scholarly journals Robotic rectal resection preserves anorectal function: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia K. Grass ◽  
Chien‐Chih Chen ◽  
Nathaniel Melling ◽  
Bharathi Lingala ◽  
Marius Kemper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Anorectal Function ◽  
Robotic Rectal Resection

Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted colectomy and rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Lorenzon ◽  
Fabiano Bini ◽  
Genoveffa Balducci ◽  
Mario Ferri ◽  
Pier Federico Salvi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Robotic Assisted

RISK FACTOR ANALYSIS OF TYPE COLORECTAL OPERATION AND INTRAABDOMEN CONTAMINATION ON EVENT POST OPERATIVE ADHESION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND METAANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
pp. 75-79
Author(s):  
Afra Amira ◽  
Adi Muradi Muhar ◽  
Asrul Asrul
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Total Colectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Postoperative Adhesions ◽  
Hartmann Procedure ◽  
Segmental Colectomy

BACKGROUND: Colorectal surgery is the highest incidence of adhesion-related problems. The type of surgery might be total coletomy, right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, segmental colectomy, Hartmann procedure, and colostomy. Surgical procedures performed on the colon could be contaminated. The most common contamination is faecal contamination. Various causes of peritoneal irritation result in localized brin production, which results in adhesion to the surfaces in contact. PURPOSE: This study focused on the type of colorectal surgery and intra-abdominal contamination on the incidence of postoperative adhesions. METHOD: Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched for published journal on types of colorectal surgery and contamination with adhesion events published from 2010-2020 using electronic database : Pubmed, Science Direct and Cochrane. RESULT: Ten journals (8 cohort and 2 case control) were included in the meta-analysis. In the risk factors for colorectal surgery: APR surgery, total colectomy and rectal resection had a signicant risk of postoperative adhesions with a pooled odds ratio of 1.74 (95% CI 1 respectively). ,10-2,78); 2.89 (95% CI 2.44-3.41) and 9.91 (95% CI 8.66-11.35). Intra-abdominal contamination also had a risk of adhesions with a pooled odds ratio of 863.47 (95% CI 177.73-4194.13). CONCLUSION: Types of colorectal surgery : APR, total colectomy, and rectal resection and intra-abdominal contamination had a risk of postoperative adhesions.

scholarly journals Comparison of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy and Radical Hysterectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1841-1850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuowei Xue ◽  
Xiaolu Zhu ◽  
Yincheng Teng
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Anorectal Function ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Function Recovery

Background/Aims: Radical hysterectomy (RH) for the treatment of cervical cancer frequently caused pelvic organ dysfunctions. This study aimed to compare the results of pelvic organ function and recurrence rate after Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) and RH treatment through systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database were searched from inception to 25 February 2015. Studies of cervical cancer which reported radical hysterectomy or nerve sparing radical hysterectomy were included. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the guidelines of Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration). Results: A total of 20 studies were finally included. Meta-analysis demonstrated that NSRH was associated with less bladder and anorectal dysfunction than RH. The time to bladder and anorectal function recovery after NSRH was shorter than RH. Patients undergoing NSRH also scored higher than patients undergoing RH at Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). On the other hand, the local recurrence and overall recurrence rate were similar between NSRH and RH. Conclusion: NSRH may be an effective technique for lowering pelvic organ dysfunction and improving the function recovery without increasing the recurrence rate of cervical cancer.

scholarly journals Treatment options to improve anorectal function following rectal resection: a systematic review

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e67-e78 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Maris ◽  
A. M. Devreese ◽  
A. D’Hoore ◽  
F. Penninckx ◽  
F. Staes
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Anorectal Function

The effects of low-ratio n-6/n-3 PUFA on biomarkers of inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Wei ◽  
Yan Meng ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Liyong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Fatty Acid ◽  
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Inflammation Markers ◽  
Pufa Supplementation ◽  
Long Chain

The purpose of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if low-ratio n-6/n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation affects serum inflammation markers based on current studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document