Test–retest reliability and correlates of the 6‐min walk test in people with alcohol use disorders

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Hannelore Vandael ◽  
Mats Hallgren ◽  
Tine Van Damme
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Alcohol Use Disorders ◽  
Walk Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals Test-retest reliability and clinical correlates of the Eurofit test battery in people with alcohol use disorders

2019 ◽  
Vol 271 ◽  
pp. 208-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Mats Hallgren ◽  
Hannelore Vandael ◽  
Michel Probst ◽  
Brendon Stubbs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Alcohol Use Disorders ◽  
Test Battery ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Clinical Correlates ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals AB0882 RELIABILITY OF THE 3-M BACKWARDS WALK TEST IN PATIENTS WITH REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1746.2-1746
Author(s):  
B. Unver ◽  
K. Sevik ◽  
V. Karatosun
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Fall Risk ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Walk Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background:Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for patients suffering from end-stage osteoarthritis with 10- to 15-year implant survivorship rates exceeding 90%. Infection, osteolysis due to polyethylene wear, loosening, stiffness and instability may cause to implant failure and revision of the TKA (rTKA). However, up to 20% of patients continue to have postoperative pain, functional limitations and low treatment satisfaction and 24% of patients were not able to walk unaided with no limp or a slight limp after TKA [1].Falls and related traumas can produce “fracture, dislocation, crushing, and other injuries” [2]. Falls often occur due to impaired physical function which includes changes in lower knee joint angle, weakened lower limb muscles, peripheral nerve blockade, deformity of the foot limited balance and gait.Several measures of fall risk have been previously developed however, recent research has demonstrated that backwards walking is more sensitive at identifying changes in mobility and balance compared to forward walking. Backwards walking is necessary to perform such tasks as backing up to a chair, opening up a door or getting out of the way of a sudden obstacle.3-M Backwards Walk Test (3MBWT) is used to evaluate walking skills, fall risk and dynamic balance. The 3MBWT demonstrated similar or better diagnostic accuracy for falls in the past year than the most commonly used measures and found to be reliable in healthy subjects. [3] However, its reliability in rTKA has not been investigated.Objectives:The purposes of this study were to determine the test-retest reliability and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the 3MBWT in patients with rTKAMethods:Twenty-two patients with rTKA, operated on by the same surgeon, were included. For the 3MBWT, a distance of 3 meters was marked with tape and participants were asked to align their heels with the black tape. They were instructed to walk backwards as quickly. Patients performed trials for 3MBWT twice on the same day. Between the trials, patients waited for an hour on sitting position to prevent fatigue.Results:The 3MBWT showed an excellent test-retest reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficient ICC for 3MBWT was 0.97. The standard error of measurement and MCID at the 95% confidence level for 3MBWT were 1,08 and 2,99 respectively.Conclusion:The 3MBWT has an excellent test-retest reliability in patients with rTKA. It is an effective and reliable tool for measuring fall risk, dynamic balance and walking skills. As a clinical test, the 3MBWT is easy to score, has no cost, needs no special equipment and can be applied in a short time as part of the routine medical examination.References:[1]Shan L, Shan B, Suzuki A et al. Intermediate and long-term quality of life after total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBJS 2015; 97: 156-168.[2]Johnson RL, Duncan CM, Ahn KS et al. Fall-Prevention Strategies and Patient Characteristics That Impact Fall Rates After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2014; 119: 1113-1118.[3]Carter V, Jain T, James J et al. The 3-m Backwards Walk and Retrospective Falls: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Clinical Measure. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2017.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Test–retest reliability and developmental evolution of the 6-min walk test in Caucasian boys aged 5–12years

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Goemans ◽  
Katrijn Klingels ◽  
Marleen van den Hauwe ◽  
Anneleen Van Orshoven ◽  
Sofie Vanpraet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Walk Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Developmental Evolution ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Validity and Reliability of the Computer-Administered Routine Opioid Outcome Monitoring (ROOM) Tool

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3645-3654
Author(s):  
Louisa Picco ◽  
Melissa Middleton ◽  
Raimondo Bruno ◽  
Michala Kowalski ◽  
Suzanne Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Outcome Monitoring ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Objective The Routine Opioid Outcome Monitoring (ROOM) tool measures outcomes with opioids using an established framework which includes domains such as pain, mood, opioid use disorder, alcohol use, and constipation. This study aims to validate and establish the test-retest reliability of the computer-administered ROOM tool. Design and Setting Cross-sectional analysis of an online sample. Subjects Participants comprised those with chronic noncancer pain who regularly used prescription opioids. Methods Participants self-completed the online ROOM tool along with other validated measures (validation questionnaire), and those who were agreeable also completed the online test-retest questionnaire approximately two weeks later. Subcomponents of the ROOM tool (i.e., pain, mood, alcohol use, opioid use disorder, and constipation) were validated against longer measures of the same construct using Pearson correlation coefficients. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the stability of the ROOM tool over time. Results A total of 324 participants completed the validation questionnaire, of whom 260 also completed the test-retest questionnaire. The opioid use disorder domain showed good sensitivity (73.6) and specificity (75.8) against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, any opioid use disorder. All ROOM components showed moderate correlation (r = 0.55–0.73) with their longer counterparts. Test-retest reliability was fair (0.58–0.75), indicating that responses were relatively stable over time. Reliability did vary, however, based on the components being measured and how certain tools were scored. Conclusion The computer-administered ROOM tool is a valid approach for brief monitoring of outcomes with prescribed opioids in primary care settings and appears to be acceptable to people who are using prescribed opioids for chronic pain.

Drug Users’ Test-Retest Reliability of Self-Reported Alcohol Use on the Risk Behavior Assessment

2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 925-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Johnson ◽  
Deborah K. Pratt ◽  
David B. Neal ◽  
Dennis G. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Risk Behavior ◽  
Drug Users ◽  
Behavior Assessment ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document