Parent-adolescent concordance on the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) and the Childhood Interview for Borderline Personality Disorder (CI-BPD)

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Wall ◽  
C. Sharp ◽  
Y. Ahmed ◽  
M. Goodman ◽  
M.C. Zanarini
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Borderline Personality

scholarly journals Induced illusory body ownership in borderline personality disorder

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli S Neustadter ◽  
Sarah K Fineberg ◽  
Jacob Leavitt ◽  
Meagan M Carr ◽  
Philip R Corlett
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Predictive Coding ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Body Ownership ◽  
Clinical Literature ◽  
Proprioceptive Drift

Abstract One aspect of selfhood that may have relevance for borderline personality disorder (BPD) is variation in sense of body ownership. We employed the rubber hand illusion to manipulate sense of body ownership in BPD. We extended previous research on illusory body ownership in BPD by testing: (i) two illusion conditions: asynchronous and synchronous stimulation, (ii) relationship between illusion experience and BPD symptoms, and (iii) relationship between illusion experience and maladaptive personality traits. We measured illusion strength (questionnaire responses), proprioceptive drift (perceived shift in physical hand position), BPD symptoms (Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines score), and maladaptive personality traits (Personality Inventory for DSM-5) in 24 BPD and 21 control participants. For subjective illusion strength, we found main effects of group (BPD > healthy control, F(1, 43) = 11.94, P = 0.001) and condition (synchronous > asynchronous, F(1, 43) = 22.80, P < 0.001). There was a group × condition interaction for proprioceptive drift (F(1, 43) = 6.48, P = 0.015) such that people with BPD maintained illusion susceptibility in the asynchronous condition. Borderline symptom severity correlated with illusion strength within the BPD group, and this effect was specific to affective (r = 0.45, P < 0.01) and cognitive symptoms (r = 0.46, P < 0.01). Across all participants, trait psychoticism correlated with illusion strength (r = 0.44, P < 0.01). People with BPD are more susceptible to illusory body ownership than controls. This is consistent with the clinical literature describing aberrant physical and emotional experiences of self in BPD. A predictive coding framework holds promise to develop testable mechanistic hypotheses for disrupted bodily self in BPD.

Stability of Borderline Personality Disorder

1993 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. Links ◽  
M. Janice E. Mitton ◽  
Meir Steiner
Keyword(s):  
Substance Abuse ◽  
Borderline Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Psychiatric Care ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Young Age ◽  
Course Of Illness ◽  
Show Evidence

This study examines the course of illness and stability of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a group of inpatients seen at a two-year follow-up. The diagnosis of borderline personality disorder, as established by the use of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines, did not change in 39 of the 65 subjects (60%) studied. Subjects who continued to show evidence of borderline psychopathology experienced more acute episodes of illness during the follow-up period and tended to be more involved in substance abuse. Impulsiveness and young age when first psychiatric care was received significantly predicted the presence of BPD features at follow-up.

A prospective investigation of the development of borderline personality symptoms

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1311-1334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Carlson ◽  
Byron Egeland ◽  
L. Alan Sroufe
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Middle Childhood ◽  
Developmental Psychopathology ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Mediating Effect ◽  
Disorder Symptom ◽  
Attachment Disorganization ◽  
The Individual

AbstractThe antecedents and developmental course of borderline personality disorder symptoms were examined prospectively from infancy to adulthood using longitudinal data from a risk sample (N= 162). Borderline personality disorder symptom counts were derived from the Structured Clinical Interview forDSMDisorders diagnostic interview at age 28 years. Correlational analyses confirmed expected relations between borderline symptoms and contemporary adult disturbance (e.g., self-injurious behavior, dissociative symptoms, drug use, relational violence) as well as maltreatment history. Antecedent correlational and regression analyses revealed significant links between borderline symptoms in adulthood and endogenous (i.e., temperament) and environmental (e.g., attachment disorganization, parental hostility) history in early childhood and disturbance across domains of child functioning (e.g., attention, emotion, behavior, relationship, self-representation) in middle childhood/early adolescence. Process analyses revealed a significant mediating effect of self-representation on the relation between attachment disorganization on borderline symptoms. The findings are discussed within a developmental psychopathology framework in which disturbance in self-processes is constructed through successive transactions between the individual and environment.

