scholarly journals Triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention/stenting

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Kozieł ◽  
Tatjana S. Potpara ◽  
Gregory Y. H. Lip
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Where Are We Now?

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 884-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan G. D’Angelo ◽  
Thaddeus McGiness ◽  
Laura H. Waite
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Objective: To synthesize the literature and provide guidance to practitioners regarding double therapy (DT) and triple therapy (TT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data Sources: PubMed and MEDLINE (January 2000 to February 2018) were searched using the following terms: atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary intervention, anticoagulation, dual-antiplatelet therapy, clopidogrel, aspirin, ticagrelor, prasugrel, and triple therapy. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The results included randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials and meta-analyses. Each study was reported based on study design, population, intervention, comparator, and key cardiovascular (CV) and bleeding outcomes. Data Synthesis: A total of 15 studies were included in the review. The majority of studies evaluating DT and TT utilized clopidogrel and warfarin as components of the regimen, although there are emerging data with newer agents. Evidence purporting DT regimens to be equally effective in preventing CV events and improved safety profiles compared with TT regimens included populations with relatively low risk for recurrent CV events, and many of these studies were observational in nature. Overall, current evidence as well as American and European guidelines support the use of TT in patients with AF who require PCI for the least possible amount of time, depending on patient-specific factors involving bleeding and thrombosis. Conclusions: In the majority of patients with AF who require PCI, TT should be used for the shortest period of time possible. DT regimens may be used in patients requiring PCI who have low risk for thrombosis and/or high bleeding risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document