scholarly journals P15.05: Bilateral ectopic pregnancy

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 600-600
Author(s):  
M. Rasidaki ◽  
M. Papadaki ◽  
S. Mitas ◽  
G. Arvanitis ◽  
N. Paikopoulos ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 490-492
Author(s):  
P. Sinha ◽  
A. Koumousidis ◽  
M. Carr ◽  
C. Sofoudis

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 612-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. V. Shenoy ◽  
V. Choudhary ◽  
R. W. H. Giles

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 887-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigal Klipstein ◽  
Selwyn P Oskowitz

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 202-204
Author(s):  
Andrew Haddad ◽  
Diana Ho ◽  
Damali Campbell

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
J. P. Twigg ◽  
G. K. Awadzi ◽  
F. N. McLeod

1988 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 719-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Olive ◽  
Norman Taylor ◽  
George E. Cothran ◽  
Robert S. Schenken

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Quinton Katler ◽  
Lindsey Pflugner ◽  
Anjali Martinez

Bilateral ectopic pregnancy is a rare phenomenon which is found with increased frequency when using assisted reproductive technology (ART). This diagnosis is most often made incidentally and intraoperatively, as ultrasound and serial β-hCG trends have shown poor efficacy for accurate diagnosis. Management of bilateral ectopic pregnancies is most commonly reported using bilateral surgical removal of the ectopic pregnancy (salpingostomy and/or salpingectomy). We present a case of an ART patient with incidentally found bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancies, where multiple management strategies including medical and surgical techniques were used concurrently which resulted in a subsequent spontaneous intrauterine pregnancy. While the standard of care is difficult to establish, we recommend individualizing management decisions based on the patient’s reproductive goals and overall risk profile.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
José F. De Los Ríos ◽  
Juan D. Castañeda ◽  
Aguirre Miryam

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document