scholarly journals OP03.04: Estimation of aneuploidy detection rates based on nuchal translucency and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a cohort study

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (S1) ◽  
pp. 69-70
Author(s):  
A. Khalil ◽  
N. Mahmood ◽  
A. Kulkarni ◽  
T. Homfray ◽  
A.T. Papageorghiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Nuchal Translucency ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals Estimation of Detection Rates of Aneuploidy in High-Risk Pregnancy Using an Approach Based on Nuchal Translucency and Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: A Cohort Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asma Khalil ◽  
Negar Mahmoodian ◽  
Abhijit Kulkarni ◽  
Tessa Homfray ◽  
Aris Papageorghiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Chorionic Villus ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Nuchal Translucency ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clinically Significant

Objectives: The aim was to investigate aneuploidy detection using an approach based on nuchal translucency (NT) and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Methods: This was a cohort study including 5,306 high-risk pregnancies with NT measurements and chorionic villus samples (CVS) tested for full karyotype. Results: The fetal karyotype was normal in 4,172 (78.6%) cases and abnormal in 1,134 (21.4%), including 1,009 with a likely clinically significant adverse outcome. Universal CVS with full karyotyping would lead to the diagnosis of all clinically significant abnormalities. A policy of relying solely on NIPT would have led to the diagnosis of 88.9% of clinically significant abnormalities. A strategy whereby NIPT is the main method, with CVS reserved for cases with NT ≥3.0 mm, would require CVS in 21.7% of cases, identify 94.8% of significant abnormalities and avoid miscarriage in 41 pregnancies compared to CVS for all. Conclusions: A policy of NIPT for increased-risk cases and CVS with full karyotype if the NT was ≥3.0 mm reduced the risk of miscarriage yet still identified 95% of clinically significant aneuploidy.

scholarly journals The Value of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the Diagnosis of Birth Defects: Insights from a Large Multicentre Study in Southern China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiying Cai ◽  
Na Lin ◽  
Xuemei Chen ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Min Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multicentre Study ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Southern China ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Large Multicentre Study

Abstract Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a fast, safe, and non-disruptive diagnostic method. At present, few studies have evaluated the screening efficiency of NIPT positive predictive value (PPV) in study subjects. Here, the results of NIPT in pregnant women were retrospectively analysed, and the detection rate, PPV and follow-up data were evaluated to determine its clinical value. A large multicentre study was conducted involving 52,855 pregnant women who received NIPT. Based on gestational age, amniotic fluid or umbilical cord blood were extracted for simultaneous karyotype and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) in NIPT-positive patients. Among the 52,855 cases, 754 were NIPT-positive, with a positivity rate of 1.4%. Karyotype analysis and/or CMA confirmed 323 cases of chromosomal abnormalities, with a PPV of 45.1%. PPV of Trisomy 21 (T21), Trisomy 18 (T18), Trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCA) and copy number variations (CNV) were 78.9%, 35.3%, 22.2%, 36.9% and 32.9%, respectively. The PPV of T21, T18, and T13 increased with age whereas, the PPV of SCA and CNVs had little correlation with age. The PPV was significantly high in patients with advanced age along with an abnormal ultrasound.NIPT had a high PPV for T21, and a low PPV for T13 and T18, while screening for SCA and CNVs showed clinical significance. However, in case of NIPT screening for SCA and CNVs, simultaneous karyotype and CMA should be performed to increase the detection rates. Interventional prenatal diagnosis is still required in NIPT-positive cases to avoid false positives or unnecessary termination of pregnancy.

scholarly journals Noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal microdeletions/microduplications in a cohort of 42,910 single pregnancies with different clinical features

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yibo Chen ◽  
Qi Yu ◽  
Xiongying Mao ◽  
Wei Lei ◽  
Miaonan He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Maternal Plasma ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Cell Free Fetal Dna ◽  
Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies

Abstract Background Since the discovery of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma, it has opened up new approaches for non-invasive prenatal testing. With the development of whole-genome sequencing, small subchromosomal deletions and duplications could be found by NIPT. This study is to review the efficacy of NIPT as a screening test for aneuploidies and CNVs in 42,910 single pregnancies. Methods A total of 42,910 single pregnancies with different clinical features were recruited. The cell-free fetal DNA was directly sequenced. Each of the chromosome aneuploidies and the subchromosomal microdeletions/microduplications of PPV were analyzed. Results A total of 534 pregnancies (1.24%) were abnormal results detected by NIPT, and 403 pregnancies had underwent prenatal diagnosis. The positive predictive value (PPV) for trisomy 21(T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs), and other chromosome aneuploidy was 79.23%, 54.84%, 13.79%, 33.04%, and 9.38% respectively. The PPV for CNVs was 28.99%. The PPV for CNVs ≤ 5 Mb is 20.83%, for within 5–10 Mb 50.00%, for > 10 Mb 27.27% respectively. PPVs of NIPT according to pregnancies characteristics are also different. Conclusion Our data have potential significance in demonstrating the usefulness of NIPT profiling not only for common whole chromosome aneuploidies but also for CNVs. However, this newest method is still in its infancy for CNVs. There is still a need for clinical validation studies with accurate detection rates and false positive rates in clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document