GI-RADS reporting system for ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses in clinical practice: a prospective multicenter study

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Amor ◽  
J. L. Alcázar ◽  
H. Vaccaro ◽  
M. León ◽  
A. Iturra
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Reporting System ◽  
Prospective Multicenter Study ◽  
Adnexal Masses ◽  
Ultrasound Evaluation

Analysis of the results of ERAS protocol in real-life clinical practice AFTER radical cystectomy (the first prospective multicenter study in Russia)

Urologiia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6_2020 ◽  
pp. 60-66
Author(s):  
S.V. Kotov Kotov ◽  
A.L. Khachatryan Khachatryan ◽  
D.P. Kotova Kotova ◽  
R.I. Guspanov Guspanov ◽  
E.A. Bezrukov Bezrukov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Prospective Multicenter Study ◽  
Eras Protocol

PONDx, Prospective Multicenter Study of the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer assay: real-life utilization in French clinical practice

The Breast ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S60-S61
Author(s):  
E. Curtit ◽  
J.-M. Vannetzel ◽  
S. Catala ◽  
J.-C. Darmon ◽  
D. Spaeth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Prospective Multicenter Study

scholarly journals The Development of the “Telislife” Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Telephone Use in Cochlear Implant Users

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Adrien Bolzer ◽  
Michel Hoen ◽  
Bettina Montaut-Verient ◽  
Charles Hoffmann ◽  
Marine Ardoint ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Monosyllabic Word ◽  
Prospective Multicenter Study ◽  
Important Landmark

Purpose For cochlear implant users, the ability to use the telephone is often seen as an important landmark during rehabilitation and an indicator of cochlear implant benefit. The goal of this study was to develop a short questionnaire exploring the ability to use the telephone in cochlear implant users, named Telislife, and test it in a group of experienced users. Method This prospective multicenter study was based on the completion of self-administrated questionnaires. The Telislife includes 20 items using a 5-point Likert scale for answers. Speech recognition scores were obtained with monosyllabic word lists at 70 dB HL. Quality of life was evaluated with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. This study included 55 adult patients wearing a cochlear implant for over 1 year. Results The Telislife questionnaire showed excellent reliability (Cronbach's α = .91). A significant correlation was found between Telislife scores and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire scores ( r = .69, p < .001) and speech recognition scores ( r = .35, p = .007). Conclusion Given significant correlations between Telislife scores and both speech recognition and quality of life and given its short form, the Telislife questionnaire appears to be a reliable tool to evaluate cochlear implant outcomes in clinical practice. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13322873

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document