OP21.05: Appearance of the posterior fossa in fetuses with spina bifida between 11 + 3 and 13 + 6 weeks of gestation by three dimensional sonography

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (S1) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
M. A. Scheier ◽  
M. Pětroš ◽  
R. Lachmann
2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Scheier ◽  
R. Lachmann ◽  
M. Pětroš ◽  
K. H. Nicolaides

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Carletti ◽  
T. Ghi ◽  
M. Ceccarini ◽  
S. Gabrielli ◽  
A. Perolo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
C. M. Duffy ◽  
A. E. Hill ◽  
A. P. Cosgrove ◽  
I. S. Corry ◽  
R. A. B. Mollan ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 619-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley Lee ◽  
Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa ◽  
Roberto Romero ◽  
Rosa Williams ◽  
Beverley McNie ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Hall ◽  
Yee-Chiung (Peter) Gan

Background: Anatomical localization remains integral to neurosurgery, particularly in the posterior fossa where neuronavigation is less reliable. There have been many attempts to define the location of the transverse- sigmoid sinus junction (TSSJ) using anatomical landmarks, to aid in the placement of the “strategic burr hole” during a retrosigmoid approach. There is a paucity of research allowing direct comparison of such techniques. Methods: Using high-resolution contrast-enhanced cranial computed tomography images, we constructed three-dimensional virtual cranial models. Fifty models (100 sides) were created from a retrospective sample of images performed in a New Zealand population. Ten methods of anatomical localization were applied to each model allowing qualitative and quantitative comparisons. The “key point” was defined as the point on the outer surface of the skull that directly overlaid the junction of the posterior fossa dura, transverse sinus (TS), and sigmoid sinus (SS). The proximity of each method to this “key point” was compared quantitatively, in addition to other descriptive observations. TSSJ localization methods analyzed included: (1) asterion; (2) emissary foramen; (3) Lang and Samii; (4) Day; (5) Rhoton; (6) Avci; (7) Ribas; (8) Tubbs; (9) Li; and (10) Teranishi. Results: Mean distance to the “key point” showed two tiers of accuracy, those <10 mm, and those >10 mm: Li (6.3 mm), Ribas (6.6 mm), Tubbs (6.8 mm), Teranishi (7.8 mm), Day (8.4 mm), emissary foramen (12.0 mm), Avci (13.0 mm), asterion (13.9 mm), Lang and Samii (15.6 mm), and Rhoton (17.4 mm). The asterion would most frequently overlie the TS (63%) and was often supratentorial (14%). Conclusion: Each method has a unique profile of dura or sinus exposure. There are significant differences in the accuracy of localization of the TSSJ among anatomical localization methods.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (S1) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
R. Garcia Rodriguez ◽  
A. Romero Requejo ◽  
R. Garcia‐Delgado ◽  
J. Segura Gonzalez ◽  
M. De Luis Alvarado ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document