Psychopathology in Offspring of Mothers with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Pilot Study

1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 285-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Weiss ◽  
Phyllis Zelkowitz ◽  
Ronald B Feldman ◽  
Judy Vogel ◽  
Marsha Heyman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Affective Disorders ◽  
Impulse Control ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Verbal Abuse ◽  
Psychiatric Diagnoses ◽  
Spectrum Disorders

Objective: Children of mothers with borderline personality disorder (BPD) were hypothesized to be at greater risk for psychopathology, particularly impulse spectrum disorders, than children of mothers with other personality disorders. Method: Twenty-one index children were compared with 23 children of mothers with a nonborderline personality disorder. Diagnoses were obtained using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia–Episodic Version (KSADS-E) and the Child Diagnostic Interview for BPD (CDIB), and functioning was rated with the Child Global Assessment Schedule (CGAS). Physical, sexual, and verbal abuse, as well as family violence and placements, were also assessed. Results: The children of the borderline mothers, as compared with controls, had more psychiatric diagnoses, more impulse control disorders, a higher frequency of child BPD, and lower CGAS scores. There were no differences between the groups for trauma. Conclusion: The offspring of borderline mothers are at high risk for psychopathology.

scholarly journals Borderline personality disorder co-morbidity: relationship to the internalizing–externalizing structure of common mental disorders

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1041-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. Eaton ◽  
R. F. Krueger ◽  
K. M. Keyes ◽  
A. E. Skodol ◽  
K. E. Markon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Dysthymic Disorder ◽  
Post Traumatic Stress ◽  
Co Morbidity

BackgroundBorderline personality disorder (BPD) shows high levels of co-morbidity with an array of psychiatric disorders. The meaning and causes of this co-morbidity are not fully understood. Our objective was to investigate and clarify the complex co-morbidity of BPD by integrating it into the structure of common mental disorders.MethodWe conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on diagnostic interview data from a representative US population-based sample of 34 653 civilian, non-institutionalized individuals aged ⩾18 years. We modeled the structure of lifetime DSM-IV diagnoses of BPD and antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, panic disorder with agoraphobia, social phobia, specific phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence, nicotine dependence, marijuana dependence, and any other drug dependence.ResultsIn both women and men, the internalizing–externalizing structure of common mental disorders captured the co-morbidity among all disorders including BPD. Although BPD was unidimensional in terms of its symptoms, BPD as a disorder showed associations with both the distress subfactor of the internalizing dimension and the externalizing dimension.ConclusionsThe complex patterns of co-morbidity observed with BPD represent connections to other disorders at the level of latent internalizing and externalizing dimensions. BPD is meaningfully connected with liabilities shared with common mental disorders, and these liability dimensions provide a beneficial focus for understanding the co-morbidity, etiology and treatment of BPD.

Severity as a Diagnostic Dimension of Borderline Personality Disorder

1994 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 540-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Marziali ◽  
Heather Munroe-Blum ◽  
Paul Links
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Specific Pattern ◽  
Social Adaptation ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Axis Ii ◽  
Research Interviews ◽  
Axis I

The purpose of this study was to identify diagnostic and severity subgroups within a cohort of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Of 171 patients clinically diagnosed with BPD, 132 were Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) positive. Through a process of random selection, 41 of the DIB positive subjects were also interviewed with the revised version of the DIB (DIBR) and approximately one half with two semi-structured research interviews, the Schedule for Affective Disorders (SADS) and the Personality Disorder Examination (PDE). All subjects completed four self-report measures of problematic behaviours, symptoms and social adaptation. The analyses included examination of: 1. the correspondence of the BPD diagnosis across the DIB, the DIBR and the PDE; 2. the association between DIBR scoring levels and scores on measures of symptoms and behavioural status; and 3. the co-occurrence of BPD with Axis I and other Axis II disorders. Correlations and analyses of variance between both the DIB and DIBR scoring levels and the scores on the four symptom and behavioural measures showed that the scoring levels (DIB 7 to 10; DIBR 8 to 10) could be used to distinguish three subgroups of BPD. The three groups differed in terms of concordance for BPD with the PDE and in terms of patterns of overlap with DSM-III-R, Axis I and other Axis II disorders. This study shows that BPD subgroups can be located on a continuum of symptomatic and behavioural severity and that each subgroup has a specific pattern of overlap with Axis I and other Axis II disorders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document