scholarly journals Effects of a brief intervention program for patients with cancer and their partners on feelings of inequity, relationship quality and psychological distress

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 321-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roeline G. Kuijer ◽  
Bram P. Buunk ◽  
G. Majella de Jong ◽  
Jan F. Ybema ◽  
Robbert Sanderman
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Relationship Quality ◽  
Brief Intervention ◽  
Intervention Program ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Bereavement risk assessment of family caregivers of patients with cancer: Japanese version of the Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 448-452
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Uchida ◽  
Noriaki Satake ◽  
Toshimichi Nakaho ◽  
Akira Inoue ◽  
Hidemitsu Saito
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Risk Assessment Tool ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Distress Scale

AbstractObjectivesThe Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool (BRAT) seems to be useful in identifying those who are likely to suffer from the more severe consequences of bereavement. To date, however, only a few studies have examined bereavement risk using the BRAT. This study investigated bereavement risk in family caregivers of patients with cancer using the Japanese version of the Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool (BRAT-J). We also investigated the relationship of bereavement risk with psychological distress and resilience among caregivers to determine the validity of the BRAT-J.MethodsWe conducted family psychoeducation in the palliative care unit of Tohoku University Hospital with participants who were recruited in this study. Among the participants, 50 family caregivers provided their written informed consent and were included in this study. Participants were assessed using the BRAT-J and completed the Japanese version of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) and the Tachikawa Resilience Scale (TRS).ResultsAccording to the BRAT-J, five individuals (10%) were in the high category of bereavement risk (level 4 or 5). We also found that family caregivers of patients experienced many different pressures, such as facing the unknown; their own work; and insufficient financial, practical, or physical resources. These issues are associated with various mental problems. Additionally, the level of bereavement risk was significantly correlated with K6 scores (ρ = 0.30, p = 0.032), and the TRS score (ρ = –0.44, p = 0.001). These correlations confirmed previous findings and that the BRAT-J can be an efficient screening tool for the bereavement risk of family caregivers of patients with cancer.Significance of resultsIt appears that the BRAT-J is useful in predicting the likelihood of difficulties or complications in bereavement for family caregivers and could help to provide support with these issues when needed.

scholarly journals Feeling the Absence of Touch: Distancing, Distress, Regulation, and Relationships in the Context of COVID-19

2021 ◽  
pp. 026540752110526
Author(s):  
Mary H Burleson ◽  
Nicole A Roberts ◽  
Aubrie A Munson ◽  
Cayla J Duncan ◽  
Ashley K Randall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Relationship Quality ◽  
Affect Regulation ◽  
Romantic Relationship ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Physical Contact ◽  
Viral Spread ◽  
Positive Behaviors ◽  
Romantic Relationship Quality

During the COVID-19 pandemic, physical distancing guidelines were implemented to reduce viral spread, altering typical social interactions and reducing the amount of physical contact and affectionate touch many individuals experienced. The pandemic also caused psychological distress, perhaps in part related to reductions in affectionate touch with close others. We theorized that this would be particularly problematic for individuals reliant on affectionate touch to help regulate their emotions. Using online survey data collected nationwide from married or romantically partnered adults ( N = 585), we examined how physical distancing (moderated by cohabiting with spouse/partner) and affectionate touch with close others (moderated by individual differences in typical use and efficacy of touch for affect regulation [TAR]) related to individual psychological distress and romantic relationship quality. As hypothesized, more physical distancing was associated with less affectionate touch among non-cohabiters, but surprisingly with more touch among cohabiters. Also as hypothesized, participants higher in TAR and experiencing less affectionate touch reported more psychological distress than those similarly high in TAR and experiencing more affectionate touch, or than those lower in TAR. Unexpectedly, more physical distancing was associated directly with lower psychological distress and better relationship quality. Better relationship quality was linked directly to more affectionate touch and greater endorsement of TAR. Thus, for those cohabiting in satisfying romantic relationships, physical distancing may facilitate relationship-positive behaviors. Further, individual differences in TAR may influence the potency of touch effects on mood and stress.

