Trends in prenatal screening and diagnostic testing among women referred for advanced maternal age

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Nakata ◽  
Yuemei Wang ◽  
Sucheta Bhatt
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Age ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age

scholarly journals Efficiency of non-invasive prenatal screening in pregnant women at advanced maternal age

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Zhu ◽  
Xiaoxiao Jin ◽  
Yuqing Xu ◽  
Weihua Zhang ◽  
Xiaodan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Youden Index ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is widely used as the alternative choice for pregnant women at high-risk of fetal aneuploidy. However, whether NIPS has a good detective efficiency for pregnant women at advanced maternal age (AMA) has not been fully studied especially in Chinese women. Methods Twenty-nine thousand three hundred forty-three pregnant women at AMA with singleton pregnancy who received NIPS and followed-up were recruited. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the Youden Index for detecting fetal chromosomal aneuploidies were analyzed. The relationship between maternal age and common fetal chromosomal aneuploidy was observed. Results The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of NIPS for detecting fetal trisomy 21 were 99.11, 99.96, 90.98, and 100%, respectively. These same parameters for detecting fetal trisomy 18 were 100, 99.94, 67.92, and 100%, respectively. Finally, these parameters for detecting trisomy 13 were 100, 99.96, 27.78, and 100%, respectively. The prevalence of fetal trisomy 21 increased exponentially with maternal age. The high-risk percentage incidence rate of fetal trisomy 21 was significantly higher in the pregnant women at 37 years old or above than that in pregnant women at 35 to 37 years old. (Youden index = 37). Conclusion It is indicated that NIPS is an effective prenatal screening method for pregnant women at AMA.

scholarly journals Predictive value of aberrant right subclavian artery for fetal chromosomal in women of advanced maternal age

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Hong You ◽  
Li-Ping Chen ◽  
Xiao-Hong Zhong ◽  
Jiang-Hua Chen ◽  
Jing-Xian Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subclavian Artery ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
Singleton Pregnancies ◽  
Fetal Karyotype

Abstract Background: In entire population, aberrant right subclavian artery ( ARSA ) was in closely association with chromosomal abnormalities. The risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities increased with the maternal age exponentially. While, the situation in advanced maternal age ( AMA ) group is uncertain. This study aimed to establish the incidence of ARSA in Chinese AMA and non-AMA women and to determine the frequency of aneuploidy among AMA and non-AMA women with ARSA. Methods: The retrospective study included 13,690 singleton pregnancies which were divided into AMA and non-AMA groups. Integrated obstetric ultrasonic screening, biochemical screening, noninvasive prenatal screening and fetal karyotype analysis were analyzed. Results: 1. The overall incidence of ARSA was 0.69 % with no difference in both groups. 2. The prevalence rate of chromosomal abnormalities in AMA group ( 37 / 2,860 ) was much higher than that in non-AMA group. The risk of chromosomal abnormalities significantly increased with both ARSA detected and additional ultrasound findings. 3. With ARSA detected, the incidence increased to 20.00 % and 10.00 % in AMA and non-AMA cases, respectively. 4. Additionally, a case with chimeric Turner syndrome ( 45X / 46XX ) was found with isolated ARSA in AMA pregnancy. Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in AMA fetuses. Both isolated and nonisolated ARSA would increase the risk of chromosomal abnormalities. Moreover, when ARSA is found in AMA ones, it confers a sharp increase in the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities.

scholarly journals Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening in Pregnant Women at Advanced Maternal Age

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Zhu ◽  
Xiaoxiao Jin ◽  
Yuqing Xu ◽  
Weihua Zhang ◽  
Xiaodan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Youden Index ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background: Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is widely used as the alternative choice for pregnant women at high-risk of fetal aneuploidy. However, whether NIPS has a good detective efficiency for pregnant women at advanced maternal age (AMA) has not been fully studied especially in Chinese women. Methods: 29,343 pregnant women at AMA with singleton pregnancy who received NIPS and followed-up were recruited. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the Youden Index for detecting fetal chromosomal aneuploidies were analyzed. The relationship between maternal age and common fetal chromosomal aneuploidy was observed. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of NIPS for detecting fetal trisomy 21 were 99.11%, 99.96%, 90.98%, and 100%, respectively. These same parameters for detecting fetal trisomy 18 were 100%, 99.94%, 67.92%, and 100%, respectively. Finally, these parameters for detecting trisomy 13 were 100%, 99.96%, 27.78%, and 100%, respectively. The prevalence of fetal trisomy 21 increased exponentially with maternal age. The high-risk percentage incidence rate of fetal trisomy 21 was significantly higher in the pregnant women at 37 years old or above than that in pregnant women at 35 to 37 years old. (Youden index=37). Conclusion: It is indicated that NIPS is an effective prenatal screening method for pregnant women at AMA.

