scholarly journals Sensitivity of the atmospheric energy budget to two‐moment representation of cloud microphysics in idealized simulations of convective radiative quasi‐equilibrium

2014 ◽  
Vol 141 (686) ◽  
pp. 114-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuya Baba
2001 ◽  
Vol 77 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 167-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Haimberger ◽  
B. Ahrens ◽  
F. Hamelbeck ◽  
M. Hantel

Author(s):  
David F. Porter ◽  
John J. Cassano ◽  
Mark C. Serreze ◽  
David N. Kindig

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard I. Cullather ◽  
Michael G. Bosilovich

Abstract Components of the atmospheric energy budget from the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) are evaluated in polar regions for the period 1979–2005 and compared with previous estimates, in situ observations, and contemporary reanalyses. Closure of the budget is reflected by the analysis increments term, which indicates an energy surplus of 11 W m−2 over the North Polar cap (70°–90°N) and 22 W m−2 over the South Polar cap (70°–90°S). Total atmospheric energy convergence from MERRA compares favorably with previous studies for northern high latitudes but exceeds the available previous estimate for the South Polar cap by 46%. Discrepancies with the Southern Hemisphere energy transport are largest in autumn and may be related to differences in topography with earlier reanalyses. For the Arctic, differences between MERRA and other sources in top of atmosphere (TOA) and surface radiative fluxes are largest in May. These differences are concurrent with the largest discrepancies between MERRA parameterized and observed surface albedo. For May, in situ observations of the upwelling shortwave flux in the Arctic are 80 W m−2 larger than MERRA, while the MERRA downwelling longwave flux is underestimated by 12 W m−2 throughout the year. Over grounded ice sheets, the annual mean net surface energy flux in MERRA is erroneously nonzero. Contemporary reanalyses from the Climate Forecast Center (CFSR) and the Interim Re-Analyses of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ERA-I) are found to have better surface parameterizations; however, these reanalyses also disagree with observed surface and TOA energy fluxes. Discrepancies among available reanalyses underscore the challenge of reproducing credible estimates of the atmospheric energy budget in polar regions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (20) ◽  
pp. 7933-7942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Previdi ◽  
Karen L. Smith ◽  
Lorenzo M. Polvani

Abstract The authors evaluate 23 coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models from phase 5 of CMIP (CMIP5) in terms of their ability to simulate the observed climatological mean energy budget of the Antarctic atmosphere. While the models are shown to capture the gross features of the energy budget well [e.g., the observed two-way balance between the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) net radiation and horizontal convergence of atmospheric energy transport], the simulated TOA absorbed shortwave (SW) radiation is too large during austral summer. In the multimodel mean, this excessive absorption reaches approximately 10 W m−2, with even larger biases (up to 25–30 W m−2) in individual models. Previous studies have identified similar climate model biases in the TOA net SW radiation at Southern Hemisphere midlatitudes and have attributed these biases to errors in the simulated cloud cover. Over the Antarctic, though, model cloud errors are of secondary importance, and biases in the simulated TOA net SW flux are instead driven mainly by biases in the clear-sky SW reflection. The latter are likely related in part to the models’ underestimation of the observed annual minimum in Antarctic sea ice extent, thus underscoring the importance of sea ice in the Antarctic energy budget. Finally, substantial differences in the climatological surface energy fluxes between existing observational datasets preclude any meaningful assessment of model skill in simulating these fluxes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1897-1912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech W. Grabowski ◽  
Hugh Morrison

Abstract This paper extends the previous cloud-resolving modeling study concerning the impact of cloud microphysics on convective–radiative quasi equilibrium (CRQE) over a surface with fixed characteristics and prescribed solar input, both mimicking the mean conditions on earth. The current study applies sophisticated double-moment warm-rain and ice microphysics schemes, which allow for a significantly more realistic representation of the impact of aerosols on precipitation processes and on the coupling between clouds and radiative transfer. Two contrasting cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) characteristics are assumed, representing pristine and polluted conditions, as well as contrasting representations of the effects of entrainment and mixing on the mean cloud droplet size. In addition, four sets of sensitivity simulations are also performed with changes that provide a reference for the main simulation set. As in the previous study, the CRQE mimics the estimates of globally and annually averaged water and energy fluxes across the earth’s atmosphere. There are some differences from the previous study, however, consistent with the slightly lower water vapor content in the troposphere and significantly reduced lower-tropospheric cloud fraction in current simulations. There is also a significant reduction of the difference between the pristine and polluted cases, from ∼20 to ∼4 W m−2 at the surface from ∼20 to ∼9 W m−2 at the top of the atmosphere (TOA). The difference between the homogeneous and extremely inhomogeneous mixing scenarios, ∼20 W m−2 in the previous study, is reduced to a mere 2 (1) W m−2 at the surface (TOA). An unexpected difference between the previous and current simulations is the lower Bowen ratio of the surface heat flux, the partitioning of the total flux into sensible and latent components. It is shown that most of the change comes from the difference in the representation of rain evaporation in the subcloud layer in the single- and double-moment microphysics schemes. The difference affects the mean air temperature and humidity near the surface, and thus the Bowen ratio. The differences between the various simulations are discussed, contrasting the process-level approach with the impact of cloud microphysics on the quasi-equilibrium state with a more appropriate system dynamics approach. The key distinction is that the latter includes the interactions among all the processes in the modeled system.


1999 ◽  
Vol 104 (D8) ◽  
pp. 9655-9661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rucong Yu ◽  
Minghua Zhang ◽  
Robert D. Cess

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Dagan ◽  
Philip Stier ◽  
Matthew Christensen ◽  
Guido Cioni ◽  
Daniel Klocke ◽  
...  

Abstract. The atmospheric energy budget is analysed in numerical simulations of tropical cloud systems. This is done in order to better understand the physical processes behind aerosol effects on the atmospheric energy budget. The simulations include both shallow convective clouds and deep convective tropical clouds over the Atlantic Ocean. Two different sets of simulations, at different dates (10–12/8/2016 and 16–18/8/2016), are being simulated with different dominant cloud modes (shallow or deep). For each case, the cloud droplet number concentrations (CDNC) is varied as a proxy for changes in aerosol concentrations. It is shown that the total column atmospheric radiative cooling is substantially reduced with CDNC in the deep-cloud dominated case (by ~ 10.0 W/m2), while a much smaller reduction (~ 1.6 W/m2) is shown in the shallow-cloud dominated case. This trend is caused by an increase in the ice and water vapor content at the upper troposphere that leads to a reduced outgoing longwave radiation. A decrease in sensible heat flux (driven by increase in the near surface air temperature) reduces the warming by ~ 1.4 W/m2 in both cases. It is also shown that the cloud fraction response behaves in opposite ways to an increase in CDNC, showing an increase in the deep-cloud dominated case and a decrease in the shallow-cloud dominated case. This demonstrates that under different environmental conditions the response to aerosol perturbation could be different.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document