Risk of amniocentesis in women screened positive for Down syndrome with second trimester maternal serum markers

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1036-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Françoise Muller ◽  
Didier Thibaud ◽  
Françoise Poloce ◽  
Marie-Christine Gelineau ◽  
Marguerite Bernard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Second Trimester

scholarly journals Invasive Trophoblast Antigen (Hyperglycosylated Human Chorionic Gonadotropin) in Second-Trimester Maternal Urine as a Marker for Down Syndrome: Preliminary Results of an Observational Study on Fresh Samples

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn E Palomaki ◽  
George J Knight ◽  
Marie M Roberson ◽  
George C Cunningham ◽  
Jo Ellen Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Hyperglycosylated Human Chorionic Gonadotropin

Abstract Background: Down syndrome screening is commonly performed in the US using maternal age and three or four second-trimester maternal serum markers that can identify up to 75% of affected pregnancies by offering diagnostic studies to 5% of women. Invasive trophoblast antigen [ITA; hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)] is a promising marker that can be measured in urine or serum in the first or second trimester. We report preliminary results for urinary ITA in an ongoing observational study. Methods: Women undergoing second-trimester amniocentesis for reasons not associated with biochemical testing provided consent and a urine (and possibly serum) sample that was tested within a few days. Demographic and pregnancy-related information was collected, along with karyotype. Screening performance was modeled for ITA alone and in combination with serum markers Results: Twelve recruitment centers collected urine from 2055 women with singleton pregnancies between 15 and 20 weeks of gestation (2023 unaffected, 28 Down syndrome, and 4 pregnancies with other chromosome abnormalities). After correction for gestational age, urine concentration, and maternal race and weight, the ITA measurements were higher in women with a Down syndrome pregnancy (median ITA, 4.33 multiples of the median). At a 75% detection rate, the false-positive rate could be reduced by substituting ITA for hCG measurements (from 5.6% to 2.6% for the triple test) or by adding ITA measurements to existing combinations (from 3.3% to 2.0% for the quadruple test). Conclusions: Our data provide preliminary confirmation of the potential usefulness of urinary ITA measurements in detecting Down syndrome in a setting that simulates routine usage.

Risk of Amniocentesis in Women Screened Positive for Down Syndrome With Second Trimester Maternal Serum Markers

2003 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 299-300
Author(s):  
Françoise Muller ◽  
Didier Thibaud ◽  
Françoise Poloce ◽  
Marie-Christine Gelineau ◽  
Marguerite Bernard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Second Trimester

scholarly journals The Effect of Down Syndrome Biochemical Markers on Predicting Severity of Preeclampsia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
AYSE OZBAN
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Biochemical Markers ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Second Trimester Screening ◽  
Trimester Screening

Abstract Objective: This study aims to determine whether it is possible to predict preeclampsia by comparing postpartum results and test results of the pregnant women diagnosed with preeclampsia, whose first and/or second trimester screening tests were accessible, and to demonstrate the predictability of severity and week of onset.Background: 204 patients underwent renal transplantation in our center and 84 of them were female. Five of our patients (one of them had two births) gave birth to a total of 6 pregnancies.Method: 135 patients were diagnosed with preeclampsia and their first and/or second trimester screening tests were accessible, and 366 control participants gave birth to a healthy baby between 37-41 weeks after standard follow-up period for pregnancy and their screening tests were also accessible.Results: The study results show that the first trimester maternal serum PAPP-A level is significantly low in preeclamptic pregnant women, and that the second trimester maternal serum AFP and hCG levels are significantly high and uE3 levels are significantly low The results also suggest that the first and second trimester Down syndrome biochemical markers can be used in preeclampsia screening.Conclusion: Among these markers, uE3 is the parameter which affects the possibility of preeclampsia the most. However, the first and second trimester Down syndrome biochemical markers are not effective in predicting the severity and onset week of preeclampsia.

Second-trimester Down syndrome maternal serum screening in twin pregnancies: impact of chorionicity

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fran�oise Muller ◽  
Sophie Dreux ◽  
Henry Dupoizat ◽  
Serge Uzan ◽  
Marie-Fran�oise Dubin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Maternal Serum Screening ◽  
Serum Screening ◽  
Twin Pregnancies

scholarly journals Maternal Serum Invasive Trophoblast Antigen (Hyperglycosylated hCG) as a Screening Marker for Down Syndrome during the Second Trimester

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 1804-1808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn E Palomaki ◽  
Louis M Neveux ◽  
George J Knight ◽  
James E Haddow ◽  
Raj Pandian
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Down Syndrome ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
The United States ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Marker Panel ◽  
Screening Performance ◽  
Β Hcg ◽  
Screening Marker

Abstract Background: Approximately two million pregnancies in the United States are screened for Down syndrome annually by use of second-trimester maternal serum markers. At present, a combination of four markers can identify 75% of affected pregnancies when 5% of screened women are classified as candidates for amniocentesis. Although not currently included in screening panels, invasive trophoblast antigen (ITA) is a promising screening marker in serum or urine in both the second and first trimesters. This study aims at better defining the screening performance of serum ITA in the second trimester. Methods: In an earlier study, serum samples from an unbiased sampling of 45 Down syndrome (cases) and 238 unaffected (control) pregnancies between 14 and 20 weeks of gestation were collected from various centers in the United States. Samples were aliquoted and stored at −20 °C for 8 years. We measured ITA in these samples and determined the screening performance both univariately and in combination with other screening markers. Results: The median ITA in Down syndrome pregnancies was >3.00 multiples of the median, higher than that found for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or free β-hCG. At a 5% false-positive rate, ITA univariately detected 38% and 40% of Down syndrome pregnancies, respectively, when assigned by date of last menstrual period or ultrasound date. Modeling yielded rates of 45% and 48%. ITA correlated strongly with hCG and free β-hCG. When substituted for either of these in a multiple marker panel, ITA performed comparably. Conclusions: This study indicates that serum ITA is an effective marker for Down syndrome. It is highly correlated with both hCG and free β-hCG and could replace either of them in a multiple marker panel.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Agreement of Risk Categorization for Fetal Down Syndrome Screening between Ultrasound-Based Gestational Age and Menstrual-Based Gestational Age by Maternal Serum Markers

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Pakorn Chaksuwat ◽  
Supatra Sirichotiyakul ◽  
Suchaya Luewan ◽  
Theera Tongsong
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Menstrual Period ◽  
Last Menstrual Period ◽  
Second Trimester Screening ◽  
Risk Categorization ◽  
Down Syndrome Screening

Objective. To evaluate the agreement of risk categorization for Down syndrome screening between ultrasound scan-based gestational age (GA) and last menstrual period-based gestational age in both first and second trimesters by maternal serum markers. Methods. Data comprising 4,055 and 4,016 cases of first and second trimester screening were used. The maternal serum markers were analyzed using the ultrasound-based GA and menstrual age. The subjects whose menstrual age and ultrasound-based GA fell in different trimesters were excluded because the risk could not be calculated due to the different serum markers used in each trimester. The agreement of risk categorization for fetal Down syndrome was evaluated. Results. The agreement of Down syndrome screening in the first and the second trimesters were 92.7% and 89%, respectively. The study found a good agreement of risk categorization by Kappa index, which was 0.615 for the overall screening. The menstrual age had a slight decrease in the detection rate and a lower false-positive rate. Conclusion. Menstrual age is acceptable in cases of accurate last menstrual period. However, in places where ultrasonography is not readily available, gestational age estimation by menstrual age along with clinical examination that corresponds to the gestational age can be reliable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document