scholarly journals OC20.06: Angiogenic factors versus Doppler evaluation in the third trimester for the identification of late-onset small-for-gestational age births

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (S1) ◽  
pp. 47-48
Author(s):  
S. Triunfo ◽  
M. Parra-Saavedra ◽  
F. Crovetto ◽  
V. Rodriguez-Sureda ◽  
C. Dominguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Angiogenic Factors ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
The Third ◽  
Doppler Evaluation

OP25.08: Angiogenic factors at diagnosis of late-onset small-for-gestational age and histological placental underperfusion

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (S1) ◽  
pp. 123-124
Author(s):  
S. Triunfo ◽  
S.M. Lobmaier ◽  
M. Parra-Saavedra ◽  
F. Crovetto ◽  
E. Gratacós ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Angiogenic Factors

Angiogenic factors at diagnosis of late-onset small-for-gestational age and histological placental underperfusion

Placenta ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 398-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Triunfo ◽  
S. Lobmaier ◽  
M. Parra-Saavedra ◽  
F. Crovetto ◽  
A. Peguero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Angiogenic Factors

Performance of computerized cardiotocography-based short-term variation in late-onset small-for-gestational-age fetuses and reference ranges for the late third trimester

2018 ◽  
Vol 299 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Graupner ◽  
Javier U. Ortiz ◽  
Bernhard Haller ◽  
Annette Wacker-Gussmann ◽  
Renate Oberhoffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Reference Ranges ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Variation

Comparative assessment of informational content of the equations of F.P. Hadlock and the computer program of V.N. Demidov in determination of term of gestation and fetal weight in the III trimester of gestation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Derkach , O.I. Guseva
Keyword(s):  
Computer Program ◽  
High Precision ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Computer Programs ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Informational Content ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
The Third

Objectives: to compare the accuracy of equations F.P. Hadlock and computer programs by V.N. Demidov in determining gestational age and fetal weight in the third trimester of gestation. Materials: 328 patients in terms 36–42 weeks of gestation are examined. Ultrasonography was performed in 0–5 days prior to childbirth. Results: it is established that the average mistake in determination of term of pregnancy when using the equation of F.P. Hadlock made 12,5 days, the computer program of V.N. Demidov – 4,4 days (distinction 2,8 times). The mistake within 4 days, when using the equation of F.P. Hadlock has met on average in 23,1 % of observations, the computer program of V.N. Demidov — 65,9 % (difference in 2,9 times). The mistake more than 10 days, took place respectively in 51,7 and 8,2 % (distinction by 6,3 times). At a comparative assessment of size of a mistake in determination of fetal mass it is established that when using the equation of F.P. Hadlock it has averaged 281,0 g, at application of the computer program of V.N. Demidov — 182,5 g (distinction of 54 %). The small mistake in the mass of a fetus which isn't exceeding 200 g at application of the equation of F.P. Hadlock has met in 48,1 % of cases and the computer program of V.N. Demidov — 64,0 % (distinction of 33,1 %). The mistake exceeding 500 g has been stated in 18 % (F.P. Hadlock) and 4,3 % (V.N. Demidov) respectively (distinction 4,2 times). Conclusions: the computer program of V.N. Demidov has high precision in determination of term of a gestation and mass of a fetus in the III pregnancy.

The sFlt-1 to PlGF Ratio in Pregnant Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Impact of Disease Activity and Sulfasalazine Use

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rugina I Neuman ◽  
Hieronymus T W Smeele ◽  
A H Jan Danser ◽  
Radboud J E M Dolhain ◽  
Willy Visser
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
The Third ◽  
Observational Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Plgf Ratio

Abstract Objectives An elevated sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio has been validated as a significant predictor of preeclampsia, but has not been established in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We explored whether the sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio could be altered due to disease activity in RA, and could be applied in this population to predict preeclampsia. Since sulfasalazine has been suggested to improve the angiogenic imbalance in preeclampsia, we also aimed to examine whether sulfasalazine could affect sFlt-1 or PlGF levels. Methods Making use of a nationwide, observational, prospective cohort study on pregnant women with RA, sFlt-1 and PlGF were measured in the third trimester. A total of 221 women, aged 21–42 years, were included, with a median gestational age of 30 + 3 weeks. Results No differences in sFlt-1 or PlGF were observed between women with high, intermediate or low disease activity (p= 0.07 and p= 0.41), whereas sFlt-1 and PlGF did not correlate with DAS28-CRP score (r=-0.01 and r=-0.05, respectively). Four (2%) women with a sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio ≤38 developed preeclampsia in comparison to three (43%) women with a ratio > 38, corresponding to a negative predictive value of 98.1%. Sulfasalazine users (n = 57) did not show altered levels of sFlt-1 or PlGF in comparison to non-sulfasalazine users (n = 164, p= 0.91 and p= 0.11). Conclusion Our study shows that in pregnant women with RA, the sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio is not altered due to disease activity and a cut-off ≤38 can be used to exclude preeclampsia. Additionally, sulfasalazine use did not affect sFlt-1 or PlGF levels in this population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document