A systematic review on patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivors of randomised clinical trials: direction for future research

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 721-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuping Li ◽  
Yi Lin ◽  
Xiwen Liu ◽  
Yongyong Xu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trials ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes from international randomised clinical trials on cancer: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. e685-e698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justyna Mierzynska ◽  
Claire Piccinin ◽  
Madeline Pe ◽  
Francesca Martinelli ◽  
Carolyn Gotay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Reported

Time to deterioration in cancer randomized clinical trials for patient-reported outcomes data: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 867-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Charton ◽  
B. Cuer ◽  
F. Cottone ◽  
F. Efficace ◽  
C. Touraine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Rare use of patient-reported outcomes in childhood cancer clinical trials – a systematic review of clinical trial registries

2021 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 90-99
Author(s):  
David Riedl ◽  
Maria Rothmund ◽  
Anne-Sophie Darlington ◽  
Samantha Sodergren ◽  
Roman Crazzolara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Trial Registries ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Correction: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Clinical Trials: Is ‘In-Trial’ Guidance Lacking? A Systematic Review

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek G. Kyte ◽  
Heather Draper ◽  
Jonathan Ives ◽  
Clive Liles ◽  
Adrian Gheorghe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes following Surgical Treatment of Lymphedema

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Coriddi ◽  
Joseph Dayan ◽  
Nikhil Sobti ◽  
David Nash ◽  
Johanna Goldberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Secondary Lymphedema ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Life Impact

Introduction: Analysis of quality of life (QOL) outcomes is an important aspect of lymphedema treatment since this disease can substantially impact QOL in affected individuals. There are a growing number of studies reporting patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) for patients with lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of outcomes and utilization of PROMs following surgical treatment of lymphedema. Methods: A literature search of four databases was performed up to and including March, 2019. Studies included reported on QOL outcomes after physiologic procedures, defined as either lymphovenous bypass (LVB) or vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT), to treat upper and/or lower extremity primary or secondary lymphedema. Results: In total, 850 studies were screened—of which, 32 studies were included in this review. Lymphovenous bypass was the surgical intervention in 16 studies, VLNT in 11 studies, and both in 5 studies. Of the 32 total studies, 16 used validated survey tools. The most commonly used PROM was the lymph quality of life measure for limb lymphedema (LYMQOL) (12 studies). In the remaining four studies, the upper limb lymphedema 27 scale (ULL27), the short form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), the lymphedema functioning, disability and health questionnaire (Lymph-ICF), and lymphedema life impact scale (LLIS) were each used once. QOL improvement following surgical treatment was noted in all studies. Conclusions: Physiologic surgical treatment of lymphedema results in improved QOL outcomes in most patients. The use of validated PROM tools is increasing but there is no current consensus on use. Future research to evaluate the psychometric properties of PROMs in lymphedema is needed to guide the development and use of lymphedema-specific tools.

scholarly journals The impact of having both cancer and diabetes on patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and directions for future research

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline A. J. Vissers ◽  
Louise Falzon ◽  
Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse ◽  
Frans Pouwer ◽  
Melissa S. Y. Thong
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document