Nonprofit accountability and the National Center for Charitable Statistics

2001 ◽  
Vol 2001 (31) ◽  
pp. 81-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Pollak ◽  
Linda M. Lampkin
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 747-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Williamson ◽  
Belinda Luke ◽  
Diana Leat ◽  
Craig Furneaux

This research explores perspectives on the accountability of Private Ancillary Funds (PAFs), a type of Australian endowed philanthropic foundation. PAFs are relatively new giving structures that have experienced strong growth over the past 15 years. With limited regulatory obligations and exemptions available from public reporting, PAFs have discretion in various forms of public accountability. Using Ebrahim’s conceptual framework of nonprofit accountability, this study explores PAF accountability in terms of to whom, for what, how, and why, examining tensions between PAFs’ private form and public purpose. Through in-depth interviews with managers and trustees of 10 PAFs, findings reveal that PAFs engage in accountability for internal reasons relating to their mission and purpose, and their desire to lead others in philanthropy. PAFs are influenced by philanthropic peers, in particular other PAFs; but their accountability does not necessarily include public disclosure or transparency. Four variations to Ebrahim’s accountability framework are proposed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 712-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joannie Tremblay-Boire ◽  
Aseem Prakash ◽  
Mary Kay Gugerty

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lev Jakobson ◽  
Irina Mersiyanova ◽  
Sergey Efremov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document