Monitored natural attenuation forum: A panel discussion on the use of integrated mass flux and MNA inconsistencies within federal and state agencies

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Vangelas ◽  
Frank H. Chappelle ◽  
Jim Cummings ◽  
Paul C. Johnson ◽  
Kenneth A. Lovelace Jr. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Flux ◽  
Natural Attenuation ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
State Agencies ◽  
Monitored Natural Attenuation

Monitored natural attenuation forum: A panel discussion

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank H. Chapelle ◽  
David E. Ellis ◽  
Evan K. Nyer ◽  
Kenneth A. Lovelace ◽  
Bruce E. Rittmann
Keyword(s):  
Natural Attenuation ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Monitored Natural Attenuation

Monitored natural attenuation forum: A panel discussion

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 111-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Lee ◽  
Ross Miller ◽  
Theresa Evanson ◽  
Charles J. Newell ◽  
John T. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Natural Attenuation ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Monitored Natural Attenuation

scholarly journals Monitored natural attenuation forum: A panel discussion

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bob Norris ◽  
Lenny Siegel ◽  
Stephen Lester ◽  
Hal White
Keyword(s):  
Natural Attenuation ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Monitored Natural Attenuation

Monitored natural attenuation forum: A panel discussion

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Borden ◽  
Guy W. Sewell ◽  
Hanadi S. Rifai
Keyword(s):  
Natural Attenuation ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Monitored Natural Attenuation

Monitored natural attenuation — can mass flux through monitoring fences document mass loss in groundwater plumes?

2020 ◽  
pp. 311-312
Author(s):  
J.F. Barker ◽  
C. Beland-Pelletier ◽  
F. Blaine ◽  
J.F. Devlin ◽  
M.W.G. King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Natural Attenuation ◽  
Monitored Natural Attenuation

Monitored Natural Attenuation Forum: A panel discussion

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce E. Rittmann ◽  
Fran Kremer ◽  
Barbara Bekins
Keyword(s):  
Natural Attenuation ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Monitored Natural Attenuation

Monitored natural attenuation forum: A panel discussion

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 125-129
Author(s):  
John A. Simon ◽  
Bob Norris ◽  
Mark Ferrey
Keyword(s):  
Natural Attenuation ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Monitored Natural Attenuation

Assessment Monitored Natural Attenuation Rate in a Petroleum Contaminated Shallow Aquifer

2013 ◽  
Vol 753-755 ◽  
pp. 2223-2226
Author(s):  
Hang Lv ◽  
Guang Yu Lin ◽  
Xiao Si Su ◽  
Ming Yao Liu ◽  
Nai Wang
Keyword(s):  
Mass Flux ◽  
Natural Attenuation ◽  
Petroleum Hydrocarbons ◽  
Environmental Problem ◽  
Shallow Aquifer ◽  
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ◽  
Contaminated Site ◽  
Monitoring Period ◽  
Attenuation Rate ◽  
Monitored Natural Attenuation

Contamination of groundwater and soil by petroleum hydrocarbons is a widespread environmental problem. In order to quantify the potential of natural attenuation of groundwater at a petroleum contaminated site. The total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) concentrations of 11 rounds were collected during the 1 year monitoring period, and the mass flux technique is used to calculate the attenuation rates. The calculated attenuation rates are between 0.0046-0.0064d-1, which indicating the time to achieve the remediation goal for the contamination site is possible within 3 years by natural attenuation alone.

Monitored natural attenuation forum: A panel discussion

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Cooley ◽  
Mark Ferrey ◽  
Mark Harkness ◽  
R. Ryan Dupont ◽  
Hans Stroo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Attenuation ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Monitored Natural Attenuation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document