Reply to: “Comments on behavioral teratogenic effect of methylmercury and d-amphetamine: Meta-analysis and power analysis of data from the Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study of National Center for Toxicological Research” by J. Buelke-Sam et al., J.A. Springer et al., and D.W. Gaylor

Teratology ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Tachibana
Keyword(s):  
Power Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Teratogenic Effect ◽  
Toxicological Research ◽  
Behavioral Teratology

Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis

2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Muncer ◽  
Shirley Taylor ◽  
Mark Craigie
Keyword(s):  
Power Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis

Meta-analysis, power analysis, and the null-hypothesis significance-test procedure

1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Rossi
Keyword(s):  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Power Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Verbal Learning ◽  
Test Procedure ◽  
Significance Test ◽  
Size Estimation ◽  
Null Hypothesis Significance Test ◽  
Effect Size Estimation ◽  
History Of

Chow's (1996) defense of the null-hypothesis significance-test procedure (NHSTP) is thoughtful and compelling in many respects. Nevertheless, techniques such as meta-analysis, power analysis, effect size estimation, and confidence intervals can be useful supplements to NHSTP in furthering the cumulative nature of behavioral research, as illustrated by the history of research on the spontaneous recovery of verbal learning.

The teratogenic effect of carbamazepine: a meta-analysis of 1255 exposures

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Matalon ◽  
S Schechtman ◽  
G Goldzweig ◽  
A Ornoy
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Teratogenic Effect
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document