Commentary on ‘How the debate about comparative effectiveness research (CER) should impact the future of clinical trials’ by Michael S. Lauer

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (25) ◽  
pp. 3054-3056
Author(s):  
Jonas H. Ellenberg
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness Research ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Effectiveness Research ◽  
The Future

scholarly journals CYberinfrastructure for COmparative effectiveness REsearch (CYCORE): improving data from cancer clinical trials

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Patrick ◽  
Laura Wolszon ◽  
Karen M Basen-Engquist ◽  
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried ◽  
Alex V Prokhorov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness Research ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Effectiveness Research ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials

Comparative effectiveness research: policy and politics

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. E6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edie E. Zusman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness Research ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Research Policy ◽  
Effectiveness Research ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Future Health ◽  
The Future ◽  
Key Aspects

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is the basis for some of the fiercest rhetoric of the current political era. While it is a relatively old and previously academic pursuit, CER may well become the foundation upon which the future of health care in the US is based. The actual impact of CER on—and uptake among—doctors, patients, hospitals, and health insurers, however, remains to be seen. Political considerations and compromises have led to the removal of key aspects of CER implementation from policy legislation to prevent alienating stakeholders critical to the success of health care reform. Health care providers, including specialists such as neurosurgeons, will need to understand both the policies and political implications of CER as its practices becomes an indelible part of the future health care landscape.

scholarly journals Evidence Gaps in Advanced Cancer Care: Community-Based Clinicians' Perspectives and Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (3S) ◽  
pp. 28s-33s ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Lowry ◽  
Elizabeth T. Loggers ◽  
Erin J.A. Bowles ◽  
Edward H. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness Research ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Effectiveness Research ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Pragmatic Clinical Trials

Comparative effectiveness research and pragmatic clinical trials are valued methods to address the limitations of traditional randomized trials, answer questions of cost-effectiveness or noninferiority, and inform data-driven dialogue and decision making by stakeholders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document