scholarly journals Performance evaluation for VBR Continuous Media File Server admission control

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 1187-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Makaroff ◽  
G. W. Neufeld ◽  
N. C. Hutchinson
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Admission Control ◽  
Continuous Media ◽  
File Server

Performance Evaluation of Media Synchronization Losses in the Continuous Media Toolkit

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Wijesekera ◽  
S. Parikh ◽  
S. Varadarajan ◽  
J. Srivastava ◽  
A. Nerode
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Continuous Media ◽  
Media Synchronization

scholarly journals A Dockers Storage Performance Evaluation: Impact of Backing File Systems

2021 ◽  
pp. 8-17
Author(s):  
Amer Ramadan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Experimental Design ◽  
File Systems ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
File Server ◽  
Storage Performance ◽  
File Access ◽  
Mail Server ◽  
The Impact ◽  
E Mail

This paper reports on an in-depth examination of the impact of the backing filesystems to Docker performance in the context of Linux container-based virtualization. The experimental design was a 3x3x4 arrangement, i.e., we considered three different numbers of Docker containers, three filesystems (Ext4, XFS and Btrfs), and four application workloads related to Web server I/O activity, e-mail server I/O activity, file server I/O activity and random file access I/O activity, respectively. The experimental results indicate that Ext4 is the most optimal filesystem, among the considered filesystems, for the considered experimental settings. In addition, the XFS filesystem is not suitable for workloads that are dominated by synchronous random write components (e.g., characteristical for mail workload), while the Btrfs filesystem is not suitable for workloads dominated by random write and sequential write components (e.g., file server workload).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document