Evaluation of current seismic design equations for nonstructural components in tall buildings using strong motion records

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 30-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Fathali ◽  
Bret Lizundia
1993 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 739-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhir K. Jain ◽  
Satrajit Das

Strong motion records have been obtained at 13 stations during the Uttarkashi earthquake of October 20, 1991 (magnitude 6.6). A study has been conducted on these time histories to assess the codal provisions in India. Emphasis of the study is on evaluating relative consistency of design provisions for different seismic zones in India. The average response spectra from this earthquake show concentration of significantly more energy in low period range and less energy in high period range. The magnitude of seismic design force for zones I, II, and III is consistent while it is too low for zone IV; no records were obtained in area with shaking intensity corresponding to zone V. It is seen that for buildings in zones I, II, and III, the present design provisions may be lowered either by relaxing the requirement of special ductile detailing, or by reducing the design force. On the other hand, design provisions for zone IV need to be revised upwards.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 213-237
Author(s):  
Miguel A Jaimes ◽  
Adrián D García-Soto

This study presents an evaluation of floor acceleration demands for the design of rigid and flexible acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components in buildings, calculated using the most recent Mexico City seismic design provisions, released in 2017. This evaluation includes two approaches: (1) a simplified continuous elastic model and (2) using recordings from 10 instrumented buildings located in Mexico City. The study found that peak floor elastic acceleration demands imposed on rigid nonstructural components into buildings situated in Mexico City might reach values of 4.8 and 6.4 times the peak ground acceleration at rock and soft sites, respectively. The peak elastic acceleration demands imposed on flexible nonstructural components in all floors, estimated using floor response spectra, might be four times larger than the maximum acceleration of the floor at the point of support of the component for buildings located in rock and soft soil. Comparison of results from the two approaches with the current seismic design provisions revealed that the peak acceleration demands and floor response spectra computed with the current 2017 Mexico City seismic design provisions are, in general, adequate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 597
Author(s):  
Milan Sokol ◽  
Rudolf Ároch ◽  
Katarína Lamperová ◽  
Martin Marton ◽  
Justo García-Sanz-Calcedo

This paper uses a parametric study to evaluate the significance of the rotational components of Earth’s motion in a seismic design. The parametric study is based on the procedures included in Eurocode 8, Part 6. Although the answer to the question of when the effects of rotational components are important is quite a complex one and requires a more in-depth study, our aim was to try to assess this question in a relatively quick manner and with acceptable accuracy. The first part of the paper is devoted to derivation of a simple formula that can be used for expressing the importance of rotational components in comparison with the classic seismic design without their usage. The quasi-static analysis, assuming inertial forces, is used. A crucial role plays the shape of the fundamental mode of the vibration. Due to simplicity reasons, well-known expression for estimation of the first eigenmode as an exponential function with different power coefficients that vary for different types of buildings is used. The possibility of changing the soil parameters is subsequently included into the formula for estimation of the fundamental frequency of tall buildings. In the next part, the overall seismic analyses of complex FEM models of 3D buildings and chimneys are performed. The results from those analyses are then compared with those from simplified calculations. The importance of the soil characteristics for determination of whether it is necessary to take into account the rotational effects is further discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document