMWF was 5.07 m/s; the mean error was 3.57 m/s; the correlation coefficient was 0.52 and the average relative error was 11.0%. The CYGNSS estimation had higher precision for wind speeds below 15 m/s, but degraded when the wind speed was above 15 m/s.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document