P‐9: Understanding Diffusion Behaviors of Light Elements in OLEDs

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 1088-1090
Author(s):  
Jae Bum HAN ◽  
Young-Gil Park ◽  
Soo Im Jeong ◽  
Nari Ahn
Author(s):  
T. Oikawa ◽  
M. Inoue ◽  
T. Honda ◽  
Y. Kokubo

EELS allows us to make analysis of light elements such as hydrogen to heavy elements of microareas on the specimen. In energy loss spectra, however, elemental signals ride on a high background; therefore, the signal/background (S/B) ratio is very low in EELS. A technique which collects the center beam axial-symmetrically in the scattering angle is generally used to obtain high total intensity. However, the technique collects high background intensity together with elemental signals; therefore, the technique does not improve the S/B ratio. This report presents the experimental results of the S/B ratio measured as a function of the scattering angle and shows the possibility of the S/B ratio being improved in the high scattering angle range.Energy loss spectra have been measured using a JEM-200CX TEM with an energy analyzer ASEA3 at 200 kV.Fig.l shows a typical K-shell electron excitation edge riding on background in an energy loss spectrum.


Author(s):  
G.F. Bastin ◽  
H.J.M. Heijligers

Among the ultra-light elements B, C, N, and O nitrogen is the most difficult element to deal with in the electron probe microanalyzer. This is mainly caused by the severe absorption that N-Kα radiation suffers in carbon which is abundantly present in the detection system (lead-stearate crystal, carbonaceous counter window). As a result the peak-to-background ratios for N-Kα measured with a conventional lead-stearate crystal can attain values well below unity in many binary nitrides . An additional complication can be caused by the presence of interfering higher-order reflections from the metal partner in the nitride specimen; notorious examples are elements such as Zr and Nb. In nitrides containing these elements is is virtually impossible to carry out an accurate background subtraction which becomes increasingly important with lower and lower peak-to-background ratios. The use of a synthetic multilayer crystal such as W/Si (2d-spacing 59.8 Å) can bring significant improvements in terms of both higher peak count rates as well as a strong suppression of higher-order reflections.


1991 ◽  
Vol 161 (5) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu.B. Khariton ◽  
Ya.B. Zeldovich ◽  
I.I. Gurevich ◽  
I.Ya. Pomeranchuk

1947 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Schlesinger ◽  
G. W. Schaeffer
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 499 (2) ◽  
pp. 735-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lemoine ◽  
Elisabeth Vangioni‐Flam ◽  
Michel Casse

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 587
Author(s):  
Lijuan Ni ◽  
Renxing Wang ◽  
Qingya Liu ◽  
Junfei Wu ◽  
Yue Pan ◽  
...  

To better understand the mass transfer behaviors in CaC2 production from CaO and coke, this paper studies the diffusion behaviors of CaO and graphite, with or without ash, at 1500 and 1700 °C. CaO and graphite are pressed into tablets and heated alone or in close contact. Physical and chemical changes in these tablets are analyzed by XRD and SEM+EDX. In some experiments, thin Mo wires are placed between the closely contacted CaO and graphite tablets to identify the diffusion direction. It is found that the diffusion between CaO and low-ash graphite is very limited. SiO2 in a high-ash graphite diffuses into CaO tablet and reacts with CaO to form Ca2SiO4, which then diffuses into the graphite tablet easily and leads to CaC2 formation at 1700 °C.


Minerals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Valérie Laperche ◽  
Bruno Lemière

Portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy is now widely used in almost any field of geoscience. Handheld XRF analysers are easy to use, and results are available in almost real time anywhere. However, the results do not always match laboratory analyses, and this may deter users. Rather than analytical issues, the bias often results from sample preparation differences. Instrument setup and analysis conditions need to be fully understood to avoid reporting erroneous results. The technique’s limitations must be kept in mind. We describe a number of issues and potential pitfalls observed from our experience and described in the literature. This includes the analytical mode and parameters; protective films; sample geometry and density, especially for light elements; analytical interferences between elements; physical effects of the matrix and sample condition, and more. Nevertheless, portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (pXRF) results gathered with sufficient care by experienced users are both precise and reliable, if not fully accurate, and they can constitute robust data sets. Rather than being a substitute for laboratory analyses, pXRF measurements are a valuable complement to those. pXRF improves the quality and relevance of laboratory data sets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document