Publication trends for single‐case methodology in school psychology: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 683-698
Author(s):  
Keith C. Radley ◽  
Evan H. Dart ◽  
Aaron J. Fischer ◽  
Tai A. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
School Psychology ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Publication Trends ◽  
Case Methodology

Reporting Single-Case Research in The Neurorehabilitation Literature: A Systematic Review Indicates There is Room for Improvement

2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. e106
Author(s):  
Robyn Tate ◽  
Linda Sigmundsdottir ◽  
Janet Doubleday ◽  
Ulrike Rosenkoetter ◽  
Donna Wakim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Case Research ◽  
Single Case Research

E-voting adoption in many countries: A literature review

2021 ◽  
pp. 205789112110405
Author(s):  
Ikhsan Darmawan
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Research Question ◽  
The United States ◽  
Single Case Study ◽  
Academic Publications ◽  
Research Questions

Although the number of countries that have adopted e-voting has decreased lately, the number of academic publications on e-voting adoption has increased in the last two years. To date, there is no coherent narrative in the existing literature that explains the progress of the research on e-voting adoption. This article aims to answer the following research question: “How has research on the topic of e-voting adoption progressed over the last 15 years?” The article provides a semi-systematic review of 78 studies that were conducted from 2005 to 2020. In this article, I argue that although the studies on e-voting adoption are dominated by a single case study, by research in the United States, and by the positivist paradigm, scholars have employed the term “e-voting adoption” diversely and the research on e-voting adoption has evolved to address more specific research questions. Recommendations for the future agenda of research on e-voting adoption are also discussed.

scholarly journals Consistency in Single-Case ABAB Phase Designs: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
pp. 014544551985379 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Tanious ◽  
Tamal Kumar De ◽  
Bart Michiels ◽  
Wim Van den Noortgate ◽  
Patrick Onghena
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Single Case

scholarly journals Sports-related concussion (SRC) assessment in road cycling: a systematic review and call to action

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Elliott ◽  
Richard Anderson ◽  
Stephen Collins ◽  
Neil Heron
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Brain Injuries ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
Assessment Protocol ◽  
Published Evidence ◽  
Road Cycling

BackgroundSports-related concussion (SRC) is a recognised risk in road cycling and can have serious health consequences. Recent high-profile cases of professional road cyclists continuing to participate in races despite suffering obvious SRC have highlighted the difficulties in assessing SRC within road cycling.PurposeTo undertake a systematic review of the literature on SRC assessment in road cycling.Study designSystematic review.MethodsLiterature describing SRC assessment in road cycling was identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts for eligibility and a qualitative analysis was undertaken of included studies.ResultsFrom 94 studies identified, two were included for review. Gordonet aldescribe the presentation of a single case of paediatric concussion following a cycling crash. They highlight the utility of SRC evaluation using the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) as well as the importance of a stepwise return-to-play protocol. Greve and Modabber discuss a number of traumatic brain injuries that occurred during the 2011 road cycling season and, as a minimum, call for riders to be withdrawn from competition following loss of consciousness or amnesia. Both studies are at high risk of bias and of low quality.ConclusionRoad cycling poses unique challenges for the assessment of SRC. This review illustrates the lack of published evidence to advise effective means of SRC assessment within road cycling. The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) regulations advise the use of SCAT-5 for concussion assessment but this tool is impractical, requiring modification for use in road cycling. We would like to call on the UCI to hold a consensus meeting to establish an evidence-based SRC assessment protocol and return-to-riding protocol for road cycling.

scholarly journals A Content Analysis of Adoption Articles in Counseling Journals: A 30-Year Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhong Liu ◽  
Rachel P. Jacoby ◽  
Hansori Jang ◽  
Dan Li
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Target Group ◽  
Publication Trends ◽  
Content Areas ◽  
Counseling Practice ◽  
Family Counselors ◽  
The Family ◽  
Adoption Research

This rigorous content analysis offers a systematic review of adoption research in counseling from 1988 to 2017. A total of 45 ( N = 45) articles on adoption across 13 counseling journals, 20 of which were published in The Family Journal, were analyzed. Results of the study revealed patterns in methodological orientations, target group, content areas, and journal and publication trends. Despite an overall increase in publications on adoption 1988–2017, this content analysis manifested a lack of empirical research on adoption within the context of counseling. Themes related to adoption and counseling practice were identified. Implications for family counselors/clinicians and research were discussed.

Integrating routine clinical interventions with single-case methodology: Parallels, differences and bridging strategies

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-109
Author(s):  
Robyn L. Tate ◽  
Michael Perdices ◽  
Donna Wakim
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Case Methods ◽  
Case Methodology ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Building Practice

AbstractClinical practice offers the opportunity for the clinician to be a scientist-practitioner in the workplace. This, in turn, facilitates building practice-based evidence. But this can only occur if the effects of the interventions are objectively and systematically evaluated. To this end, single-case methodology is a valuable tool to implement an intervention in a scientifically rigorous manner and gather data on treatment effectiveness. It is possible to incorporate single-case methods into routine clinical practice by using a few simple strategies. This paper examines the ways in which single-case methodology departs from (a) routine clinical practice and (b) the familiar between-groups research design, such as the randomised controlled trial. It presents five practical strategies that will bridge the gap between routine clinical practice and single-case methodology. The Model for Assessing Treatment Effect is described as providing context for and a framework to self-evaluate the scientific rigour in clinical practice and benchmark service delivery.

scholarly journals Liver Transplantation in Malignancies: A Comprehensive and Systematic Review on Oncological Outcome

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Emina Talakić ◽  
Elmar Janek ◽  
Saulius Mikalauskas ◽  
Peter Schemmer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Tumors ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Oncological Outcome ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Organ Shortage ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Life Years

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Liver transplantation (LT) is today’s standard treatment for both end-stage liver disease and tumors; however, suitable grafts for LT are a scarce resource and outcome after LT is highly dependent on its underlying indication. Thus, patients must be carefully selected to optimize the number of life years gained per graft. This comprehensive and systematic review critically reflects the most recently published oncological outcome data after LT in malignancies based on the preoperative radiological findings. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic literature search was conducted to detect preferentially most recent high-volume series or large database analysis on oncological outcomes after LT for both primary liver cancer and liver metastases between January 1, 2019, and November 14, 2020. A comprehensive review on the radiological assessment of the reviewed liver malignancies is included and its preoperative value for an outcome-driven indication reflected. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty most recent high-volume or relevant studies including a total number of 2,521 patients were identified including 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, and 1 publications on oncological outcome after LT for hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocellular carcinoma, hepatic epitheloid hemangioendothelioma, hepatoblastoma, and both metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and colorectal cancer, respectively. The overall survival is comparable to patients without tumors if patients with malignancies are well selected for LT; however, this is highly dependent on tumor entity, tumor stage, and both neoadjuvant and concomitant treatment. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> LT is a promising option for better survival in patients with malignant liver tumors in selected patients; however, the indication must be critically discussed prior to LT in every single case in the context of organ shortage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document