Conformational Studies of Triazole Based Flexible Molecules: A Comparative Analysis of Crystal Structure and Optimized Structure for DNA Binding Ability

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 3444-3451
Author(s):  
Ranjeet Kumar ◽  
Pratima Yadav ◽  
Shiv Pal ◽  
Krishnan R. Kumar ◽  
Balasubramanian Sridhar ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 357 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Tu ◽  
Xuefeng Wu ◽  
Qin Liu ◽  
Xiaoyong Wang ◽  
Qiang Xu ◽  
...  

RSC Advances ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (35) ◽  
pp. 20837-20851
Author(s):  
Nasima Arshad ◽  
Mamoona Rafiq ◽  
Rabail Ujan ◽  
Aamer Saeed ◽  
Shahid I. Farooqi ◽  
...  

A new compound based upon a benzimidazole thiourea moiety that has unique properties related to elastase inhibition, antioxidant and DNA binding ability has been studied.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Lei ◽  
Yue Feng ◽  
Mengqi Zhou ◽  
Yuan Yang ◽  
Peter Loppnau ◽  
...  

AbstractRBBP1 is a retinoblastoma protein (pRb) binding protein acting as a repressor of gene transcription. RBBP1 is a multidomain protein including a chromo barrel domain, and its chromo barrel domain has been reported to recognize histone H4K20me3 weakly, and this binding is enhanced by the simultaneous binding of DNA. However, the molecular basis of this DNA-mediated histone binding by the chromo barrel domain of RBBP1 is unclear. Here we attempted to co-crystallize the chromo barrel domain of RBBP1 with either a histone H4K20me3 peptide alone or with both a histone H4K20me3 peptide and DNA, but only solved the peptide/DNA unbound crystal structure. Our structural analysis indicates that RBBP1 could interact with histone H4K20me3 similar to other histone binding chromo barrel domains, and the surface charge representation analysis of the chromo barrel domain of RBBP1 suggests that the chromo barrel domain of RBBP1 does not have a typical DNA binding surface, indicating that it might not bind to DNA. Consistently, our ITC assays also showed that DNA does not significantly enhance the histone binding ability of the chromo barrel domain of RBBP1.


1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 7557-7568 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Zuo ◽  
R Baler ◽  
G Dahl ◽  
R Voellmy

Heat stress regulation of human heat shock genes is mediated by human heat shock transcription factor hHSF1, which contains three 4-3 hydrophobic repeats (LZ1 to LZ3). In unstressed human cells (37 degrees C), hHSF1 appears to be in an inactive, monomeric state that may be maintained through intramolecular interactions stabilized by transient interaction with hsp70. Heat stress (39 to 42 degrees C) disrupts these interactions, and hHSF1 homotrimerizes and acquires heat shock element DNA-binding ability. hHSF1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes also assumes a monomeric, non-DNA-binding state and is converted to a trimeric, DNA-binding form upon exposure of the oocytes to heat shock (35 to 37 degrees C in this organism). Because endogenous HSF DNA-binding activity is low and anti-hHSF1 antibody does not recognize Xenopus HSF, we employed this system for mapping regions in hHSF1 that are required for the maintenance of the monomeric state. The results of mutagenesis analyses strongly suggest that the inactive hHSF1 monomer is stabilized by hydrophobic interactions involving all three leucine zippers which may form a triple-stranded coiled coil. Trimerization may enable the DNA-binding function of hHSF1 by facilitating cooperative binding of monomeric DNA-binding domains to the heat shock element motif. This view is supported by observations that several different LexA DNA-binding domain-hHSF1 chimeras bind to a LexA-binding site in a heat-regulated fashion, that single amino acid replacements disrupting the integrity of hydrophobic repeats render these chimeras constitutively trimeric and DNA binding, and that LexA itself binds stably to DNA only as a dimer but not as a monomer in our assays.


1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 1902-1911 ◽  
Author(s):  
K D Sarge ◽  
V Zimarino ◽  
K Holm ◽  
C Wu ◽  
R I Morimoto

2001 ◽  
Vol 361 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy VERRIJDT ◽  
Annemie HAELENS ◽  
Erik SCHOENMAKERS ◽  
Wilfried ROMBAUTS ◽  
Frank CLAESSENS

We performed a comparative analysis of the effect of high-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) on DNA binding by the DNA-binding domains (DBDs) of the androgen, glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptors. The affinity of the DBDs of the different receptors for the tyrosine aminotransferase glucocorticoid response element, a classical high-affinity binding element, was augmented up to 7-fold by HMGB1. We found no major differences in the effects of HMGB1 on DNA binding between the different steroid hormone receptors. In transient transfection assays, however, HMGB1 significantly enhances the activity of the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors but not the androgen or mineralocorticoid receptor. We also investigated the effect of HMGB1 on the binding of the androgen receptor DBD to a subclass of directly repeated response elements that is recognized exclusively by the androgen receptor and not by the glucocorticoid, progesterone or mineralocorticoid receptor. Surprisingly, a deletion of 26 amino acid residues from the C-terminal extension of the androgen receptor DBD does not influence DNA binding but destroys its sensitivity to HMGB1. Deletion of the corresponding fragment in the DBDs of the glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptor destroyed their DNA binding. This 26-residue fragment is therefore essential for the influence of HMGB1 on DNA recognition by all steroid hormone receptors that were tested. However, it is dispensable for DNA binding by the androgen receptor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document