The Psychiatric Assessment and Brief Intervention Program

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreea L. Seritan ◽  
Ellen Haller ◽  
Paul Linde ◽  
Susan Orgera ◽  
Weston S. Fisher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brief Intervention ◽  
Intervention Program ◽  
Psychiatric Assessment

Mindfulness-based intervention to reduce burnout and psychological distress, and improve wellbeing in psychiatry trainees: a pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Kang ◽  
Rob Selzer ◽  
Harry Gibbs ◽  
Katie Bourke ◽  
Abdul-Rahman Hudaib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Work Performance ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Intervention Program ◽  
Limiting Factors ◽  
Healthcare Staff ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Metropolitan Hospital

Background: Healthcare professionals including psychiatry trainees experience high amounts of occupational stress. This pilot study aims to assess the impacts and feasibility of a mindfulness-based intervention program as an occupational intervention in a metropolitan hospital. Method: Psychiatry trainees participated in an mindfulness-based intervention training program consisting of 1-h weekly sessions over 8 weeks. Levels of psychological distress and mindfulness were measured pre and post-intervention. Qualitative data through an open-ended feedback survey were also collected. Results There was an improved level of mindfulness and a decreased level of burnout among trainees post-intervention. Advantages of the program included having a compassionate facilitator and the program being tailored to healthcare staff. Limiting factors included time restraints and clinical responsibilities. Conclusion: Psychiatry trainees can benefit from an occupational MBI program. This can positively impact their health as well as improve their work performance. A number of factors important for implementation of a mindfulness-based intervention program were also identified.

scholarly journals Comment on ‘Psychological distress in patients with cancer: is screening the effective solution?’

2013 ◽  
Vol 108 (12) ◽  
pp. 2628-2630 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Dekker ◽  
A T F Beekman ◽  
A D Boenink ◽  
H Bomhof-Roordink ◽  
A M Braamse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Effective Solution ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Dyadic associations between psychological distress and sleep disturbance among Chinese patients with cancer and their spouses

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 856-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessie S.M. Chan ◽  
Nancy Xiaonan Yu ◽  
Amy Y.M. Chow ◽  
Cecilia L.W. Chan ◽  
Ka-Fai Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Trajectories of Psychological Distress in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients With Cancer: A 1-Year Longitudinal Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (17) ◽  
pp. 2160-2166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minyoung Kwak ◽  
Brad J. Zebrack ◽  
Kathleen A. Meeske ◽  
Leanne Embry ◽  
Christine Aguilar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Young Adult ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Brief Symptom Inventory ◽  
Adolescent And Young Adult ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Clinical Predictors ◽  
Population Norms ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Purpose To examine prevalence and changes in symptoms of psychological distress over 1 year after initial cancer diagnosis in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of changes in distress were examined. Patients and Methods In this multisite, longitudinal, prospective study of an ethnically diverse sample, 215 patients age 14 to 39 years were assessed for psychological distress within the first 4 months of diagnosis and again 6 and 12 months later. Linear mixed models with random intercept and slope estimated changes in distress, as measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Results Within the first 4 months of diagnosis, 60 respondents (28%) had BSI-18 scores suggesting caseness for distress. On average, distress symptoms exceeded population norms at the time of diagnosis, dipped at the 6-month follow-up, but increased to a level exceeding population norms at the 12-month follow-up. A statistically significant decline in distress over 1 year was observed; however, the gradient of change was not clinically significant. Multivariate analyses revealed that the reduction in distress over time was primarily a function of being off treatment and involved in school or work. Notably, cancer type or severity was not associated with distress. Conclusion Findings emphasize the importance of early psychosocial intervention for distress in AYAs as well as the need to manage treatment-related symptoms and facilitate AYAs' involvement in work or school to the extent possible. Continued research is needed to understand how distress relates to quality of life, functional outcomes, treatment, and symptom burden throughout the continuum of care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document