Comparison of first-trimester transvaginal amniocentesis with chorionic villus sampling and mid-trimester amniocentesis

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Shalev ◽  
E. Weiner ◽  
N. Yanai ◽  
Y. Shneur ◽  
H. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Chorionic Villus ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Chorionic Villus Sampling

Chorionic villus sampling: First trimester prenatal diagnosis

1986 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 747-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan T. Bombard ◽  
Joe Leigh Simpson ◽  
Sherman Elias ◽  
Alice O. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Chorionic Villus ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Chorionic Villus Sampling

scholarly journals Gene Expression in First Trimester Preeclampsia Placenta

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra A. Founds ◽  
Lauren A. Terhorst ◽  
Kirk P. Conrad ◽  
W. Allen Hogge ◽  
Arun Jeyabalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Candidate Genes ◽  
Chorionic Villus ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Chorionic Villus Sampling ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Individualized Care ◽  
Additional Control ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
The Difference

Background. The goal of this study was to further validate eight candidate genes identified in a microarray analysis of first trimester placentas in preeclampsia. Material and method. Surplus chorionic villus sampling (CVS) specimens of 4 women subsequently diagnosed with preeclampsia (PE) and 8 control women (C) without preeclampsia analyzed previously by microarray and 24 independent additional control samples (AS) were submitted for confirmatory studies by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results. Downregulation was significant in FSTL3 in PE as compared to C and AS (p = .04). PAEP was downregulated, but the difference was only significant between C and AS (p = .002) rather than between PE and either of the control groups. Expression levels for CFH, EPAS1, IGFBP1, MMP12, and SEMA3C were not statistically different among groups, but trends were consistent with microarray results; there was no anti-correlation. S100A8 was not measurable in all samples, probably because different probes and primers were needed. Conclusions. This study corroborates reduced FSTL3 expression in the first trimester of preeclampsia. Nonsignificant trends in the other genes may require follow-up in studies powered for medium or medium/large effect sizes. qRT-PCR verification of the prior microarray of CVS may support the placental origins of preeclampsia hypothesis. Replication is needed for the candidate genes as potential biomarkers of susceptibility, early detection, and/or individualized care of maternal—infant preeclampsia.

scholarly journals INCREASED NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY IN A FETUS WITH A NORMAL KARYOTYPE: CASE REPORT

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-61
Author(s):  
Cristina Moisei ◽  
Anca Lesnica ◽  
Romina Marina Sima ◽  
Liana Pleș
Keyword(s):  
Chorionic Villus ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Nuchal Translucency ◽  
Trisomy 18 ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Chorionic Villus Sampling ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
First Trimester Ultrasound ◽  
Increased Nuchal Translucency

Nuchal translucency (NT) is the normal fluid filled subcutaneous space measured at the back of the fetal neck measured in the late first trimester and early second trimester. Nuchal translucency screening can detect approximately 80% of fetuses with Down syndrome and other major aneuploidies with a rate of 5% of false positive results, but the merger of the NT screening with β-hCG and PAPP-A testing increases the detection rate to 90%. We present the case of a fetus with a NT of 49 mm detected at the first trimester ultrasound morphologic exam. The Kryptor test revealed a 1:35 risk for Trisomy 13 and 1:721 for Trisomy 18. We report the case of an investigated pregnancy with a NT of 49 mm detected at the first trimester ultrasound exam, with a risk of 1:35 for Trisomy 13 and 1:721 for Trisomy 18 calculated at the Kryptor test. A chorionic villus sampling was recommended and performed with a result of 46XY normal karyotype. The particularity of this case is represented by the increased nuchal translucency as well as an increased risk for trisomy 13 and 18 in a normal karyotype fetus that had a normal development in the second and third trimester with no pregnancy complications arising.

Uptake of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Chinese Women following Positive Down Syndrome Screening

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.F. Poon ◽  
W.C. Tse ◽  
K.O. Kou ◽  
K.Y. Leung
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Chinese Women ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Chorionic Villus ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Chorionic Villus Sampling ◽  
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing ◽  
Down Syndrome Screening

Objectives: To investigate how the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) influenced women's testing choices following a positive Down syndrome screening. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to compare differences in the uptake rates of invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) or no testing in one public hospital 1 year before (pre-NIPT) and 1 and 2 years after the introduction of NIPT in private in August 2011 using descriptive analysis and a χ2 test. Conventional screening was funded publicly, but NIPT was not. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to determine factors affecting choices. Results: In pre-NIPT and in years 1 and 2 after the introduction of NIPT, 306, 362 and 401 women who screened positive were seen, respectively. In year 1 and year 2, 12.6 and 26.7% of them underwent NIPT while IPD was decreased by 16.3 and 25.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Both chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis decreased in year 1, but only the former in year 2. However, the rate of declining further testing was similar before and after NIPT (p = 0.213). In multivariable analysis, first trimester screening, nulliparity and working women were significant predictors of accepting NIPT, while only nulliparity was a predictor of declining IPD (OR = 0.61). Conclusions: Introduction of NIPT resulted in a significant decrease in IPD for 2 consecutive years.

Integrating Microarrays into Routine Prenatal Diagnosis: Determinants of Decision Making

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Cordoba ◽  
Stephanie Andriole ◽  
Shara M. Evans ◽  
David Britt ◽  
Melissa Chu Lam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Chorionic Villus ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Comparative Genomic ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Chorionic Villus Sampling ◽  
Retrospective Case

Objectives: The explosion in genetic technologies, including array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), has increased the complexity of genetic counseling. We now offer chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and aCGH to all first-trimester patients, as this allows the prenatal diagnosis of an additional 1% of anomalies not otherwise detectable and can detect genetic copy number variants at a much higher resolution than conventional cytogenetics. Here, we explored some of the determinants of how patients are deciding to use or not use this new technology and evaluate risk-benefit analyses for that decision. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study of singleton and multiples pregnancies at our center. Those having aCGH testing along with CVS were defined as ‘testers' and those who declined aCGH but had the CVS were ‘nontesters'. Results: Demographic data of 181 educated women who chose CVS were compared. Among those carrying singletons (n = 144), older women, defined as over 35 years of age (or ‘advanced maternal age'; AMA), were more likely to choose the aCGH than younger women. Further, women who had a prior history of genetic testing and who wanted to know the gender of the fetus were more likely to choose the aCGH test. In women carrying multiples (n = 37), AMA ceases to be a predictor of choice. Having had prior genetic counseling remains a strong predictor for choosing aCGH, as does wanting to know the gender of the fetus. Neither prior abortions nor having prior children were significant for women carrying singletons or multiples. Conclusion: Offering pregnant couples an individualized choice regarding aCGH seems an appropriate approach. There are discrete patterns associated with the choice of taking the aCGH that varied depending on whether the patient was carrying a singleton or multiples.

First trimester diagnosis of RhO (D) with an immunofluorescence technique after chorionic villus sampling

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. C. Fuhrman ◽  
F. Klink ◽  
G. Grzejszczyk ◽  
A. Vossberg ◽  
A. Poschmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chorionic Villus ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Chorionic Villus Sampling ◽  
Immunofluorescence Technique
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document