scholarly journals OC17.02: Twin–twin transfusion syndrome with and without selective fetal growth restriction: perinatal survival and prediction of donor demise

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (S1) ◽  
pp. 49-50
Author(s):  
R.V. Donepudi ◽  
E. Krispin ◽  
H. Mustafa ◽  
J. Espinoza ◽  
A. Nassr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Perinatal Survival

scholarly journals Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome with and without Selective Fetal Growth Restriction Prior to Fetoscopic Laser Surgery: Short and Long-Term Outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Groene ◽  
Tollenaar ◽  
van Klink ◽  
Haak ◽  
Klumper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Laser Surgery ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Separate Analysis ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Perinatal Survival

As twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) are both prevalent complications of monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies, its coexistence is not uncommon. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short and long-term outcome in TTTS with and without sFGR prior to fetoscopic laser coagulation. All TTTS cases treated with laser surgery at our center between 2001–2019 were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of sFGR, defined as an estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th centile. We compared two groups: TTTS-only and TTTS + sFGR. Primary outcomes were perinatal survival and long-term severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). Of the 527 pregnancies eligible for analysis, 40.8% (n = 215) were categorized as TTTS-only and 59.2% (n = 312) as TTTS + sFGR. Quintero stage at presentation was higher in the TTTS + sFGR group compared to the TTTS-only group (57% compared to 44% stage III). Separate analysis of donors showed significantly lower perinatal survival for donors in the TTTS + sFGR group (72% (224/311) compared to 81% (173/215), p = 0.027). Severe NDI at follow-up in long-term survivors in the TTTS-only and TTTS + sFGR group was present in 7% (13/198) and 9% (27/299), respectively (p = 0.385). Both sFGR (OR 1.5;95% CI 1.1–2.0, p = 0.013) and lower gestational age at laser (OR 1.1;95% CI 1.0–1.1, p = 0.001) were independently associated with decreased perinatal survival. Thus, sFGR prior to laser surgery is associated with a more severe initial presentation and decreased donor perinatal survival. The long-term outcome was not affected.

FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION WITH EARLY AND LATE MANIFESTATION, PROGNOSTIC MARKERS

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
Yakubova D.I.
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Late Manifestation ◽  
Late Form ◽  
Early Manifestation

Objective of the study: Comprehensive assessment of risk factors, the implementation of which leads to FGR with early and late manifestation. To evaluate the results of the first prenatal screening: PAPP-A, B-hCG, made at 11-13 weeks. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study included 110 pregnant women. There were 48 pregnant women with early manifestation of fetal growth restriction, 62 pregnant women with late manifestation among them. Results of the study: The risk factors for the formation of the FGR are established. Statistically significant differences in the indicators between groups were not established in the analyses of structures of extragenital pathology. According to I prenatal screening, there were no statistical differences in levels (PAPP-A, b-hCG) in the early and late form of FGR.

INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION - A REVIEW ARTICLE

2018 ◽  
pp. 184-195
Author(s):  
Minh Son Pham ◽  
Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen ◽  
Dinh Vinh Tran
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Intrauterine Growth ◽  
No Gold Standard

Small for gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) is difficult to define exactly. In this pregnancy condition, the fetus does not reach its biological growth potential as a consequence of impaired placental function, which may be because of a variety of factors. Fetuses with FGR are at risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality, and poor long-term health outcomes, such as impaired neurological and cognitive development, and cardiovascular and endocrine diseases in adulthood. At present no gold standard for the diagnosis of SGA/FGR exists. The first aim of this review is to: summarize areas of consensus and controversy between recently published national guidelines on small for gestational age or fetal growth restriction; highlight any recent evidence that should be incorporated into existing guidelines. Another aim to summary a number of interventions which are being developed or coming through to clinical trial in an attempt to improve fetal growth in placental insufficiency. Key words: fetal growth restriction (FGR), Small for gestational age (SGA)

The secrets of placental mosaicism: clinical observation of the full form of confined placental trisomy 22 and literature review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.V. Komarova, A.A. Nikiforenko, A.V. Fedunyak
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Clinical Observation ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Full Form ◽  
Placental Mosaicism ◽  
In Pregnancy

Literature reports of placental mosaicism, including trisomy 22, were analyzed. The chance of correlation of placental aneuploidy with fetus aneuploidy, also the probability of complications in pregnancy and fetal growth restriction and postnatal patients growth in the cases of confined placental mosaicism, were demonstrated. The case of prenatal diagnosis of confined placental mosaicism of trisomy 22 with favorable outcome is presented. The necessity of cytogenic assay of amniocytes and fetal lymphocytes in the case of placental heteroploidy diagnosis was emphasized.

scholarly journals OC25.06: Maternal hemodynamics in hypertensive pregnancies with and without fetal growth restriction

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (S1) ◽  
pp. 66-66
Author(s):  
H. Perry ◽  
J. Binder ◽  
J. Gutiérrez ◽  
B. Thilaganathan ◽  
A. Khalil
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document