Prediction of long-term strength of reinforced plastics. Treatment of prot linear stress-rupture data

1962 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold S. Loveless ◽  
Charles W. Deeley ◽  
Donald L. Swanson
Keyword(s):  
Stress Rupture ◽  
Term Strength ◽  
Reinforced Plastics ◽  
Rupture Data

Prediction of Long Term Stress Rupture Data for 2124

2006 ◽  
Vol 519-521 ◽  
pp. 1041-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Wilshire ◽  
H. Burt ◽  
N.P. Lavery
Keyword(s):  
Q Methodology ◽  
Fracture Behavior ◽  
Stress Rupture ◽  
Creep Data ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Rupture Data ◽  
Term Creep ◽  
Term Data ◽  
Short Term Creep

The standard power law approaches widely used to describe creep and creep fracture behavior have not led to theories capable of predicting long-term data. Similarly, traditional parametric methods for property rationalization also have limited predictive capabilities. In contrast, quantifying the shapes of short-term creep curves using the q methodology introduces several physically-meaningful procedures for creep data rationalization and prediction, which allow straightforward estimation of the 100,000 hour stress rupture values for the aluminum alloy, 2124.

Long-Term Strength and Design of Polyethylene Compounds for Pressure Pipe Applications

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Boros
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Elevated Temperatures ◽  
Hydrostatic Stress ◽  
Stress Rupture ◽  
Term Strength ◽  
Viscoelastic Creep ◽  
Pressure Pipe ◽  
Code Language

The interest in using polyethylene pipe in Class 3 safety water systems in nuclear power plants has grown tremendously in the last few years. PE pipe brings a host of benefits to the application in the form of long-term performance and reliability due to not being prone to corrosion and tuberculation. As the work continues through various ASME committees to develop the appropriate code language for the design and use of PE pipe, it is clear that plastics are not evaluated the same way metallic components would be in similar applications. However, the nature of the failure (i.e. ductile or brittle) is important for both. This paper will give an overview of the methodology used to establish the long-term hydrostatic strength of polyethylene compounds, and how that strength is used for engineering design in a safe a reliable manner. The strength of a polyethylene compound, being a thermoplastic, cannot be determined from a short-term tensile strength test, as with most metals. As such, testing and evaluation methodologies have been developed which take into account the viscoelastic creep response of thermoplastics, as well as potential changes in failure mode, in order to forecast the long-term hydrostatic strength of these materials so they can be safely used in a pressure pipe application. Since PE was first used in a piping application in the late 1950s, PE has continued to evolve as have the methodologies used to evaluate its strength against stresses induced by hydrostatic pressure. The common method for evaluation relies on putting specimens under multiple continuous, steady-state stress levels until failure. These data points are then used in a log-log linear regression evaluation. This regression equation is then extrapolated to a point sufficiently further out in time to where a long-term strength can be established. It has been clearly established that over a temperature range that the stress rupture behavior of PE follows an Arrhenius, or rate process, relationship between temperature and strength. By testing at elevated temperatures it can be “validated” that the extrapolation remains linear and ductile beyond the actual test data. This and other criteria established by ASTM D 2837 and the Plastics Pipe Institute’s Hydrostatic Stress Board allow for establishing an appropriate maximum working stress that will assure a very long design life.

Long-term strength of glass-reinforced plastics in dilute sulphuric acid

1982 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 3491-3498 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Aveston ◽  
J. M. Sillwood
Keyword(s):  
Sulphuric Acid ◽  
Term Strength ◽  
Reinforced Plastics

Evaluation of Stress Rupture Factors for Grade 91 Weldments

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Kimura ◽  
Masatsugu Yaguchi
Keyword(s):  
Base Metal ◽  
Rupture Strength ◽  
Stress Rupture ◽  
Creep Rupture ◽  
Creep Rupture Strength ◽  
Premature Failure ◽  
Rupture Data ◽  
Grade 91 ◽  
Grade 91 Steel

Abstract Stress rupture factors and weld strength reduction factors for Grade 91 steel weldments in the codes and literatures have been reviewed. Stress rupture factors for weld metals proposed for code case N-47 in the mid 1980's was defined as a ratio of average rupture strength of the deposited filler metal to the average rupture strength of the base metal. Remarkable drop in creep rupture strength of weldments is significant issue of Grade 91, especially in the low-stress and long-term regime. A premature failure of Grade 91 steel weldments in the long-term, however, is caused by type IV failure which takes place in the fine grain heat affected zone (FG-HAZ), rather than fracture in the deposited weld metal. The stress rupture factor of the Grade 91 steel, therefore, was based on the creep rupture strength of cross weld test specimens. Creep rupture data of Grade 91 steel weldments reported in the publication of ASME STP-PT-077 were integrated with the creep rupture data collected in Japan and used for this study. Time- and temperature-dependent stress rupture factors for Grade 91 steel have been evaluated based on the consolidated database as a ratio of average creep rupture strength of cross weld test specimen to the average creep rupture strength of base metal.

Subcritical Crack Growth and Long-Term Strength in Rock and High-Strength and Ultra Low-Permeability Concrete

2009 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 525-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka NARA ◽  
Masafumi TAKADA ◽  
Daisuke MORI ◽  
Hitoshi OWADA ◽  
Tetsuro YONEDA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crack Growth ◽  
Subcritical Crack Growth ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Term Strength
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document