scholarly journals Application of International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group consensus in preoperative ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of deep pelvic endometriosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Indrielle‐Kelly ◽  
F. Frühauf ◽  
M. Fanta ◽  
A. Burgetova ◽  
D. Lavu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Group Consensus ◽  
Pelvic Endometriosis ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Deep Endometriosis ◽  
Preoperative Ultrasound ◽  
Deep Pelvic Endometriosis

scholarly journals Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
T. Indrielle-Kelly ◽  
D. Fischerova ◽  
P. Hanuš ◽  
F. Frühauf ◽  
M. Fanta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Uterosacral Ligament ◽  
Learning Curves ◽  
Pelvic Endometriosis ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Deep Endometriosis ◽  
Kappa Agreement ◽  
Radiology Trainee

Purpose. We aimed to compare the learning curves of an ultrasound trainee (obstetrics and gynecology resident) and a radiology trainee when assessing pelvic endometriosis. Methods. Consecutive patients with suspected endometriosis were prospectively enrolled in a tertiary center. They underwent an ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively, which was reported according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group consensus. Trainees reported on deep endometriosis (DE), endometriomas, frozen pelvis, and adenomyosis. Using the Kappa agreement, their findings were compared against laparoscopy/histology and expert findings. The learning curve was considered positive when performance improved over time and indeterminate in all other cases. Results. Reports from thirty-five women were divided chronologically into 3 equal blocks to assess the learning curve. For ultrasound, trainee versus expert showed a positive learning curve in overall pelvic DE assessment. There was an excellent agreement for adenomyosis (Kappa=1.00, p=0.09), frozen pelvis (Kappa=0.90, p=0.01), bowel (Kappa=1.00, p=0.01), and bladder DE assessment (Kappa=1.00, p=0.01). Endometrioma and uterosacral ligament assessment showed an indeterminate curve. For radiology, trainee versus expert showed a positive curve when detecting adenomyosis (Kappa=0.42, p=0.09) and bladder DE (Kappa=1.00, p=0.01). The assessment of endometriomas, frozen pelvis, overall pelvic DE, bowel, and uterosacral ligament DE showed indeterminate curve. Agreement between trainees and laparoscopy/histology showed a positive curve for bladder (both) and frozen pelvis (ultrasound only). Conclusion. A positive learning curve can be seen in some areas of pelvic endometriosis mapping after as little as 35 cases, but a bigger caseload is required to demonstrate the curve in full. The ultrasound trainee had positive learning curves in more anatomical locations (bladder, adenomyosis, overall bowel DE, frozen pelvis) than the radiology trainee (bladder, adenomyosis), which could be down to individual factors, differences in training, or the imaging method itself.

scholarly journals Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: Comparison between Trans-Vaginal Sonography, Rectal Endoscopy Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Noventa ◽  
Marco Scioscia ◽  
Michele Schincariol ◽  
Francesco Cavallin ◽  
Giovanni Pontrelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Imaging Modalities ◽  
Transvaginal Sonography ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Pelvic Endometriosis ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Deep Pelvic Endometriosis

Objectives: A meta-analysis, with a head-to-head approach, was carried out to compare the three most common techniques for a deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE) diagnosis. We focused on: transvaginal-sonography (TVS), magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI), and rectal-endoscopy-sonography (RES). Methods: Electronic databases were searched from their inception until December 2018. All prospective and well-defined retrospective studies carried out in tertiary referral centers were considered. This review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Synthesizing Evidence from Diagnostic Accuracy Tests (SEDATE) guidelines. We considered only papers in which at least two imaging modalities were compared in the same set of patients (head-to-head approach). Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) was performed separately for each location of interest. Bivariate or univariate approach has been applied when appropriate. We analyze the DTA of TVS vs. MRI, TVS vs. RES, and MRI vs. RES. Results: Our meta-analysis (17 studies included) showed high-to-moderate DTA of TVS for all endometriosis locations (apart from recto-vaginal septum (RVS)) that were not statistically different from MRI and RES for those localized in the posterior compartment. RES results were more accurate than MRI for RS lesions but less accurate than TVS for other pelvic locations, except for RVS. Conclusions: All approaches provide good accuracy with specific strong points. Ultrasonography demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy not inferior to MRI and RES; therefore, it must be considered the primary approach for DPE diagnosis. MRI has to be considered as a valuable approach in settings where highly skilled sonographers are not available. Keypoints: (1) We confirmed the non-inferiority of TVS compared to MRI and RES for the diagnosis of specific pelvic anatomic location of endometriosis lesions. (2) Ultrasonography could be considered the primary approach for DPE diagnosis (less invasive than RES and less expensive than MRI). (3) MRI has to be considered as a valuable approach in settings where skilled sonographers are not available.

scholarly journals Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography for the prediction of location of deep pelvic endometriosis

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1457-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Bazot ◽  
Carole Bornier ◽  
Gil Dubernard ◽  
Gilles Roseau ◽  
Annie Cortez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Pelvic Endometriosis ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Deep Pelvic Endometriosis

Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic endometriosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-296
Author(s):  
R. Méndez Fernández ◽  
J. Barrera Ortega
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Pelvic Endometriosis ◽  
Resonance Imaging

scholarly journals Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 3092-3097 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Abrao ◽  
M. O. d. C. Goncalves ◽  
J. A. Dias ◽  
S. Podgaec ◽  
L. P. Chamie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Transvaginal Sonography ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Deep Endometriosis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document