Environmental life cycle assessment of roof-integrated flexible amorphous silicon/nanocrystalline silicon solar cell laminate

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 802-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. Mohr ◽  
A. Meijer ◽  
M. A. J. Huijbregts ◽  
L. Reijnders
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle Assessment ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Solar Cell ◽  
Amorphous Silicon ◽  
Silicon Solar Cell ◽  
Nanocrystalline Silicon ◽  
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment

scholarly journals Case study of a water bioengineering construction site in Austria. Ecological aspects and application of an environmental life cycle assessment model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. von der Thannen ◽  
S. Hoerbinger ◽  
C. Muellebner ◽  
H. Biber ◽  
H. P. Rauch
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Life Cycle Assessment ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Energy Demand ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Construction Site ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Soil And Water

AbstractRecently, applications of soil and water bioengineering constructions using living plants and supplementary materials have become increasingly popular. Besides technical effects, soil and water bioengineering has the advantage of additionally taking into consideration ecological values and the values of landscape aesthetics. When implementing soil and water bioengineering structures, suitable plants must be selected, and the structures must be given a dimension taking into account potential impact loads. A consideration of energy flows and the potential negative impact of construction in terms of energy and greenhouse gas balance has been neglected until now. The current study closes this gap of knowledge by introducing a method for detecting the possible negative effects of installing soil and water bioengineering measures. For this purpose, an environmental life cycle assessment model has been applied. The impact categories global warming potential and cumulative energy demand are used in this paper to describe the type of impacts which a bioengineering construction site causes. Additionally, the water bioengineering measure is contrasted with a conventional civil engineering structure. The results determine that the bioengineering alternative performs slightly better, in terms of energy demand and global warming potential, than the conventional measure. The most relevant factor is shown to be the impact of the running machines at the water bioengineering construction site. Finally, an integral ecological assessment model for applications of soil and water bioengineering structures should point out the potential negative effects caused during installation and, furthermore, integrate the assessment of potential positive effects due to the development of living plants in the use stage of the structures.

scholarly journals Environmental life cycle assessment of the incorporation of recycled high-density polyethylene to polyethylene pipe grade resins

2021 ◽  
pp. 128580
Author(s):  
Ioan-Robert Istrate ◽  
Rafael Juan ◽  
Mario Martin-Gamboa ◽  
Carlos Domínguez ◽  
Rafael A. García-Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle Assessment ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
High Density Polyethylene ◽  
High Density ◽  
Polyethylene Pipe ◽  
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment

scholarly journals Environmental Life cycle assessment of linoleum

2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 238-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gorree ◽  
J. B. Guinée ◽  
G. Huppes ◽  
L. van Oers
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle Assessment ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document