Combined external beam radiotherapy and Pd-103 brachytherapy boost improves biochemical failure free survival in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: Results of a matched pair analysis

The Prostate ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anu M. Singh ◽  
Gregory Gagnon ◽  
Brian Collins ◽  
Azam Niroomand-Rad ◽  
Donald McRae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Biochemical Failure ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Matched Pair Analysis ◽  
Brachytherapy Boost ◽  
Pair Analysis

scholarly journals Addition of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy or Brachytherapy Boost to External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (26) ◽  
pp. 3024-3031 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Jackson ◽  
Holly E. Hartman ◽  
Robert T. Dess ◽  
Sam R. Birer ◽  
Payal D. Soni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Brachytherapy Boost ◽  
Meta Analyses

PURPOSE In men with localized prostate cancer, the addition of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) or a brachytherapy boost (BT) to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) have been shown to improve various oncologic end points. Practice patterns indicate that those who receive BT are significantly less likely to receive ADT, and thus we sought to perform a network meta-analysis to compare the predicted outcomes of a randomized trial of EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT plus BT. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review identified published randomized trials comparing EBRT with or without ADT, or EBRT (with or without ADT) with or without BT, that reported on overall survival (OS). Standard fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed for each comparison, and a meta-regression was conducted to adjust for use and duration of ADT. Network meta-analyses were performed to compare EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT plus BT. Bayesian analyses were also performed, and a rank was assigned to each treatment after Markov Chain Monte Carlo analyses to create a surface under the cumulative ranking curve. RESULTS Six trials compared EBRT with or without ADT (n = 4,663), and 3 compared EBRT with or without BT (n = 718). The addition of ADT to EBRT improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.81]), whereas the addition of BT did not significantly improve OS (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.36]). In a network meta-analysis, EBRT plus ADT had improved OS compared with EBRT plus BT (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89]). Bayesian modeling demonstrated an 88% probability that EBRT plus ADT resulted in superior OS compared with EBRT plus BT. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that current practice patterns of omitting ADT with EBRT plus BT may result in inferior OS compared with EBRT plus ADT in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. ADT for these men should remain a critical component of treatment regardless of radiotherapy delivery method until randomized evidence demonstrates otherwise.

Determinants of biochemical failure and distant metastases-free survival in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 371-371
Author(s):  
Avinash Pilar ◽  
Andrew Bayley ◽  
Danny Shehata ◽  
Zhihui (Amy) Liu ◽  
Alejandro Berlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Biochemical Failure ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

371 Background: Objectives were to1) identify predictors of biochemical failure(BCF) -free survival (FFS) & distant metastases free-survival (DMFS) in high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); 2) assess the impact of nodal irradiation & escalation of dose to the nodal volumes in HRPC. Methods: Between Feb 2000 & May 2011, 462 patients with HRPC were treated with EBRT +/- ADT. This spanned an era of technical development; prior to 2002 conventional dose radiotherapy was routinely delivered, between 2002-2008, dose escalation to the prostate & pelvic lymph nodes was undertaken in a phase II trial & subsequently all patients were treated with a dose-escalated protocol. The disease characteristics included, a median PSA of 20ng/ml (range: 1-563), T3-T4 in 33% (n=158), & Gleason grade group (GGG) 3-5 in 72% (n=331). The majority (n=405, 88%) received ADT with EBRT & median duration of ADT was 36 months (range: 0-197). Dose escalated EBRT was utilized in 52% (n=241) & nodal irradiation in 69% (n=317); escalation of dose to nodal volumes was performed in 20% (n=93). Results: The median follow-up was 8.7yrs (range: 0.9-18.9). Median nadir PSA was < 0.05ng/ml (range: <0.05-5.78) with median time to nadir (TTN) of 11 months (range: 2-130). Cumulative incidence rates of BCF at 5 and 10-yrs were 23% & 45%; corresponding rates for DM were 6.6% & 14%, respectively. The 5 & 10-yr FFS rates were 75% & 51%; corresponding DMFS rates were 91.5% & 80%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, T stage (p<0.001), GGG (p<0.001), ADT (p=0.002), dose escalation to prostate (P=0.012) & median nadir PSA (p<0.001) were independent predictors of FFS. The GGG (p=0.007), median nadir PSA (p=<0.001) & Nodal RT (p=0.03) were independent predictors of DMFS. PSA of 20 & TTN predicted neither FFS nor DMFS. Conclusions: Nadir PSA level was an independent predictor of FFS & DMFS. Undetectable PSA level was associated with prolonged FFS & DMFS. Dose escalation to prostate resulted in an improved FFS & Nodal irradiation in an improved DMFS. Further studies are required to identify subgroups that may benefit the most from nodal irradiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document