scholarly journals Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening in Pregnant Women at Advanced Maternal Age

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Zhu ◽  
Xiaoxiao Jin ◽  
Yuqing Xu ◽  
Weihua Zhang ◽  
Xiaodan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Noninvasive Prenatal Screening ◽  
Fetal Aneuploidies

Abstract Background: To evaluate the efficiency of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in the prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies in pregnant women at advanced maternal age (AMA). Results: From February 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018, 29,443 pregnant women at AMA underwent NIPS and followed-up were recruited. Their detailed clinical data and follow-up outcomes were collected and analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of NIPS for detecting fetal trisomy 21 were 99.11%, 99.96%, 90.98%, and 100%, respectively. These same parameters for detecting fetal trisomy 18 were 100%, 99.94%, 67.92%, and 100%, respectively. Finally, these parameters for detecting trisomy 13 were 100%, 99.96%, 27.78%, and 100%, respectively. The prevalence of fetal trisomy 21 increased with maternal age. There were significant differences in the prevalence of fetal trisomy 21 among the groups I (35-37-year-old), II (38-40-year-old) and III (41-year-old and older) ( P <0.05). Conclusion: It is indicated that NIPS is an effective prenatal screening method in pregnant women at AMA. Keywords: Advanced maternal age, Trisomy, Noninvasive prenatal screening, Fetal aneuploidies , Prenatal screening method

scholarly journals Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening in Pregnant Women at Advanced Maternal Age

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Zhu ◽  
Xiaoxiao Jin ◽  
Yuqing Xu ◽  
Weihua Zhang ◽  
Xiaodan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Fetal Aneuploidies

Abstract Background To evaluate the efficiency of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in the prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies in pregnant women at advanced maternal age (AMA). Methods From February 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018, 29,343 pregnant women at AMA underwent NIPS and followed-up were recruited. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting fetal chromosomal aneuploidies were analyzed. The relationship between maternal age and common fetal chromosomal aneuploidy was observed. Results The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of NIPS for detecting fetal trisomy 21 were 99.11%, 99.96%, 90.98%, and 100%, respectively. These same parameters for detecting fetal trisomy 18 were 100%, 99.94%, 67.92%, and 100%, respectively. Finally, these parameters for detecting trisomy 13 were 100%, 99.96%, 27.78%, and 100%, respectively. The prevalence of fetal trisomy 21 increased with maternal age. There were significant differences in the prevalence of fetal trisomy 21 among the groups I (35-37-year-old), II (38-40-year-old) and III (41-year-old and older) (P < 0.05). Conclusion It is indicated that NIPS is an effective prenatal screening method in pregnant women at AMA.

scholarly journals Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening in Pregnant Women at Advanced Maternal Age

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Zhu ◽  
Xiaoxiao Jin ◽  
Yuqing Xu ◽  
Weihua Zhang ◽  
Xiaodan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Youden Index ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background: Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is widely used as the alternative choice for pregnant women at high-risk of fetal aneuploidy. However, whether NIPS has a good detective efficiency for pregnant women at advanced maternal age (AMA) has not been fully studied especially in Chinese women. Methods: 29,343 pregnant women at AMA with singleton pregnancy who received NIPS and followed-up were recruited. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the Youden Index for detecting fetal chromosomal aneuploidies were analyzed. The relationship between maternal age and common fetal chromosomal aneuploidy was observed. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of NIPS for detecting fetal trisomy 21 were 99.11%, 99.96%, 90.98%, and 100%, respectively. These same parameters for detecting fetal trisomy 18 were 100%, 99.94%, 67.92%, and 100%, respectively. Finally, these parameters for detecting trisomy 13 were 100%, 99.96%, 27.78%, and 100%, respectively. The prevalence of fetal trisomy 21 increased exponentially with maternal age. The high-risk percentage incidence rate of fetal trisomy 21 was significantly higher in the pregnant women at 37 years old or above than that in pregnant women at 35 to 37 years old. (Youden index=37). Conclusion: It is indicated that NIPS is an effective prenatal screening method for pregnant women at AMA.

scholarly journals Detecting atypical anomalies by non-invasive prenatal screening in advanced maternal age vs. sonographically abnormal pregnancies

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S682
Author(s):  
Emily E. Daggett ◽  
Manesha Putra ◽  
Noria McCarther ◽  
Vanja Dimitrijevic ◽  
Shashirekha Shetty
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Age ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Non Invasive
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document