Novel outcome measures for clinical trials in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) have leveraged the use of digital technology to overcome limitations in treatment and disease monitoring. OBJECTIVE To review the use of digital technology in concluded and ongoing MS clinical trials. METHODS In March 2020, we searched for “multiple sclerosis” and “trial” on pubmed.gov and clinicaltrials.gov using “app”, “digital”, “electronic”, “internet” and “mobile” as additional search words, separately. Overall, we included thirty-five studies. RESULTS Digital technology is part of clinical trial interventions to deliver psychotherapy and motor rehabilitation, with exergames, e-training, and robot-assisted exercises. Also, digital technology has become increasingly used to standardise previously existing outcome measures, with automatic acquisitions, reduced inconsistencies, and improved detection of symptoms. Some trials have been developing new patient-centred outcome measures for the detection of symptoms and of treatment side effects and adherence. CONCLUSIONS We will discuss how digital technology has been changing MS clinical trial design, and possible future directions for MS and neurology research.

Download Full-text

ePS5.02 Development of mental health quality outcome measures in the Swedish Cystic Fibrosis Registry - pitfalls and possibilities

Journal of Cystic Fibrosis ◽

10.1016/s1569-1993(20)30321-0 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 19 ◽

pp. S49

Author(s):

L. Backström Eriksson ◽

C. Laine ◽

I. de Monestrol ◽

A. Lindblad ◽

E. Bergenmar-Ivarsson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Cystic Fibrosis ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Health Quality

Download Full-text

Variation in treatment preferences of pulmonary exacerbations among Australian and New Zealand cystic fibrosis physicians

BMJ Open Respiratory Research ◽

10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000956 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. e000956

Author(s):

Grace Currie ◽

Anna Tai ◽

Tom Snelling ◽

André Schultz

Keyword(s):

Cystic Fibrosis ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

New Zealand ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Early Response ◽

Treatment Preferences ◽

Dornase Alfa ◽

Clinical Scenarios ◽

Professional Opinion ◽

Pulmonary Exacerbations

BackgroundDespite advances in cystic fibrosis (CF) management and survival, the optimal treatment of pulmonary exacerbations remains unclear. Understanding the variability in treatment approaches among physicians might help prioritise clinical uncertainties to address through clinical trials.MethodsPhysicians from Australia and New Zealand who care for people with CF were invited to participate in a web survey of treatment preferences for CF pulmonary exacerbations. Six typical clinical scenarios were presented; three to paediatric and another three to adult physicians. For each scenario, physicians were asked to choose treatment options and provide reasons for their choices.ResultsForty-nine CF physicians (31 paediatric and 18 adult medicine) participated; more than half reported 10+ years of experience. There was considerable variation in primary antibiotic selection; none was preferred by more than half of respondents in any scenario. For secondary antibiotic therapy, respondents consistently preferred intravenous tobramycin and a third antibiotic was rarely prescribed, except in one scenario describing an adult patient. Hypertonic saline nebulisation and twice daily chest physiotherapy was preferred in most scenarios while dornase alfa use was more variable. Most CF physicians (>80%) preferred to change therapy if there was no early response. Professional opinion was the most common reason for antibiotic choice.ConclusionsVariation exists among CF physicians in their preferred choice of primary antibiotic and use of dornase alfa. These preferences are driven by professional opinion, possibly reflecting a lack of evidence to base policy recommendations. Evidence from high-quality clinical trials is needed to inform physician decision making.

Download Full-text

Use of connected digital products in clinical research following the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047341 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (6) ◽

pp. e047341

Author(s):

Caroline Marra ◽

William J Gordon ◽

Ariel Dora Stern

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Clinical Research ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Remote Monitoring ◽

Search Algorithm ◽

Primary Outcome Measure ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Digital Products ◽

Clinical Trial Registry ◽

Before And After

ObjectivesIn an effort to mitigate COVID-19 related challenges for clinical research, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued new guidance for the conduct of ‘virtual’ clinical trials in late March 2020. This study documents trends in the use of connected digital products (CDPs), tools that enable remote patient monitoring and telehealth consultation, in clinical trials both before and after the onset of the pandemic.DesignWe applied a comprehensive text search algorithm to clinical trial registry data to identify trials that use CDPs for remote monitoring or telehealth. We compared CDP use in the months before and after the issuance of FDA guidance facilitating virtual clinical trials.SettingAll trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with start dates from May 2019 through February 2021.Outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was the overall percentage of CDP use in clinical trials started in the 10 months prior to the pandemic onset (May 2019–February 2020) compared with the 10 months following (May 2020–February 2021). Secondary outcome measures included CDP usage by trial type (interventional, observational), funder type (industry, non-industry) and diagnoses (COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 participants).ResultsCDP usage in clinical trials increased by only 1.65 percentage points, from 14.19% (n=23 473) of all trials initiated in the 10 months prior to the pandemic onset to 15.84% (n=26 009) of those started in the 10 months following (p<0.01). The increase occurred primarily in observational studies and non-industry funded trials and was driven entirely by CDP usage in trials for COVID-19.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that in the short-term, new options created by regulatory guidance to stimulate telehealth and remote monitoring were not widely incorporated into clinical research. In the months immediately following the pandemic onset, CDP adoption increased primarily in observational and non-industry funded studies where virtual protocols are likely medically necessary due to the participants’ COVID-19 diagnosis.

Download Full-text