scholarly journals Multinational Firms’ Motivations and Foreign Direct Investment Decisions: An Analysis of the Software and IT and Financial Services Sectors in the Irish Context

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Annan-Diab ◽  
Fragkiskos Filippaios
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Irish Context

Exploring the Social Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Institutional Change

2016 ◽  
pp. 198-214
Author(s):  
Natalya Smith ◽  
Ekaterina Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Institutional Change ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Social Significance ◽  
The Social ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Positive Direct

Despite the vast and growing literature on the economic impact of foreign direct investment (FDI), its social significance is somewhat a neglected issue. Focusing on Russia, this chapter examines the effect of FDI and (formal) institutions (proxied, alternatively, by the [1] accumulated stock of small and medium sized firms or SMEs and [2] number of economic crimes per 100,000 population or corruption) on (informal) institutional change (proxied by the change in the number of violent and property crimes per 100,000 population). The empirical findings provide robust support for a significantly positive direct impact of SMEs, whilst observing a significantly negative effect of corruption and either significantly positive impact of FDI or insignificant effect of multinational firms in this context.

Postwar Japanese Cotton Textile Investment in Brazil, 1955–1980

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-97
Author(s):  
Henri Delanghe
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Textile Industry ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Cotton Textile ◽  
Process Technology ◽  
Japanese Firms ◽  
Cotton Textiles ◽  
Intimate Knowledge ◽  
Second Wave

The literature suggests that cotton textiles should be unattractive for foreign direct investment (FDI). The product is largely undifferentiated; sellers need an intimate knowledge of local markets; and textiles use process technology, which multinational firms cannot monopolize. Indeed, since the 1970s, cotton textiles has been one of the few industries in Brazil in which local capital dominates, joint ventures prevail, and American firms are almost completely absent. Yet, between 1955 and the mid-1970s, Brazil saw significant foreign direct investment in textiles from Japanese firms. There were two successive waves of Japanese investment in the Brazilian cotton textile industry. The first ran from the mid-1950s to the early 1960s. The second took place from the late 1960s to the mid-1970s. Four Japanese textile firms participated in the first wave—Kanebo, Toyobo, Tsuzuki, and Unitika. Four more—Daiwa, Kurabo, Nisshinbo, and Omi—participated in the second wave.

Regime Type and Foreign Direct Investment: A Transaction Cost Economics Approach to the Debate

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin P. Johnson ◽  
Quan Li
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Multinational Corporations ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Joint Venture ◽  
Transaction Cost Economics ◽  
International Political Economy ◽  
Regime Type ◽  
Ownership Type ◽  
Multiple Dimensions

A debate exists in international political economy on the relationship between regime type and foreign direct investment (FDI). The central point of contention focuses on whether multinational firms generally prefer to pursue business ventures in more democratic or autocratic countries. A considerable amount of theory has been developed on this topic; however, the arguments in previous studies lack consistency, and researchers have produced mixed empirical findings. A fundamental weakness in this literature is that while FDI has largely been treated conceptually as a homogeneous aggregate, in reality, it features divergent characteristics on multiple dimensions. Three possible dimensions that FDI can be decomposed on are: greenfield vs. brownfield, ownership type (wholly owned vs. joint venture), and horizontal vs. vertical. The most relevant dimensions to the problem at hand are: greenfield vs. brownfield, and horizontal vs. vertical. Five propositions, based on the notion of asset specificity, other investment attributes, and host nation domestic factors, are derived to predict how regime type might affect four types of FDI: vertical-greenfield; vertical-brownfield; horizontal-greenfield; and horizontal-brownfield. Depending on the type of FDI, multinational corporations may have no regime preference, an autocratic preference, or a democratic preference. This research contributes to empirical international relations theory by providing a useful example on how to resolve a scholarly debate, theoretically, and by laying out testable propositions for future empirical research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document