scholarly journals First-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 with different combinations of placental growth factor, free β-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. O. Kagan ◽  
M. Hoopmann ◽  
H. Abele ◽  
R. Alkier ◽  
K. Lüthgens
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Plasma Protein ◽  
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Protein A ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Placental Growth Factor

scholarly journals First Trimester Biochemical Screening for Trisomy 21: The Role of Free Beta hCG, Alpha Fetoprotein and Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein A

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 447-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Spencer ◽  
D A Aitken ◽  
J A Crossley ◽  
G McCaw ◽  
E Berry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Plasma Protein ◽  
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Protein A ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Detection Rates

The potential efficacy of screening for trisomy 21 in the first trimester, using maternal serum markers α fetoprotein, free β human chorionic gonadotropin, unconjugated oestriol and pregnancy associated plasma protein A, was studied in an unselected population of women between the seventh and fourteenth week of gestation. Using a combination of α fetoprotein and free β human chorionic gonadotropin, 53% of affected pregnancies could be identified at a false positive rate of 5%. Unconjugated oestriol and pregnancy associated plasma protein A levels were lower in cases of trisomy 21, but their inclusion with other markers did not significantly improve detection rate. Monitoring the same pregnancies also in the second trimester showed that screening in the first trimester identified the same cases as in the second. We conclude that first trimester screening using free β human chorionic gonadotropin and α fetoprotein, is a viable possibility and will lead to detection rates in excess of 50%. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Four Years' Experience With an Interlaboratory Comparison Program Involving First-Trimester Markers of Down Syndrome

2010 ◽  
Vol 134 (11) ◽  
pp. 1685-1691
Author(s):  
Glenn E. Palomaki ◽  
George J. Knight ◽  
Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian ◽  
Jacob A. Canick ◽  
James E. Haddow
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Plasma Protein ◽  
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Interlaboratory Comparison ◽  
Protein A ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Nuchal Translucency ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation

Abstract Context.—We initiated a voluntary, self-funded interlaboratory comparison program in the fall of 2005 because no proficiency testing program was available to laboratories in North America offering first-trimester, combined serum and ultrasound, Down syndrome screening. Objectives.—To evaluate the first 4 years of the interlaboratory comparison program against stated goals, to identify areas of concern, and to create new initiatives as indicated. Design.—Five serum samples are distributed 3 times a year to be tested for pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, human chorionic gonadotropin or its β subunit, and dimeric inhibin-A; participants convert these results into multiples of the median. Patient histories include nuchal translucency information that enables the calculation of the risk of Down syndrome. Also included are educational components linked to interlaboratory comparison program results. Assessment of integrated (first- and second-trimester markers) risks is accomplished by having participants combine interlaboratory comparison program results with their results from a second-trimester proficiency testing program administered by the College of American Pathologists. Results.—The precision profile for pregnancy-associated plasma protein A shows decreasing coefficients of variation with increasing pregnancy-associated plasma protein A concentrations and multiples of the median (25% to 11% and 30% to 15%, respectively). In contrast, coefficients of variation are a relatively constant 12% throughout the entire range of human chorionic gonadotropin results. On a logarithmic scale, the median coefficient of variation of the risk of Down syndrome is 9%. Conclusions.—Participants in the interlaboratory comparison program reliably measure analytes, compute multiples of the median, and calculate consistent Down syndrome risks. Assays for the measurement of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A are not standardized and are less precise than those for human chorionic gonadotropin. Participants calculate reliable median equations given sonographer-specific sets of paired crown-rump length and nuchal translucency measurements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document