scholarly journals Social Value Orientation, Expectations, and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta–Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Luca Pletzer ◽  
Daniel Balliet ◽  
Jeff Joireman ◽  
D. Michael Kuhlman ◽  
Sven C. Voelpel ◽  
...  

Interdependent situations are pervasive in human life. In these situations, it is essential to form expectations about the others’ behaviour to adapt one's own behaviour to increase mutual outcomes and avoid exploitation. Social value orientation, which describes the dispositional weights individuals attach to their own and to another person's outcome, predicts these expectations of cooperation in social dilemmas—an interdependent situation involving a conflict of interests. Yet, scientific evidence is inconclusive about the exact differences in expectations between prosocials, individualists, and competitors. The present meta–analytic results show that, relative to proselfs (individualists and competitors), prosocials expect more cooperation from others in social dilemmas, whereas individualists and competitors do not significantly differ in their expectations. The importance of these expectations in the decision process is further highlighted by the finding that they partially mediate the well–established relation between social value orientation and cooperative behaviour in social dilemmas. In fact, even proselfs are more likely to cooperate when they expect their partner to cooperate. Copyright © 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1874
Author(s):  
Qionghan Zhang ◽  
Yingyuan Chen ◽  
Yuan Tao ◽  
Tahir Farid ◽  
Jianhong Ma

Achieving cooperation to address social dilemmas has long been a global problem. This study examined, using an environment-focused step-level public-goods-dilemma game, the effect a consistent contributor (CC) has on group cooperation, as well as the mediating role moral elevation and the moderating role social value orientation (SVO) play in this process. A total of 196 students were recruited and classified as “pro-selfs” or “pro-socials” based on their SVOs; individuals with the same SVO characterization were randomly allocated to groups of four, and then randomly assigned to the CC condition or the control condition to play 15 rounds of public-goods-dilemma games. In the CC condition, additional computer-controlled players represented the CCs. The results showed that the CC groups cooperated and earned more than the control groups did. Multi-level mediation analysis confirmed that moral elevation partially mediates the CC effect. Although the CCs had a direct impact on both pro-socials and pro-selfs, multi-level moderated-mediation analysis demonstrated that CCs influenced pro-socials directly, but affected pro-selfs’ decision-making indirectly, through moral elevation. This study contributes to a better understanding of sustainability of cooperation in social dilemmas by showing that consistent cooperative behaviors are contagious, and that their effects differ based on an individuals’ SVO.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Andrighetto ◽  
Valerio Capraro ◽  
Andrea Guido ◽  
Aron Szekely

Recent research at the cross between cognitive and social sci- ences is investigating the cognitive mechanisms behind coop- erative decisions. One debated question is whether cooperative decisions are made faster than non-cooperative ones. Yet em- pirical evidence is still mixed. In this paper we explore the implications of individual heterogeneity in social value orien- tation for the effect of response time on cooperation. We con- duct a meta-analysis of available experimental studies (n=8; treatments=16; 5,232 subjects). We report two main results: (i) the relation between response time and cooperation is mod- erated by social value orientation, such that it is positive for individualist subjects and negative for prosocial subjects; (ii) the relation between response time and cooperation is partly mediated by extremity of choice. These results suggest that highly prosocial subjects are fast to cooperate, highly individ- ualist subjects are fast to defect, and subjects with weaker pref- erences make slower and less extreme decisions. We explain these results in terms of decision-conflict theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document