scholarly journals Off‐label drug use in neonates and infants in Spain: a five‐year observational study.

Author(s):  
Irene Lizano‐Díez ◽  
Joseph Kargodorian ◽  
M. Ángeles Piñero‐López ◽  
Cecilia F. Lastra ◽  
Eduardo L. Mariño ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 001857872094222
Author(s):  
Aeshah AlAzmi ◽  
Zahra Alasmari ◽  
Consuela Yousef ◽  
Ahmed Alenazi ◽  
Mohammed AlOtaibi ◽  
...  

Objective: Prescribing a drug for a child is not an easy task and requires using the best available evidence as a guide, especially when a drug is used off-label. The practice of prescribing a drug for off-label use is fairly widespread worldwide. The FDA does not regulate prescribing patterns or practices of individual practitioners and, therefore, allows off-label use. The main objective of this study is to evaluate off-label prescribing among the pediatric population in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Method: This is a retrospective, simple random selection observational study of children (≤15 years) who visited pediatric clinics and had at least 1 drug prescribed over a 12-month period (January to December 2018). Results: A total of 865 drugs (mean 1 and SD 0.24) were prescribed to 326 children. Off-label was identified in 39.4% of the drugs with a frequency of 512 (as 1 drug may belong to more than 1 off-label category). The most common reason for off-label prescribing was related to doses that were “higher or lower than the recommended use” (48.6%), and the most frequently identified drug class prescribed for off-label use was anti-infective drugs for systemic use (39.9%). The percentage of off-label drug use was found to be higher in girls and in the age group of 1 month to 2 years ( P = .001) for both variables. In addition, a significant association was found between off label drug use and the total number of drugs prescribed, P < .001. Conclusion: The findings of this study showed a high incidence of off-label prescribing mainly related to dosing and indication. The results of this observational study support the need to establish a unified national pediatric dosing formulary guide to ensure safe drug use in pediatrics.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e00304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonas G. Tefera ◽  
Begashaw M. Gebresillassie ◽  
Abebe B. Mekuria ◽  
Tamrat B. Abebe ◽  
Daniel A. Erku ◽  
...  

Oncoreview ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-87
Author(s):  
Tomasz Jankowski ◽  
Monika Urbaniak

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-189
Author(s):  
Omotayo Fatokun

Background: While off-label drug use is common and sometimes necessary, it also presents considerable risks. Therefore, measures intended to prevent or reduce the potential exposure to off-label risks have been recommended. However, little is known about community pharmacists’ beliefs regarding these measures in Malaysia. Objectives: This study examined community pharmacists’ beliefs towards risk minimization measures in off-label drug use in Malaysia and assessed the relationship between perceived risk of off-label drug use and beliefs towards risk minimization measures. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 154 pharmacists practicing in randomly selected community pharmacies in Kuala Lumpur and the State of Selangor, Malaysia. Results: The majority agreed or strongly agreed that adverse drug events from the off-label drug should be reported to the regulatory authority (90.9%) and the off-label drug should only be used when the benefit outweighs potential risks (88.3%). Less than half (48.1%) agreed or strongly agreed that written informed consent should be obtained before dispensing off-label drugs and a majority (63.7%) agreed or strongly agreed that the informed consent process will be burdensome to healthcare professionals. Beliefs towards risk minimization measures were significantly associated with perceived risk of off-label drug use regarding efficacy (p = 0. 033), safety (p = 0.001), adverse drug rection (p = 0.001) and medication errors (p = 0.002). Conclusion: The community pharmacists have positive beliefs towards most of the risk minimization measures. However, beliefs towards written informed consent requirements are not encouraging. Enhancing risk perception may help influence positive beliefs towards risk minimization measures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document