scholarly journals Logistic regression error‐in‐covariate models for longitudinal high‐dimensional covariates

Stat ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung Park ◽  
Seonjoo Lee
2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 287-295
Author(s):  
Zhiming Zhou ◽  
Haihui Huang ◽  
Yong Liang

BACKGROUND: In genome research, it is particularly important to identify molecular biomarkers or signaling pathways related to phenotypes. Logistic regression model is a powerful discrimination method that can offer a clear statistical explanation and obtain the classification probability of classification label information. However, it is unable to fulfill biomarker selection. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to give the model efficient gene selection capability. METHODS: In this paper, we propose a new penalized logsum network-based regularization logistic regression model for gene selection and cancer classification. RESULTS: Experimental results on simulated data sets show that our method is effective in the analysis of high-dimensional data. For a large data set, the proposed method has achieved 89.66% (training) and 90.02% (testing) AUC performances, which are, on average, 5.17% (training) and 4.49% (testing) better than mainstream methods. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method can be considered a promising tool for gene selection and cancer classification of high-dimensional biological data.


MATEMATIKA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49
Author(s):  
T Dwi Ary Widhianingsih ◽  
Heri Kuswanto ◽  
Dedy Dwi Prastyo

Logistic regression is one of the commonly used classification methods. It has some advantages, specifically related to hypothesis testing and its objective function. However, it also has some disadvantages in the case of high-dimensional data, such as multicolinearity, over-fitting, and a high computational burden. Ensemblebased classification methods have been proposed to overcome these problems. The logistic regression ensemble (LORENS) method is expected to improve the classification performance of basic logistic regression. In this paper, we apply it to the case of drug discovery with the objective of obtaining candidate compounds to protect the normal non-cancerous cells, which is considered to be a problem with a data-set of high dimensionality. The experimental results show that it performs well, with an accuracy of 69% and AUC of 0.7306.


2021 ◽  
pp. 550-560
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Alkaitis ◽  
Monica N. Agrawal ◽  
Gregory J. Riely ◽  
Pedram Razavi ◽  
David Sontag

PURPOSE Key oncology end points are not routinely encoded into electronic medical records (EMRs). We assessed whether natural language processing (NLP) can abstract treatment discontinuation rationale from unstructured EMR notes to estimate toxicity incidence and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS We constructed a retrospective cohort of 6,115 patients with early-stage and 701 patients with metastatic breast cancer initiating care at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2008 to 2019. Each cohort was divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and test (15%) subsets. Human abstractors identified the clinical rationale associated with treatment discontinuation events. Concatenated EMR notes were used to train high-dimensional logistic regression and convolutional neural network models. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare toxicity incidence and PFS estimated by our NLP models to estimates generated by manual labeling and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD). RESULTS Our best high-dimensional logistic regression models identified toxicity events in early-stage patients with an area under the curve of the receiver-operator characteristic of 0.857 ± 0.014 (standard deviation) and progression events in metastatic patients with an area under the curve of 0.752 ± 0.027 (standard deviation). NLP-extracted toxicity incidence and PFS curves were not significantly different from manually extracted curves ( P = .95 and P = .67, respectively). By contrast, TTD overestimated toxicity in early-stage patients ( P < .001) and underestimated PFS in metastatic patients ( P < .001). Additionally, we tested an extrapolation approach in which 20% of the metastatic cohort were labeled manually, and NLP algorithms were used to abstract the remaining 80%. This extrapolated outcomes approach resolved PFS differences between receptor subtypes ( P < .001 for hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2− v human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ v triple-negative) that could not be resolved with TTD. CONCLUSION NLP models are capable of abstracting treatment discontinuation rationale with minimal manual labeling.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0217057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Doerken ◽  
Marta Avalos ◽  
Emmanuel Lagarde ◽  
Martin Schumacher

Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konrad Furmańczyk ◽  
Wojciech Rejchel

In this paper, we consider prediction and variable selection in the misspecified binary classification models under the high-dimensional scenario. We focus on two approaches to classification, which are computationally efficient, but lead to model misspecification. The first one is to apply penalized logistic regression to the classification data, which possibly do not follow the logistic model. The second method is even more radical: we just treat class labels of objects as they were numbers and apply penalized linear regression. In this paper, we investigate thoroughly these two approaches and provide conditions, which guarantee that they are successful in prediction and variable selection. Our results hold even if the number of predictors is much larger than the sample size. The paper is completed by the experimental results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document