scholarly journals Doubly robust inference for targeted minimum loss-based estimation in randomized trials with missing outcome data

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (24) ◽  
pp. 3807-3819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iván Díaz ◽  
Mark J. van der Laan
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 2125-2131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie L. Bell ◽  
Nicholas J. Horton ◽  
Haryana M. Dhillon ◽  
Victoria J. Bray ◽  
Janette Vardy

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa R. Amer ◽  
Surya Teja Chaturvedula ◽  
Saurabh Joshi ◽  
Joseph Ingrassia

Objective: The optimal antithrombotic regimen in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is not known, leading to significant variations in antithrombotic treatment protocols in randomized trials and clinical practice. In device trials, antithrombotic regimens in patients receiving peripheral vascular interventions have not been clearly reported on. This review summarizes and discusses the most recent evidence on this topic to provide a potential guide to clinical practice. Methods: A search of the literature was done for publications that reported outcomes of major PAD device trials. Reported outcomes and various antithrombotic regimens were studied. Results: Use of antithrombotic therapy varied significantly between various device trials. Reporting of antithrombotic regimens at the time of follow-up is lacking. Conclusion: Outcome data on optimal antithrombotic regimens are presently lacking largely due to the significant heterogeneity and underreporting of antithrombotic regimens at follow-up among prior clinical trials. Standardization and reporting of precise antithrombotic regimens at various points of follow-up in device trials of patients with PAD should be attempted so as to minimize differences in treatment patterns when evaluating new devices.


2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (15) ◽  
pp. 1153-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf H.H. Groenwold ◽  
Karel G.M. Moons ◽  
Jan P. Vandenbroucke

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel David Lendle ◽  
Bruce Fireman ◽  
Mark J. van der Laan

AbstractAdjusting for a balancing score is sufficient for bias reduction when estimating causal effects including the average treatment effect and effect among the treated. Estimators that adjust for the propensity score in a nonparametric way, such as matching on an estimate of the propensity score, can be consistent when the estimated propensity score is not consistent for the true propensity score but converges to some other balancing score. We call this property the balancing score property, and discuss a class of estimators that have this property. We introduce a targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) for a treatment-specific mean with the balancing score property that is additionally locally efficient and doubly robust. We investigate the new estimator’s performance relative to other estimators, including another TMLE, a propensity score matching estimator, an inverse probability of treatment weighted estimator, and a regression-based estimator in simulation studies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 115 (532) ◽  
pp. 2011-2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilin Chen ◽  
Pengfei Li ◽  
Changbao Wu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document