Correction. O. C. Ukoumunne, A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trialsStatistics in Medicine 2002;21: 3757–3774.

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (18) ◽  
pp. 2935-2935
Author(s):  
Obioha C. Ukoumunne
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Interval Methods ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Speech perception, real-ear measurements and self-perceived hearing impairment after remote and face-to-face programming of hearing aids: A randomized single-blind agreement study

2019 ◽  
pp. 1357633X1988354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Venail ◽  
Marie C Picot ◽  
Gregory Marin ◽  
Sylvain Falinower ◽  
Jacques Samson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Speech Understanding ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Single Blind

Introduction Current literature does not provide strong evidence that remote programming of hearing aids is effective, despite its increasing use by audiologists. We tested speech perception outcomes, real-ear insertion gain, and changes in self-perceived hearing impairment after face-to-face and remote programming of hearing aids in a randomized multicentre, single-blind crossover study. Methods Adult experienced hearing aid users were enrolled during routine follow-up visits to audiology clinics. Hearing aids were programmed both face to face and remotely, then participants randomly received either the face-to-face or remote settings in a blinded manner and were evaluated 5 weeks later. Participants then received the other settings and were evaluated 5 weeks later. Results Data from 52 out of 60 participants were analysed. We found excellent concordance in performance of hearing aids programmed face to face and remotely for speech understanding in quiet (phonetically balanced kindergarten test – intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.87–0.95)), and good concordance in performance for speech understanding in noise (phonetically balanced kindergarten +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio – intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.55–0.82)). Face-to-face and remote programming took 10 minutes (±2.9) and 10 minutes (±2.8), respectively. Real-ear insertion gains were highly correlated for input sound at 50, 65 and 80 dB sound pressure levels. The programming type did not affect the abbreviated profile of hearing aid questionnaire scores. Conclusions In experienced hearing aid users, face-to-face and remote programming of hearing aids give similar results in terms of speech perception, with no increase in the time spent on patients’ care and no difference in self-reported hearing benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02589561

scholarly journals Intra- and inter-rater reliability in a comparative study of cross-sectional and spiral computed tomography pelvimetry methods

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 205846011985518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Phexell ◽  
Anna Åkesson ◽  
Marcus Söderberg ◽  
Anetta Bolejko
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Measurement Reliability ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Short Spiral

Background Different low-dose computed tomography (CT) pelvimetry methods can be used to evaluate the size of birth canal before delivery. CT pelvimetry might generate an acceptable low fetal radiation dose but its measurement accuracy is unknown. Purpose To investigate intra- and inter-rater measurement reliability of cross-sectional and two spiral CT pelvimetry methods: standard spiral and short spiral. Material and Methods Ten individuals (age ≥60 years, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) having a CT scan of the abdomen also had CT pelvimetry scans. Three radiologists made independent measurements of each pelvimetry method on two occasions and also in consensus for a reference pelvimetry computed from the standard-dose CT scan of the abdomen. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient. Results Measurements in the short spiral pelvimetry demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.93, and good to excellent 95% confidence interval 0.87–0.99. Corresponding results of the standard spiral and cross-sectional pelvimetry showed good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.85 and ≥0.76, and 95% confidence interval was least good and moderate 0.73–0.98 and 0.59–0.97, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient between reference pelvimetry and other CT methods showed analogous results. Conclusion The short spiral pelvimetry demonstrated high and best reliability in comparison to other methods. Standard spiral method showed also good measurement reliability but the short spiral pelvimetry generates lower fetal radiation dose. This method might be suitable for measurements at narrow pelvis. Patient acceptance and attitude to CT pelvimetry should be investigated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document