Comments on“Hazard analysis and safety consideration in refrigerated ammonia storage tanks” by Falah Al-Abdulally, Saad Al-Shuwaib and B. L. Gupta

1987 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. O6-O8
Author(s):  
Jan M. Blanken
Keyword(s):  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Storage Tanks ◽  
Ammonia Storage ◽  
Safety Consideration

Hazard analysis and safety considerations in refrigerated ammonia storage tanks

1987 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Falah Al-Abdulally ◽  
Saad Al-Shuwaib ◽  
B. L. Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Storage Tanks ◽  
Ammonia Storage ◽  
Safety Considerations

Refrigerated ammonia storage tanks

1982 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay M. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Storage Tanks ◽  
Ammonia Storage

Measures for reducing SCC in anhydrous ammonia storage tanks

1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Nyborg ◽  
Liv Lunde
Keyword(s):  
Storage Tanks ◽  
Anhydrous Ammonia ◽  
Ammonia Storage

Successful inspection of two large ammonia storage tanks

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf Abdulla ◽  
Yoga Narasimha
Keyword(s):  
Storage Tanks ◽  
Ammonia Storage

Food Safety Security: A new Concept for Enhancing Food Safety Measures

2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkatesh Iyengar ◽  
Ibrahim Elmadfa
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Warning System ◽  
Shared Responsibility ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Strategic Action ◽  
Surveillance Network ◽  
Measurement Systems ◽  
Critical Control Points ◽  
The Impact

The food safety security (FSS) concept is perceived as an early warning system for minimizing food safety (FS) breaches, and it functions in conjunction with existing FS measures. Essentially, the function of FS and FSS measures can be visualized in two parts: (i) the FS preventive measures as actions taken at the stem level, and (ii) the FSS interventions as actions taken at the root level, to enhance the impact of the implemented safety steps. In practice, along with FS, FSS also draws its support from (i) legislative directives and regulatory measures for enforcing verifiable, timely, and effective compliance; (ii) measurement systems in place for sustained quality assurance; and (iii) shared responsibility to ensure cohesion among all the stakeholders namely, policy makers, regulators, food producers, processors and distributors, and consumers. However, the functional framework of FSS differs from that of FS by way of: (i) retooling the vulnerable segments of the preventive features of existing FS measures; (ii) fine-tuning response systems to efficiently preempt the FS breaches; (iii) building a long-term nutrient and toxicant surveillance network based on validated measurement systems functioning in real time; (iv) focusing on crisp, clear, and correct communication that resonates among all the stakeholders; and (v) developing inter-disciplinary human resources to meet ever-increasing FS challenges. Important determinants of FSS include: (i) strengthening international dialogue for refining regulatory reforms and addressing emerging risks; (ii) developing innovative and strategic action points for intervention {in addition to Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) procedures]; and (iii) introducing additional science-based tools such as metrology-based measurement systems.

PEMETAAN DAERAH RENTAN GEMPA BUMI SEBAGAI DASAR PERENCANAAN TATA RUANG DAN WILAYAH DI PROVINSI SULAWESI BARAT

KURVATEK ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Marinda noor Eva
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis ◽  
Seismic Hazard Analysis ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard

Penelitian mengenai daerah rawan gempa bumi ini menggunakan Metode Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) di Provinsi Sulawesi Barat, dengan tujuan untuk memetakan tingkat kerawanan bahaya gempa bumi di Kabupaten Mamasa. Penelitian ini menggunakan data kejadian gempa bumi di Pulau Sulawesi dan sekitarnya dari tahun 1900 – 2015. Hasil pengolahan PSHA menggunakan Software Ez-Frisk 7.52 yang menghasilkan nilai hazard di batuan dasar pada kondisi PGA (T = 0,0 sekon), dengan periode ulang 500 tahun dan 2500 tahun berkisar antara (149,54 – 439,45) gal dan (287,18 – 762,81) gal. Nilai hazard di batuan dasar dengan kondisi spektra T = 0,2 sekon untuk periode ulang 500 tahun dan 2500 tahun adalah (307,04 – 1010,90) gal dan (569,48 – 1849,78) gal. Nilai hazard di batuan dasar dengan kondisi spektra T = 1,0 sekon untuk periode ulang 500 tahun dan 2500 tahun diperoleh nilai (118,01 – 265,75) gal dan (223,74 – 510,92) gal. Berdasarkan analisis PSHA, nilai PGA di Provinsi Sulawesi Barat dominan dipengaruhi oleh sumber gempa sesar.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document