scholarly journals Critical science agency and power hierarchies: Restructuring power within groups to address injustice beyond them

2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 500-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Schenkel ◽  
Angela Calabrese Barton
2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreyashi Jhumki Basu ◽  
Angela Calabrese Barton ◽  
Neil Clairmont ◽  
Donya Locke

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Schenkel ◽  
Angela Calabrese Barton ◽  
Edna Tan ◽  
Christina Restrepo Nazar ◽  
Marcos D. González D. Flores

2020 ◽  
pp. 095935432097870
Author(s):  
Peiwei Li

Critical epistemological reflection facilitates disciplinary self-reflection, and yet the limitation of this practice needs to examined. This article explores the possibility of a praxis-oriented philosophical foundation for psychology through investigating the limits to knowledge. Integrating insights from critical communicative pragmatist perspectives and Zen Buddhism, this paper outlines what constitutes limits to knowledge and contests the boundary of epistemology, in relation to psychology as a natural science, social science, and critical science. Building upon this deconstruction/reconstruction, Zen Buddhist practice is drawn upon to further illuminate the potential to center psychology through the praxis of knowing as being, which is nontotalizing and always open to uncertainty and fallibility. My key argument is that any notion of epistemology is inadequate when divorced from its intra-connection to being and practice that have inherent ethical and moral relevance. This necessitates deferring philosophizing to a constant and endless practice that upholds an ethics of solidarity.


Thesis Eleven ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 072551362110643
Author(s):  
Christopher Houston

Pierre Bourdieu famously dismissed phenomenology as offering anything useful to a critical science of society – even as he drew heavily upon its themes in his own work. This paper makes a case for why Bourdieu’s judgement should not be the last word on phenomenology. To do so it first reanimates phenomenology’s evocative language and concepts to illustrate their continuing centrality to social scientists’ ambitions to apprehend human engagement with the world. Part II shows how two crucial insights of phenomenology, its discovery of both the natural attitude and of the phenomenological epoche, allow an account of perception properly responsive to its intertwined personal and collective aspects. Contra Bourdieu, the paper’s third section asserts that phenomenology’s substantive socio-cultural analysis simultaneously entails methodological consequences for the social scientist, reversing their suspension of disbelief vis-à-vis the life-worlds of interlocutors and inaugurating the suspension of belief vis-à-vis their own natural attitudes.


Author(s):  
Edna Tan ◽  
Angela Calabrese Barton ◽  
Erin E. Turner ◽  
Maura Varley Gutiérrez

1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn D. Rettig ◽  
Vicky Chiu-wan Tam ◽  
Lois Yellowthunder

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document