Estimation of risk in second trimester serum screening for Down syndrome among women who have already had first trimester screening

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1051-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Hackshaw ◽  
Nicholas Wald
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
First Trimester Screening ◽  
Serum Screening ◽  
Trimester Screening ◽  
Estimation Of Risk

scholarly journals Fetal Down syndrome screening models for developing countries; Part I: Performance of Maternal Serum Screening

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanane Wanapirak ◽  
Wirawit Piyamongkol ◽  
Supatra Sirichotiyakul ◽  
Fuanglada Tongprasert ◽  
Kasemsri Srisupundit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Reference Range ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
First Trimester Screening ◽  
Maternal Serum Screening ◽  
Serum Screening ◽  
Trimester Screening

Abstract Background To identify the performance of fetal Down syndrome (DS) screening for developing countries. Methods A prospective study on MSS (maternal serum screening) with complete follow-ups (n = 41,924) was conducted in 32 network hospitals in the northern part of Thailand. Various models of MSS were tested for performance. Results MSS based on Caucasian reference range resulted in very high false positive rate (FPR; 13%) in our country, compared to the rate of 7.8% with our own (Thai) reference range, whereas the detection rate was comparable. As individual screening, C-S (contingent first trimester screening including PAPP-A, and free beta-hCG, classified as a) high risk [> 1:30], indicated for invasive diagnosis; b) intermediate risk [1:30–1500], indicated for STS; and c) low risk [< 1:1500], need no further tests.) was the most effective model (sensitivity 84.9%, FPR 7.7%) but nearly one-third needed the second trimester test (STS) because of intermediate results. Additionally, about one-third had their first visits in the second trimester and had no chance of FTS (first trimester screening). C-S plus STS had a sensitivity of 82.4% and FPR 8.1% whereas independent first and second trimester screening model (I-S) gave the sensitivity of 78.4% and FPR of 7.5% but was much more convenient and practical. Conclusion C-S plus STS was the most effective models while I-S model was also effective and may be better for developing countries because of its simplicity and feasibility.

scholarly journals The Effect of Down Syndrome Biochemical Markers on Predicting Severity of Preeclampsia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
AYSE OZBAN
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Biochemical Markers ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Second Trimester Screening ◽  
Trimester Screening

Abstract Objective: This study aims to determine whether it is possible to predict preeclampsia by comparing postpartum results and test results of the pregnant women diagnosed with preeclampsia, whose first and/or second trimester screening tests were accessible, and to demonstrate the predictability of severity and week of onset.Background: 204 patients underwent renal transplantation in our center and 84 of them were female. Five of our patients (one of them had two births) gave birth to a total of 6 pregnancies.Method: 135 patients were diagnosed with preeclampsia and their first and/or second trimester screening tests were accessible, and 366 control participants gave birth to a healthy baby between 37-41 weeks after standard follow-up period for pregnancy and their screening tests were also accessible.Results: The study results show that the first trimester maternal serum PAPP-A level is significantly low in preeclamptic pregnant women, and that the second trimester maternal serum AFP and hCG levels are significantly high and uE3 levels are significantly low The results also suggest that the first and second trimester Down syndrome biochemical markers can be used in preeclampsia screening.Conclusion: Among these markers, uE3 is the parameter which affects the possibility of preeclampsia the most. However, the first and second trimester Down syndrome biochemical markers are not effective in predicting the severity and onset week of preeclampsia.

First trimester screening (FTS) in the detection of down syndrome

2004 ◽  
Vol 191 (6) ◽  
pp. S176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo-Ann Johnson ◽  
Barry Hoffman ◽  
David Chitayat ◽  
Elizabeth Winsor ◽  
Kenneth Pritzker
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
First Trimester Screening ◽  
Trimester Screening

Screening for Down syndrome in the first trimester

1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
KJ Powell ◽  
JG Grudzinskas
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Maternal Blood ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Maternal Serum Screening ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
Serum Screening ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Trimester Screening

Second-trimester maternal serum screening for Down syndrome is now well established, and permits detection of up to 70% of cases. The disadvantage of this sort of screening is that the timing of maternal blood sampling is relatively late (after 15 weeks). There is an accumulating body of evidence to suggest that in the first trimester concentrations of a number of pregnancy-associated proteins and hormones differ in chromosomally normal and abnormal pregnancies. A first-trimester maternal serum screening test for Down syndrome may therefore be possible. In addition, new methods of screening have recently been described based on ultrasound findings at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation. This review article presents a discussion of published data on the feasibility of first-trimester screening for Down syndrome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document