A two-stage trial design for testing treatment, self-selection and treatment preference effects

1989 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerta Rücker
2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (25) ◽  
pp. 3653-3683
Author(s):  
Yu Shi ◽  
Briana Cameron ◽  
Xian Gu ◽  
Michael Kane ◽  
Peter Peduzzi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 2168-2184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Briana Cameron ◽  
Denise A Esserman

The two-stage (or doubly) randomized preference trial design is an important tool for researchers seeking to disentangle the role of patient treatment preference on treatment response through estimation of selection and preference effects. Up until now, these designs have been limited by their assumption of equal preference rates and effect sizes across the entire study population. We propose a stratified two-stage randomized trial design that addresses this limitation. We begin by deriving stratified test statistics for the treatment, preference, and selection effects. Next, we develop a sample size formula for the number of patients required to detect each effect. The properties of the model and the efficiency of the design are established using a series of simulation studies. We demonstrate the applicability of the design using a study of Hepatitis C treatment modality, specialty clinic versus mobile medical clinic. In this example, a stratified preference design (stratified by alcohol/drug use) may more closely capture the true distribution of patient preferences and allow for a more efficient design than a design which ignores these differences (unstratified version).


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 700-713
Author(s):  
Michelle DeVeaux ◽  
Michael Kane ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Daniel Zelterman

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (19) ◽  
pp. 2055-2067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaohong Dong ◽  
Weichung Joe Shih ◽  
Dirk Moore ◽  
Hui Quan ◽  
Stephen Marcella

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1142-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Berlin ◽  
J A Stewart ◽  
B Storer ◽  
K D Tutsch ◽  
R Z Arzoomanian ◽  
...  

PURPOSE A novel phase I trial design was used to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics for penclomedine when administered as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 1 hour daily for 5 days, repeated every 28 days. This study also tests the feasibility of a novel two-stage design for phase I trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-eight patients with advanced malignancy who met standard eligibility criteria were treated with i.v. penclomedine. The initial daily dose was 50 mg/m2. Dose escalations were planned using a modified Fibonacci sequence. One patient was enrolled on each dose level during the first stage of this trial. In the second stage, patients were enrolled in cohorts of three, proceeding in an up-and-down manner based on toxicities observed. MTD was determined by logistic regression analysis. Pharmacokinetic assessment was performed during the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) observed during this trial were principally neurologic and were self-limited. Although hematologic toxicity was rare, the few patients with significant hematologic changes experienced late nadirs with prolonged time to recovery. The MTD was estimated as 381 mg/m2 (80% CI, 343 to 415 mg/m2). Although there was a long elimination half-life, accumulation of penclomedine over the 5 days of administration was negligible. CONCLUSION The novel trial design used in this study was safe and appeared effective in limiting the numbers of patients treated at lower-dose levels. Reversible neurotoxicity was dose-limiting. Although the estimated MTD was 381 mg/m2, any dose within the CI would be reasonable for phase II study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document