Comparison Between Non-equilibrium Atmospheric-Pressure and Low-Pressure Plasma Treatments of Poly(styrene-butadiene-styrene) Elastomers

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (S1) ◽  
pp. S419-S424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Tyczkowski ◽  
Jakub Zieliński ◽  
Agnieszka Kopa ◽  
Iwona Krawczyk ◽  
Bogusław Woźniak
Keyword(s):  
Atmospheric Pressure ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Pressure Plasma ◽  
Plasma Treatments ◽  
Low Pressure Plasma ◽  
Styrene Butadiene Styrene ◽  
Styrene Butadiene ◽  
Butadiene Styrene ◽  
Non Equilibrium

scholarly journals Influence of Low-Pressure Plasma on the Surface Properties of CAD-CAM Leucite-Reinforced Feldspar and Resin Matrix Ceramics

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 8856
Author(s):  
Pablo Sevilla ◽  
Carlos Lopez-Suarez ◽  
Jesús Pelaez ◽  
Celia Tobar ◽  
Veronica Rodriguez-Alonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Plasma Treatment ◽  
Surface Properties ◽  
Ceramic Materials ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Resin Matrix ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Pressure Plasma ◽  
Plasma Treatments ◽  
Low Pressure Plasma

The introduction of new ceramic materials for dental restorations is currently a reality; however, little information is available on their surface treatment for the bonding process. Furthermore, surface treatment with plasma on ceramic materials has been recently introduced, although not many studies are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface properties of a leucite-reinforced feldspar ceramic (LIC) and resin matrix ceramic (RMC) after low-pressure plasma treatment. From each material, 48 discs were prepared and subject to surface treatment. The LIC group was treated by hydrofluoric acid (HF) (LIC-HF), plasma with oxygen (LIC-O2), and plasma with argon (LIC-Ar). The RMC group was treated by sandblasting with alumina (RMC-SB), plasma with oxygen (RMC-O2), and plasma with argon (RMC-Ar). The groups whose surfaces were not subjected to treatment were considered as the control group. Surface wettability and roughness was analyzed. The results showed significant differences among the treatments for both ceramics regarding wettability and roughness. Plasma treatments increased the wettability and had a very low effect on the roughness. Plasma treatments achieved similar values for both surface properties in each ceramic group with no differences between both treatments. Plasma treatment seems to be a promising alternative for ceramic surface treatments since it increased the surface energy of the ceramics analyzed and hardly affects the roughness. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of plasma treatment on the bond strength of ceramics.

Effects of low pressure plasma treatments on DSSCs based on rutile TiO2 array photoanodes

2015 ◽  
Vol 324 ◽  
pp. 143-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiqi Wang ◽  
Jiazang Chen ◽  
Jianqiang Luo ◽  
Yuzhi Zhang ◽  
Lian Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Pressure ◽  
Rutile Tio2 ◽  
Pressure Plasma ◽  
Plasma Treatments ◽  
Low Pressure Plasma

Creation of a conductive surface layer on polypropylene samples by low‐pressure plasma treatments

1995 ◽  
Vol 77 (11) ◽  
pp. 5695-5701 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Collaud Coen ◽  
P. Groening ◽  
G. Dietler ◽  
L. Schlapbach
Keyword(s):  
Surface Layer ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Pressure Plasma ◽  
Plasma Treatments ◽  
Conductive Surface ◽  
Low Pressure Plasma

scholarly journals Seed Disinfection Effect of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma and Low Pressure Plasma on Rhizoctonia solani

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
TERUMI NISHIOKA ◽  
YUICHIRO TAKAI ◽  
MITSUO KAWARADANI ◽  
KIYOTSUGU OKADA ◽  
HIDEO TANIMOTO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rhizoctonia Solani ◽  
Atmospheric Pressure ◽  
Atmospheric Pressure Plasma ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Pressure Plasma ◽  
Low Pressure Plasma ◽  
Seed Disinfection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document